Why does FIFA refuse to use high tech means to assist in the awarding of penalties?

There are 3 options, the first is to join the bottom line referee, the advantage is very simple, the disadvantage is that since you are still a person, it is inevitable that there will be mistakes. The second is to install Eagle Eye, the advantage is that it may be much more accurate, but there are many difficulties, first of all, technical problems, because football is different from tennis, there are often people on the goal line, especially when free kicks and corners, it is difficult for Eagle Eye to judge accurately. The third is video, which is a better way, but it is not without harm, because you can't be like the NBA, after all, the football field is too big, and there will inevitably be a place where the camera will shine, and the speed of football is very fast, and it may not keep up when the time comes.

In fact, in addition to the first one, the remaining two most fundamental reasons lie in money, because there is no problem in the World Cup, because after all, FIFA money is nothing, but you can't let FIFA burden all the qualifiers and all the games, and FIFA's purpose is to try to make all games, including amateur games, as fair as possible, so it is estimated that FIFA will let high-tech enter football in a short period of time It is difficult to conclude.

I feel like there's a little more reason for that!

Misjudgment is also a part of football, because every country has not always been victimized by misjudgment, just like philosophy says, there are good and bad, a country must have suffered the benefits of misjudgment, and the influence of misjudgment left to each World Cup after tea and dinner, no less than which country finally won the championship, has become the focus of discussion, misjudgment, sometimes it is also the charm of football, and some misjudgments will become the classic misjudgment of the century!

In fact, Blatter sometimes wants to have a few more misjudgments like the Hand of God, which is also part of football and a way to expand the influence of football, you must know that many people who don't know much about football have also heard of the phrase Hand of God, haven't they?

If the match between England and Germany is 2-1 or 2-0, then the game will be over and people will slowly forget about the Anglo-German game, but what if there is such a miscalculation?

I'm sure in the next few years, when you mention this game, you'll say: it's all the referee's fault! Blow Frank Lampard's ball out!

England is unlucky! I'm not saying that the misjudgment was warranted, but in a way, it made the game more enjoyable. 2：

A 2-2 could be defensive, but a 2-1 could force England to attack. Moreover, in such an important game, the players are nervous!

The fans are nervous! The referee is more nervous! Mistakes are inevitable, don't blame anyone!

Some things are predestined!

Referees are also people!

In fact, many things don't need to be so transparent, black-box operation, hehe, modern football is not as pure as it used to be, can the interests involved be so clear? There was no miscalculation, and no one will remember ...... years later

This question was also discussed by three hosts in a program on the Fengyun Channel, and if you use high technology, would you still order a few referees to watch there? If there is such a situation, who is it to listen to? Listen to the referee or listen to the referee who watches the high-tech?

Listen to the words of the high-tech referee, what do you want the referee to do, there is no need for a referee on the field, let 22 people play there, give the high-tech referee a flower tube, say go there, there is a buddy above who said right, misjudgment is also a kind of football, if there is no misjudgment, then football is not called football.

Football itself is a very subjective factor, and there will always be a variety of incredible sports, if according to the landlord said the introduction of high-tech to assist the referee, it is just like some countries are taught to be a mold carved out of the scholar as a tragedy, I personally think that the appropriate use of high-tech to help referees enforce the law is quite desirable, I think FIFA will also consider so.

Football is round, you never know what will happen in the next minute, and the referee is also an important factor in the game, so the referee makes the game more uncertain and makes the game full of suspense. If there was high technology, I am afraid that Maradona's Hand of God would not have become a classic. Hehe.

It's not up to anyone to decide, and even if technology is used in the future, it will take time.

In the future, you may use new gadgets to understand not many people.

I haven't used it for many competitions, but I don't dare to try it, and I'm talking about the key money, who will pay for it, and I can't wait to stuff it into my pocket.

FIFA, refusing to use high-tech to prevent miscalculations.

The huge profit income of tens of billions of gambling has made FIFA and major bookmakers agree long ago. In order to allow referees to better manipulate the game and achieve a win-win situation for both FIFA and the bookmaker, the use of high technology has been refused.

The FIFA president said: "Misjudgment makes football more attractive. Is this explanation acceptable? Why don't you just say that doping makes sports more exciting? Here's the truth: miscalculations are an indispensable tool for FIFA to make money.

Wait for two World Cups In the 22nd World Cup, technology will be used to assist referees.

Since the end of this World Cup, FIFA has begun to prepare for the use of Hawkeye technology, which has been approved by Blatter, and it may be used after the end.

Just this year, future events will use high technology!

Correction will have to be done again.

Now, the next World Cup may use electronic refereeing.

In order to maintain the authenticity of football, like the eagle eye in tennis, it has now been canceled at the French Open.

Wide visual effects, green vision, and fluent performance are the greatest charms of football. Electronic technology has actually entered football, but it cannot affect the effectiveness of football. As you can imagine, if a football penalty is offside, everyone calls up the video to study for half a day and then the penalty is awarded, and the game will not be solved in 90 minutes.

The official game of basketball is 48 minutes, and it can't be played for two hours, which is unbearable in football.

Referees make mistakes that are inevitable and could have been remedied with some advanced technology, such as Eagle Eye. But FIFA President Sepp Blatter has been vehemently opposed.

FIFA President Sepp Blatter has been opposed to using video footage to aid in the decision of a penalty during a match for two reasons: first, it would break the traditional rules of the game; Second, the introduction of video to assist in the judgment of penalties will greatly damage the fluency of the game; Third, it is difficult to reach a unified conclusion. He said:

Even with the introduction of some technology, it is the referee who executes the penalty of the game, so why replace the referee's duties in this case? And even with the video replay, the so-called experts outside the venue will have different opinions, and 10 experts will have 10 different opinions. ”

The introduction of electronic devices to help referees enforce the law needs to be based on the premise that it must not affect the flow and enjoyment of the game.

For example, if a key ball is out of bounds and out of bounds, without affecting the continuity of the game, you can consider using electronic devices to help the referee decide, but if the game is stopped for this, a group of people gather in front of the monitor to discuss whether the ball has scored or not, which is an exaggeration.

The electronic referee will be much less ornamental and inhumane.

Maybe it's to spice things up, to give everyone room to discuss, and to watch group fights when the referee misjudges.

Yesterday there was either an actor , the one who cast Kaka in the shadow .

It makes sense that good advice is here to stay.

Misjudgments are part of football and I think they are reasonable.

1. If too much use of high technology will undermine the authority of the referee. What is the use of refereeing if the referee can disagree with the decision? It's okay to have a chaotic situation.

2. Absolute fairness is ideal, but reality does not exist at all. It's consistent with life. The same goes for football.

Just as you may be sentenced to death by the court for not committing any crime. However, the benefits or losses resulting from long-term miscalculations are generally fair. Life is so unfair, because it is unfair, it is wonderful, and the same is true of football, if you can overcome injustice and achieve success, then it is a mature team, a team that people appreciate, not people who only complain about injustice.

3. Misjudgment is the charm of football. And the misjudgment has caused a lot of discussion, Xiaobei's red card, Lao Ma's hand of God, fake falls, etc. are all classics, which are topics that people talk about, if they are all fair, there is nothing to talk about.

This uncertainty in football can actually bring joy to the spectators;

There are many penalties that require the referee's subjective judgment, and high technology cannot solve all problems;

Over time, high-tech methods will be slowly applied to penalties.

In my opinion, it is best not to use "Eagle Eye", it is a human game, the referee enforces the law, and there are many penalties that require the referee's subjective judgment

Blatter fell because of the Qatar World Cup, Platini fell because of the strong pressure given by the European Football Federation, Blatter and Platini were originally two factions one to support Real Madrid and one to support Barcelona, Barcelona's Champions League win over Chelsea because of the controversy is Platini's masterpiece, and Real Madrid's major connection with Dobi is also directly related to Blatter, so I personally think that the pattern of world football lies in Ali and Figo, these two people are the popular candidates for the president of World Football Confederation.

This question is too profound... You can do a research project.

FIFA wants to make football as fake as possible.

It is said that we want to maintain the charm of football and the originality of football.

So that when there is controversy, look at the screen. Matches are often in the middle of the game. Think about how long a game lasts. Plus the emotions of the fans and players.

For fear of causing fan commotion and players boycotting the game.