Canon SX20 and Nikon P100

Two machines, the SX20 is better, but it is not recommended. Recommend Fujifilm S205 to the landlord.

Fujifilm S205

Pros: Rugged, stylish, suitable for boys, although not as good as Canon SX20 and Nikon P100, but for novices it is almost the limit of handheld. The two features of SP are quite interesting.

All buttons are designed and distributed practically and comfortably. It is said that the imaging is better than the two machines chosen by the landlord. Cons:

It's heavy and tiring to hold. The main body highlights the function and often has problems. It's good to strengthen the low light.

The shutter button is a little further forward and more comfortable.

The best choice to practice DSLR, absolute value

First your question. I recommend the Nikon P100 (although the pixel is a little lower and the sensitivity is at least 160, which is not as good as the Canon) but the continuous shooting is cool.

These two machines are also about 3000, and I recommend you to buy an entry-level SLR. There are a lot of them that are a little more than 3000 and have lenses, which is very good! It doesn't matter if you don't have a photography foundation.,Just play it.,Whether you can shoot a good film in the future depends on how deep your own research is Here's a little bit of advice I hope the landlord Pay attention to the SLR.。

Although the P5100s are a little older, it is recommended to buy it.

Manual operation is good, although the sensor is CCD, the sensor size is 1 inch and much larger than the one from Canon.

Just advice. If LZ likes telephoto, then I recommend Canon.

The display of the S8000 is clear, with 920,000 pixels. The S210 is a 3-inch 230,000 pixels.

The focal length of the S8000 is 30 300mm, which is considered to be a lack of wide angles. The S210's focal length is 28 392mm, which is slightly better than the former, which is considered a small wide angle.

The S8000's metal body also feels good to hold, but zoom is sluggish. Although the Nikon S8000 offers some in-camera post-processing functions, it does not cater to the tastes of young consumers compared to similar products from Canon, Sony, Casio, Olympus, etc. At the same time, the shooting process of Panorama mode is also very complex and difficult to use, which is also a point that needs to be improved urgently.

Now, Nikon S8000** is about 2200 yuan, because it has been on the market for less than 2 months, ** moisture is higher, if you want to start, you might as well wait.

The S210 is also a metal body with a wide focal length. Since both are about 14 million pixels, the DC under this pixel cannot have a good dark light performance, and the imaging of both should be about the same.

When you buy DC, don't pay too much attention to the imaging effect. The recommended focus is:

1. Quality. 2. Appearance.

3. Display screen.

S8000 good.

4. Focal length. The sx210 is slightly better.

5. Operation. Since both are first-line brands, the landlord can choose according to the first item.

The Nikon P5100 has 1,210

10,000 effective pixels, up to ISO

The sensitivity setting of the 3200, the compositional freedom of the zoom Nikkor lens, and compatibility with accessories such as conversion lenses, where the conversion lens further extends the focal length of the wide-angle or telephoto. In addition to various automatic modes and scene modes, 4

The advanced mode also gives photographers and amateurs greater control over their cameras. coolpix

The P5100 focuses on simplifying and efficient camera operation, which can be easily operated via the mode dial.

The P5100 is equipped with one"The large LCD screen has excellent display effect, so that users can fully enjoy the fun of the large screen when using it.

Canon. The SX230HS is a new addition to the portable large zoom series, with 14x optical zoom and a focal length ranging from 28mm to 392mm, as well as a variety of full manual shooting modes and a GPS. In Canon's new generation of products, the HS has replaced IS as the product hallmark, which means that with the powerful support of the DigiC4 image processor and the 1-inch, 12-million-pixel back-illuminated CMOS, better image quality can be achieved at high ISO conditions.

Choose Canon, it's all manual. Wait until the operation is proficient and then change to a Nikon SLR.

The Canon SX20is was discontinued, and the image quality of the telephoto camera was not comparable to the others. I'll add another Canon LX5.

The P7000 was the first, then the G12, and finally the LX-5, but the difference was actually very small. All three cameras perform well at basic sensitivity, with only slight differences in image quality.

Under ISO 3200, three cameras perform in a way that would have been unimaginable 4 years ago. Here there is a clear difference between the three. In terms of details, Nikon wins, but at the cost of having to spend time dealing with the imbalance in the tone.

The Canon G12 does a good job of tonal balance, but noise in RAW files doesn't give the edges as much as I like. Basically, with the G12, you'll have to make a few different adjustments to get to the same level as the Nikon P7000. In the end, I prefer the results of G12 at ISO 3200 over P7000.

The Panasonic LX-5 is a bit strange in that it doesn't need a lot of color noise reduction in the ACR, but it does need a lot of bright noise reduction. There are pros and cons to this. In short, my rankings are Canon, Nikon, and Panasonic, but after converting the raw files, you have to be very picky to see the difference.

If I need a wide-angle lens, I'll go with the LX-5. If I need to travel, I'll go with the G12. I was satisfied with the image quality of these cameras, and aside from the firmware issues with the P7000, they were able to handle my needs.

If you think about a good deal, of course, it is the Nikon P7000.

First of all, I highly recommend the Nikon P7000

Reason: Choose DC first to see the sensor, P500, SX30is first excluded. The telephoto machine is full of floating clouds, the picture quality is poor, and the telephoto hand is spent with a shake.

For P7000 and G12 online is also debated, to be honest, the two machines have their own merits, the comprehensive performance is about the same, but the cost performance P7000 is high, because of the low price, good workmanship, retro and elegant appearance, and long focal length, in line with daily use. P7000, don't hesitate.

Of course it's expensive. The main difference is:

1. P100 has a monocular viewfinder, which belongs to a DSLR-like design, and L120 has shrunk and only has an LCD viewfinder on the back of the machine. This 21x zoom machine can only take pictures with both hands in the air like a small digital camera, and even with optical image stabilization, the stability is not as stable as the way the monocular framing can be close to the face.

2. The high ISO noise of the CMOS of the new back-illuminated Changbian is less, and the noise of the 14 million pixel traditional 1-inch CCD of the L120 has been proven to be terrible on the Nikon S8000, and the picture quality is miserable in low light. Don't judge a small digital camera by the number of pixels.

3. The shrinkage of the lens light circle, P100 is an electronically controlled leaf aperture, with the ability to adjust the depth of field, L120The aperture of this entry-level lens is a medium gray filter type, which is equivalent to always opening the aperture, and the method of inserting a gray mirror is used to reduce the aperture by two stops, and there is no ability to control the depth of field with the aperture, so the manual ** function is useless.

4. The difference between lithium battery and AA battery, lithium battery is relatively light, and AA battery cost is lower.

There are also Fujifilm's HS11 and S205 models with a high cost performance ratio, both of which have RAW storage formats, which are only available in high-end machines.