Which country is the ancient slave in modern times?

Upstairs is right, but ignoring the fact that the Xiongnu later moved westward to Europe, from the bloodline of Hungary, Eastern European countries, including Russia, the proportion of the Xiongnu is very large.

The ancient Xiongnu were defeated in the Western Han Dynasty, so the Xiongnu belonged to China, but they were no longer called the Xiongnu.

The ancient Xiongnu did not stand on their own and establish a state, but gradually faded from Chinese history as an independent nation during the annexation period of the Southern Xiongnu in the 1st and 2nd centuries, and the descendants of the Xiongnu gradually changed to Han surnames after becoming Chinese residents. Most of his descendants live in present-day Shaanxi, Shanxi, Shandong, and Fujian. For example, the Jin family located in Suzhou, Jiangsu, the Jin family located in Zhaili Village, Saiqi Town, Fu'an City, Fujian Province, the Helian family located in Hebi City, Henan Province, the Jin family located in Nanxi Guzhai County, Anhui Province, the Jin family in Yuzhong Jinya Town, Lanzhou City, Gansu Province, the Jin family in Houlu Jincun, Zhengzhai Town, Pujiang County, Zhejiang Province, and the Cong family in Wendeng City, Shandong Province are all descendants of the Xiongnu Jin Riyan.

Which is not the Huns, in fact, has perished.

Yes, but it is very, very different from the slave society described by Marx.

In order to match the foot of Chinese history with the shoes of Marxism, some socialist historians insist that the Xia, Shang and Third dynasties were slave societies, the same slave societies as the ancient Greek times in Europe.

In fact, this is not the case.

The reason why this is so is because there are contradictions in the historical circles about the definition of the group of [savages] in the Zhou Dynasty.

It is already a public opinion that the countrymen are not slaves, needless to say;

Whether the savages were slaves or not, there is a lot of controversy. Socialist historians who support this stage of China's slave society, regardless of any evidence, believe that savages were slaves; A small number of opponents oppose it with a variety of sources and historical facts.

To be honest, it is not so much a slave society as a feudal society. The characteristics of its feudal society are more obvious.

Of course, China is a socialist country, and the shoes of Marxism do not match the feet of Chinese history.

Therefore, in the new "China" history textbooks, China has a slave society--- Xia, Shang and Zhou, even though the Xia, Shang and Zhou are clearly feudal political systems;

China had a feudal society--- Qin to Qing, even from the Qin Dynasty onwards, China's feudalism was already just a title, and the nobility did not even have administrative power (let alone judicial power) over the fiefdoms.

The Xia, Shang and Zhou were all slaves.

No, there was slavery in ancient China.

Slavery in China began in the Xia Dynasty, went through the Shang Dynasty, the Western Zhou Dynasty, the Spring and Autumn Period, and the slavery system gradually disappeared during the Warring States Period, and the slavery system was completely replaced by the feudal system in the Qin Dynasty and the Han Dynasty.

In the Xia, Shang, Zhou, and Qin eras, slaves were mostly born in wars, and civilians captured by the enemy became slaves, and there were also those who were demoted to slaves for crimes, and there were official slaves and private dependents.

In the Han Dynasty, the production of slaves was mainly due to the private ownership formed by land annexation, and in the last years of the Eastern Han Dynasty, the people took refuge in the owners of large estates in order to escape the war, and they also became private subordinates.

During the Han and Tang dynasties, there was a clear distinction between good and low in the law, such as a trilogy (a kind of slave) who beat a good person to death, and a good citizen killed his own subordinate, regardless of whether the tribal was guilty or not, and the tribal was not guilty and only sentenced to imprisonment and could be redeemed with money. Whoever commits the crime of rebellion, the whole family and even the whole clan must not be official slaves. Before the Song Dynasty, those who had been employed for a long time had a lower status than good people, and they were also a kind of slaves.

The conditions for a Greek-style democracy do not exist in China. The basic structure of Greece was a city-state, and each tribal group was relatively concentrated and prone to political movements. Elections are also under conditions.

In the case that the monarchy has not yet matured (China has also had this stage, the head of the tribe does not have absolute rights, and the public opinion is still very strong), some hereditary lifelong leaders have offended the anger of the people and were overthrown by the people, and the people feel that "kingship."

degree" is not good, and the system of elected consuls and the establishment of the Senate was developed. Specifically, we can refer to the process of the Romans establishing the city of Rome, going through 7 kings, expelling the king, and establishing a republic. In China, where the land was vast and fertile, the people were scattered in small villages, and there were no conditions for political campaigns and elections, and the tribal leaders gradually developed into real kings.

From the current level of archaeological research, there is no evidence that there was a slave society in China.

In the field of Chinese history, scholars from all sides hold different views on whether there was a period of "slave society" in Chinese history.

Scholars with a view of the "slave faction" represented by Guo Moruo believe that the "slave society" stage of Chinese history began in the 16th century BC with Shang Gaozu Shangjia and ended with the unification of the six kingdoms by King Yingzheng of Qin during the Warring States Period in 221 BC.

Scholars of the "slave-free school" represented by Professor Huang Xianfan and Bi Huize believe that there was no slave society in Chinese history.

Selling oneself, prisoner of war, slavery, convict of the official clan,

Plunder, prisoners of war, poor, degraded.

There were no slaves in China.

There are no slaves in the future.

They are all called domestic animals.

Just look at the zodiac signs.

Slaves are the private property of slave owners, and generally cannot be kept away from slave owners, and there is no personal freedom. The main ** is war and debt repayment, and there should be official registration in peacetime.

The people are freemen and have the freedom to act for themselves. They could also become slaves if they were captured in war or if they were in debt to pay their debts.

In times of peace, the government will not arrest people indiscriminately, after all, there is a law to follow. It's hard to say in times of war, the strong can plunder the weak.

Common: 1. Slaves have tattoos or imprints on their bodies, but civilians do not.

2, or the slave does not have the corresponding ID card, while the commoner does.

Generally, the law will stipulate that if a slave who escapes is found, he must report to the official, if he hides a slave privately, he will be punished, and in serious cases, he will even be punished as a slave. Therefore, people generally dare not do this kind of thing.

If the people of the enemy country are captured accordingly, they will also be managed by turning them into slaves through these two methods.