The Taoist argument for creativity

Imagination is the best idea.

The mind is a habit, and creation is beyond the habit, that is, beyond the mind. Spiritual practice is the way to transcend the mind and the best way to develop creativity.

When we don't know anything, we are all as creative as geniuses. The more we know, the worse our creativity becomes, until we dare not create, we will not create.

Cultivation is to let go of what we know, let go of our knowledge and mind, and enter the world of the mind, and we will have endless creativity.

After a practitioner becomes enlightened, he is amazed by the ability to burst out. In fact, everyone has these abilities, but most people's abilities are asleep and need to be developed.

Creativity is the instinct of the heart. If the mind is awakened, creativity is a natural thing.

In fact, the mind is awake and never drowsy, but our "I" is too strong and covers the mind.

Creativity refers to a person's ability to create new ideas, concepts, and methods to solve problems, as well as to achieve goals through his or her innovative thinking. It is a unique ability that not only inspires flexibility in solving problems and facing challenges, but also allows people to generate special ideas and innovative approaches.

Today, I suddenly thought of this topic and randomly said what I thought.

What exactly is creativity? The answer is given as follows:

Personally, I think that when I decide to achieve a certain goal, I first see a picture of success in my brain, and then I can put it into action to complete it. It's like when we build a tall building, we have to draw the drawings first, and then build the building. That is to say, first complete the first creation in your mind and draw it, and then build a tall building according to the drawings to complete the second creation, and turn the drawings into concrete objects, so that the goal is accomplished.

The concept of "creativity" given through the search made me see my blind spot. My focus is more specific, and I don't look at the macro aspect. Therefore, I found that I can communicate more with people when I have ideas, and I will gain more from viewing.

After learning "creativity", the next step is to implement it according to specific things, stick to it, and get results.

The understanding of "creativity" has given me new gains and discoveries, and I am really happy!

Each of us has unlimited potential and creativity, and this creativity can be applied to every corner of our lives endlessly. One of the most important questions we need to ask ourselves is not whether we are creative or not, but how can we discover and develop their potential and creativity, which is also the fundamental influence of our own creativity.

One argument is that "there are a thousand Hamlets for a thousand people", which shows that everyone has their own opinion.

Is it creative to be creative? If so, if someone's creativity hasn't been showing, can we say that person isn't creative? If so, then the counter-argument is valid.

If this is the case, can we say that a person is not creative until that person is creative? If not, then just take a celebrity, such as Newton, if he died at an early age and did not grow up, then he could not discover the law of gravitation, then according to the opposite side, should we say that he was creative or uncreative? Isn't it against common sense to define whether a person is creative or not depends on whether he can live to the point where he shows creativity?

In this case, I get an egg that a hen has just laid, and I can't say it's an egg, because whether it's an egg or not depends on whether it hatches chicks, and if the egg can't exist until that time, we can't say it's an egg in terms of creativity.

Again, creativity is strong and weak, and it must be defined.

Furthermore, creativity is related to the environment, and whether the environment causes someone to be uncreative can be said to be that the person is not creative.

The stronger the one, the feeling of being creative has a higher winning rate. When the pros and cons are debating, are the cons responding mechanically to the pros' rhetoric? Is there a table where if the positive side says something, the negative side responds to something?

Even if there is such a table, will everything that the square says appear on this table? Of course not. It is entirely possible for the positive side to creatively cite some empirical evidence, and if this empirical evidence is not on the list of the negative side, then the response of the negative side is also creative.

Finally, the proposition that everyone is creative is a bit ambiguous. In fact, just like the proposition that all crows are black, it is very difficult for you to prove it. If you want to falsify, it's very simple, the problem is that you can't falsify.

As for the argument that everyone is creative, many people think that creativity only happens in certain people. I think a lot of people are creative. It's just that everyone's ability to imagine and create is different.

Because the living conditions, the environment, and the level of education are different. So there is a big difference in everyone's understanding of creativity. Everyone has his own creativity, but he has a little more or a little less.

This argument is certainly valid. Because people's IQ and EQ are different. What's more, this is creativity

1. Galileo once threw two objects of the same material but different weights at the Leaning Tower of Pisa at the same time to refute Aristotle's view that the speed of the falling of an object is directly proportional to the weight of the object. Experiments have proved that when objects of different weights fall freely in the air, the speed of their descent is independent of the weight, and objects of different weights will fall to the ground at the same speed.

2. After thousands of experiments, the Wright brothers invented the airplane.

3. Edison invented the electric light after thousands of experiments.

4. After thousands of experiments, Marie Curie finally refined "radium".

a.Creativity is a comprehensive skill.

b.Creativity is an important factor in the realization of the ability to innovate.

c.The core of creativity is divergent thinking.

d.Creativity is the psychological quality that is necessary to successfully accomplish a certain creative activity.

Correct Answer: Creativity is a comprehensive skill.; Creativity is an important factor in the ability to innovate. At its core, creativity is divergent thinking. Creativity is the psychological quality necessary to successfully accomplish a certain creative activity.

Knowledge alone does not make a person creative. ......The real key to creativity is how to use knowledge. Utilizing knowledge and experience to find new ideas and ideas is the attitude needed to develop creative thinking.

Roger von Ezhuang (USA).