Why the development of science cannot make religion disappear

Science can only solve the contradictions of the material world, but whether our world is the material origin or the consciousness or the spiritual origin has not yet been determined, and people need to use religion to satisfy the confusion and anxiety of the spiritual world.

The purpose of "Wei Dao" in the Chinese philosophical tradition is to improve the state of the mind. When science advances, religion takes a step back, and in the face of science, the prestige of religion is reduced.

In the development of science and philosophy, there are some studies and explorations that try to subvert the foundation of religious beliefs, such as the development of evolutionary theory in science and the development of atheism in philosophy (the reason why "development" is used because evolutionary theory and unpolished mammotheism had already taken shape in ancient Greece). However, the emergence and development of these theories have always been accompanied by the development of religious beliefs, so they are not in essence a "rebellion against faith in God".

The development of science is not a hidden factor affecting religious beliefs, but a way for human beings to know, understand, and interpret the universe, and people have full autonomy to choose what to believe. Speaking of science alone, there is also a gap of confidence that people must cross, such as big **, primitive evolution, etc.

Summary. Dear, glad to answer for you! Religion and superstition are stumbling blocks that hinder the development of science.

Dear, glad to answer for you! Religion and superstition are stumbling blocks that hinder the development of science.

The study of the history of world science argues that science began in ancient Greece. More than 2,000 years ago, a large number of philosophical and scientific giants emerged in ancient Greece, such as Euclid, Archimedes, Pythagoras, Diophantus, Aristocle, Aristotle, Plato, Socrates, Thales, Lavoisier, Descartes and so on. In addition to making tremendous achievements in mathematics, mechanics, optics, astronomy, biology, and other fields, these pioneers of science who have guided history have also made great achievements in the fields of philosophy, thought, politics, and economics.

In fact, the science of ancient Hittan Xiaola is the product of the combination of philosophy, and is called a classical science in the history of science.

Classical science is more through thinking and speculation, to draw logical conclusions, due to the limitations of scientific and technological means at that time, these conclusions are rarely evidenced by experimental experiments and precise observations, so there are often fallacies, such as Aristotle's belief that the speed of free fall is determined by the weight of the object, Ptolemy's geocentrism and so on. Of course, there is also Aristotle who obtained the buoyancy theorem through the buoyancy chain fighting test. However, the conclusions of this empirical verification are still less common than those of Zhilun.

It was not until the beginning of the 17th century that natural science research began to pay more and more attention to experiments and experimental methods, and the pioneer of this method was the English philosopher Francis Bacon, who pointed out in his writings that science must be experimental and inductive, and that all truths must be evidenced by a large number of conclusive factual materials, and proposed a set of experimental scientific tools and methods, such as the "three-table method".

Belief in religion does not mean superstition, and there is no religion to prove that it is conducive to the development of science.

No, there is none.

Religion is superstition.

Formal religion is to educate the world, not to bless, the precepts are stricter than the law, this shows that the level is very high, the precepts are the standard of being a person and doing things, the higher the standard!!

There is no contradiction between science and religion at all, they both complement each other. Because science is only limited to a part of human understanding, religion is beyond the scope of human cognition, so it goes beyond science. In this way, it is not difficult to understand the ideas that many scientists have not been able to understand all their lives, and finally start to believe in religion, so that they can get inner relief.

In other words, religion can solve all problems that cannot be solved by current science, so the existence of religion is very necessary.