Why is the end of science theology, and the end of science is theology, who said

Theology is not the end of science.

If we know that this sentence was uttered by Albert Einstein, one of the greatest scientists of all time; If we know that it wasn't just Albert Einstein who said this, another great scientist in history, Newton, spent the last 40 years of his life studying theology, studying alchemy, and proving the existence of God.

If we knew that more than 80 percent of the greatest scientists of all time believed in God, I wonder if we would laugh at it.

The end of science: The end of science is still science, and the reason why many great physical scientists have developed into theological believers in the end may be that their knowledge of their time was limited, and they studied too many things beyond that era, and they had no way to understand it, nor did they have the ability to create a new system and explain it, so they can only attribute it to theology.

Science is science, but the development of science is destined to be full of setbacks and ups and downs, just like Copernicus's heliocentric theory has also suffered from the opposition of almost everyone in the world, at that time it was believed that the earth was the center of the solar system, but now people are clear that the center of the solar system is the sun, not the earth, just like people used to think that the sky is round and the earth is square.

After Columbus's voyage, people gradually agreed that the earth was round, although this time was very long, but science is a kind of discovery, existing facts, and then summarized through words.

It is a path that one explores and knows.

After learning a certain amount of scientific knowledge, you will find that pure scientific knowledge does not give you the answer to your initial question, and the more you learn science, the narrower the scope becomes. But if you still have a yearning for the final answer (and some people study science and end up being just a tool for eating), you will inevitably move in the direction of philosophy.

However, philosophy discusses a lot of profound questions, a lot of ideas, but it still doesn't give you a result. Finally, the answer was found when God was found as the source of everything.

Because it can't be explained by nature, it is ultimately attributed to God's design, God's control, computers, cars, mobile phones, etc. are all created by a certain consciousness, so is the human body, and the social order is controlled by God's consciousness, and science and theology are not in conflict.

Albert Einstein once said, "When a scientist climbs a mountain, he finds that theologians are already sitting there." In other words: the end of science is theology. If such a statement comes from the mouth of a great scientist, you must be as puzzled as I am.

Many people are proud of science and ashamed of religion, but they don't know that science is just a new religion that human beings have created for themselves to worship.

Traditional education often leads us into a kind of black and white, right or wrong, such as the relationship between science and religion, which has always been incompatible with each other or even a state of life and death in our minds, but unfortunately the facts surprise us.

Yang ZhenningSaid,He believed that there was a Creator and explained why. This ** was used by many people with ulterior motives, and used to hype theology, and claimed that even great scientists like Yang Zhenning believed in God, and of course they did not spare Newton and Einstein.

Yang Zhenning's "Creator".

To understand this problem, we must first trace the content of this **. If we find the interview at that time, we will find that this 2-minute ** was actually maliciously truncated, and some content was deliberately truncated.

When Yang Zhenning was on a related issue, he first emphasized that he was against gods in any religious sense, against those gods with "human form", and the creator was not the kind of old man who could fly. In other words, the creator mentioned by Yang is not "God" in the religious sense.

Zhu Qingshi.

At the earliest, it was a man named Zhu Qingshi, who was a well-known chemist, engaged in chemistry, but did not understand quantum mechanics.

This man didn't understand the basics of quantum mechanics, but he liked Buddhism, and he happened to see a Western scholar write a book called "The Way of Physics", which said that if modern science wants to break through, it must be combined with Eastern metaphysics (Yang Zhenning.

criticized and said that this book is nonsense). When Zhu Qingshi saw it, he was a little crazy, and he actually believed it.

There was a pseudoscience at the time.

It's called "Quantum Buddhism", Zhu Qingshi was superstitious about this kind of thing, propagated it everywhere, and added a little bit of his own delusions, so he wrote an article called "Physics Enters the Zen Realm" (this article was written by Li Miao.

criticized it, thinking that the content in it was low-level and naïve). At the end of the article, Zhu Qingshi made a summary, to the effect that the scientists had worked hard to climb the mountain and reached the top of the mountain, and found a group of great monks waiting on the top of the mountain for a long time.

This sentence is the first original version of "the end of science is xx". After that, it was simplified to "the end of science is Buddhism". In this way, the others were not satisfied, and followed suit, making up the words "the end of science is the I Ching, and the end of science is metaphysics".

Then the version that "the end of science is philosophy, and the end of philosophy is theology" also appeared.

Related information

Science has an end, and the science that human beings can involve and have a theoretical basis is only a very small part of what the universe has developed. In a deeper and broader field, human beings can only open up the mysteries of the future universe by speculating and testing little by little in the process of continuous evolution.

With the development of modern civilization, human beings have become more rational in their understanding of the meaning and cognition of science. Science is to systematically analyze everything that happens around us, and then make reasonable explanations based on theoretical foundations. Theology, on the other hand, is what people think is empty and boundless, something that most people have imagined, and a speculation that has no theoretical experience or foundation.

The end of science is theologyFrom what Newton and Einstein said.

The end of science is theology, so this phrase is generally believed to have been said by Albert Einstein. And this statement is also based on a special phenomenon, that is, the world's top physicists such as Newton and Einstein.

When a view is widely popular, culture is formed, philosophy is a worldview and an integral part of culture, and the view of the world is a cultural view. Its impact on people's work, study and life is all-encompassing, and the end of science is the generation of theology.

As we can see from Newton and Einstein, the statement that many scientists began to study theology in their later years does not stand up to scrutiny. The end of science is not theology, because there is an end to theology, and there is no end to science. With time and deeper research, we can get closer to the essence of everything.

Theology thus came to an end, but science is not omnipotent, and theology has not completely withdrawn from the stage of history. Because this universe is incomparably vast, although human knowledge has accumulated for thousands of years, it is still somewhat small in front of the universe. Perhaps in the next few hundred years, when humanity can travel into space and colonize other galaxies, we will completely lose the phrase that theology is the end of science.

*The end of science is theology** The phrase was not said by Albert Einstein. In fact, Einstein never made such a statement.

No, science should be never-ending, science is still science after science.

Science and theology are actually interconnected, if we take modern technology back to ancient times, and modern technology has been able to go to heaven and earth, then in the eyes of the ancients we are "gods", because we have done what they can't do; Some of the supernatural phenomena that we don't understand now may be like the ancients who looked at us, but beyond what we already know, and are also called "gods".

As long as human beings are present, the development of science will not end. Not to mention that the universe is so vast, human beings' current understanding is only a very small part, the object of scientific research is vast, and human beings' understanding of the universe can only be infinitely close, but it is impossible to understand it completely, so there is no end to science.

Branch of Science

Modern science is generally divided into three main branches, including the natural sciences, the social sciences, and the formal sciences. Each of these branches encompasses a variety of specialized but overlapping scientific disciplines, which often have their own terminology and expertise.

Both the natural and social sciences are empirical sciences because their knowledge is based on empirical observations and is able to test its validity by other researchers working under the same conditions. There are also closely related disciplines that use science, such as engineering and medicine, sometimes referred to as applied sciences.

There is no end to science, only deeper exploration.

The scientific community is a mystery, waiting for us to discover its beauty

There is no end to science. We can't finish learning.

No, it should belong to a higher science.

No, there is a lot of more advanced science.

Probably not, probably more advanced science.

No, the science is endless.

In general, there is no end to science.

What exactly is at the end of science still needs to be studied.

But then, the end of the universe is theology, don't question it.

This can't be guessed casually, but only after you have really done it.

Einstein himself made it very clear that he did not believe in any religion, even in his later years, when Einstein rejected religion at the age of 12, believing that religion with personified gods was nothing more than a lie.

I don't know this, after all, the beginning of science is also theology, isn't it?

If you don't think that's the case, don't believe it, after all, it may be fake.

I don't think this can be speculated casually, it depends on the situation after that.

Quite possibly, because in the end it will still feel like the world is wonderful.

Probably not. The gods in mythology are so awesome with science that I don't think they can reach that point.