-
Examples are as follows:
Example 1: Reasoning argument. The quote from Mr. Fu Lei strongly demonstrates the value of honesty.
Example 2: Figurative argument. The author compares life to a stage, on which only sincere people can become excellent actors. In this way, the value of honesty is vividly demonstrated.
Example 3: Comparative argument. The comparison of the different practices of the two types of people highlights the value of honesty.
The role of reasoning arguments.
Make the argument authoritative and persuasive. Answer: The argumentation method of the rational argument is used to demonstrate the ......so that the argument is more generalized and deeper, and the argument is more convincing.
Note: If you cite famous quotes, aphorisms, and authoritative data, it can enhance the persuasiveness and authority of the argument; Cites celebrity anecdotes and anecdotes can enhance the interest of the argument and attract readers to read it.
Answer format: The argumentation method of citing arguments is used, by citing ......Proof ......points of view to make the argument more convincing. (Or more interesting, to entice the reader to read on).
-
These are two different concepts. Theoretical arguments are quotes, axioms, formulas, etc., that are used to prove a point; is relative to factual arguments; Justification, on the other hand, is a method of argumentation, as opposed to an example argument.
-
Theoretical arguments are famous quotes of famous people throughout the ages, and they use words rather than examples as arguments.
And the argument is your own creation to prove your point.
How can arguments and arguments be the same?
-
Summary. Arguments are the basis for proving an argument, including Taoist arguments and factual arguments. This is easy to understand, the Taoist theory includes famous sayings, axiomatic theorems and so on, as well as one's own rational perception of the world.
The factual arguments are examples. Argumentation is the process of proving an argument with evidence. Including reasoning arguments, metaphorical arguments, contrastive arguments, and example arguments.
For example, if an example is used in the process of proof in a paragraph, it is an example argument; Quoting a famous saying, it is a rational argument; What is proved by means of parables is figurative argument; What is proved by comparison is a comparative argument.
I've seen your question and I'm typing oh wait a moment Arguments are the basis for proving arguments, including Taoist arguments and factual arguments. This is easy to understand, the Taoist theory includes famous sayings, axioms and theorems, and one's own rational perception of the world. The factual arguments are examples.
Argumentation is the process by which Jing Shan proves an argument with evidence. Including reasoning arguments, metaphorical arguments, contrastive arguments, and example arguments. For example, if an example is used in the process of proof in a paragraph, it is an example argument; Quoting a famous saying, it is a rational argument; What is proved by means of metaphor is the proof of the figurative theory; What is proved by comparison is a comparative argument.
-
1. Argument by example: Demonstrate by giving specific examples, so as to make the argument more concrete and convincing.
Answer format: The argumentation method of example argument is used, and the ...... is given(summary example) proves ......(If there is a sub-argument, write the sub-argument it proves, otherwise the central argument) so that the argument is more concrete and persuasive.
2. Dao Theory Challenger Evidence: Prove the argument by reasoning, so that the argument is more generalized and deeper.
Format of answer: The argumentation method of the rational argument is used to demonstrate the ......so that the argument is more generalized and deeper.
Note: If you cite famous quotes, aphorisms, and authoritative data, it can enhance the persuasiveness and authority of the argument; Citing celebrity anecdotes and gonzo can enhance the interest of the argument and attract readers to read it.
Answer format: The argumentation method of citing arguments is used, by citing ......Proof ......points of view to make the argument more convincing. (Or more interesting, to entice the reader to read on).
3. Comparative argumentation. The role is to highlight.
Format of Answer: The argumentation method of contrastive argumentation is used, which will be ......and ......Compared with the slow potato, the ...... is highlightedpoint of view.
4. Figurative argumentation: The truth can be explained in an easy-to-understand and easily accepted manner. Make the content of the argument more vivid and vivid, and more conducive to the reader's understanding.
Answer format: The argumentation method of figurative argument is used, which will be ......Likened to ......, proving ......so as to expound the abstract and esoteric truth vividly and vividly, and it is easy to understand.
-
Difference Between Citationary Argument and Reasoning Argument:
Strictly speaking, citation argumentation is a kind of reasoning argument, and simple reasoning argumentation gives people a lack of trust because of the rigor of the argument and the source of the reason used, while citation argument mostly borrows famous quotations and universal axioms, which are more convincing than simple reasoning arguments.
1. Cite arguments.
Cite the argument is"Justification"A kind, also called"Citations", that is, the argumentation method of citing famous quotes or famous people's opinions as arguments, citing classics to analyze problems and explain the reasoning. There are two ways to quote: one is explicit citation, which explains who said the quoted words or their sources, and the other is implicit quotations, that is, they do not explain who said or came from the quoted words.
The citation method is varied and flexible.
2. Reasoning argumentation.
JustificationUsing the method of reasoning, he uses the incisive insights in classic works, famous quotes from ancient and modern Chinese and foreign celebrities, and recognized scientific principles, theorems, and formulas to prove his views. For example, the tenth paragraph of "On Reading" (the ninth text of the Renjiao Edition) lists the role of six scientific knowledge, namely, "reading history makes people wise, reading poetry makes people wise, calculus makes people think precisely, philosophy makes people think profoundly, ethics makes people think, and logic and rhetoric make people discerning" to demonstrate, and summarizes the conclusion that "knowledge can shape people's character".
The list is rich and informative, and the conclusions drawn are convincing. Because the materials cited in the reasoning argument are all scientific conclusions that have been confirmed by objective reality, or truths that have been recognized by people, they have the authority of theory and the profundity of thought, so they have irrefutable power and persuasive power.
-
Taoist arguments refer to the various theories, principles, principles, etc., that are cited in order to demonstrate a certain point of view or conclusion. Including experience and common sense, scientific principles, philosophical ideas, etc.
1. Experience and common sense.
Based on daily experience and common sense, some universally applicable principles and principles can be derived, such as "do things with a plan", "respect others", "maintain a healthy lifestyle", and so on. Support the argument by citing your own or others' experiences, such as successes, failures, etc.
2. Scientific principles.
Scientific principles are universally applicable and can be used to prove the correctness of certain arguments. Some theorems, formulas, etc., can also be used to demonstrate a certain point or conclusion. For example, the "theory of the evolution of species" in biology can be used to support the argument that all living things in nature are products of adaptation.
3. Philosophical thoughts.
Philosophical thought refers to the theories, viewpoints and ideas put forward by some famous philosophers and thinkers, which have a certain authority and persuasive power, and can effectively support the views and conclusions in the article. For example, Aristotle's "happiness is the purpose of life", "man is a political animal", and so on.
The role of the Taoist argument:
1. Strengthen persuasiveness.
Daoist arguments can enhance the persuasiveness of arguments by quoting the views and opinions of authoritative figures or institutions, real facts and data, etc., so that readers can better understand and accept the arguments. Taoist arguments can also prove the correctness of arguments through logical reasoning and argumentation, so that readers can trust and recognize the arguments.
Dao arguments can guide readers to think about problems by stimulating their emotions and emotions, empathy, etc., so that readers can understand and accept arguments more deeply. By quoting common values and beliefs, etc., the credibility of the argument can be enhanced, so that the reader is more willing to accept and believe the argument.
3. Highlight the main points of the argument.
Taoist arguments can highlight the macro focus of the argument by emphasizing the interests of the other party, the relationship between interests, and successful experiences, so that readers can pay more attention to and attach importance to the argument. In order to select and combine according to different argumentation needs, increase the diversity of arguments, make arguments richer and more comprehensive, and increase the diversity of arguments.
-
There are different example sentences for arguing different arguments.
For example, if the argument is "it's important to hurry up", you can use the following famous quote to make a reasonable argument:
1. The situation does not treat people, and it must be made into silk. — Li Bai.
2. The golden year does not come again, it is difficult to regain the morning, and the time should be encouraged, and the years do not treat others. —Tao Yuanming3, the deceased is like a husband, reluctant to give up day and night (Confucius).
4. Between the world and the world of life, if the white horse passes through the gap, it will be suddenly. (Zhuangzi) 5, the sky can be replenished, the sea can be filled, and the South Mountain can be moved. The sun and the moon are in the past, and they cannot be traced.
Zeng Guofan) 6, today and today, how little today! Not today, when is this happening! (Wen Jia, "Today's Poems").
-
Figurative argument Fish, I want too; Bear's paws, as well as I want. You can't have both, and you can't have both, and those who give up the fish and take the bear's paw are also. The argument is that what is desired is greater than that of the living, and what is evil is greater than that of the dead.
Comparative argument The township is not subject to the death of the body, and now it is the beauty of the palace; The township is not subject to death for the body, and now it is for the wife and concubine.
From two sides of your problem.
First of all, restructuring can only allow you to gain traits that already exist, such as the strength of a bear, the speed of a leopard, and the eyes of an eagle. But if you want to get a new trait, you have to wait until the gene is mutated, or you have the ability to create new genes, like God. >>>More