Debate Shang Ying s Variation I want to argue against the side 15

First of all, this involves the question of the standard of commenting on success and failure, similar to Shang Ying, Dong Cunrui and Huang Jiguang succeeded or failed, their sacrifice in exchange for victory in the battle, success or failure, and Shang Ying's change of law in exchange for the hegemony of Qin and the unity of China, what is he pursuing? Do you enjoy the marquis of Wanhu or the powerful Qin State? If it was the former, how could he be stupid enough to offend the Qin monarch of the Ming Dynasty, the crown prince of the dynasty, he should try his best to please the former so as to plan a good life for himself, and he could enjoy wealth forever, and Shang Ying was finally captured and killed by the system he set up, what does this mean?

Retribution? No, it shows that Shang Ying has established a set of effective systems to ensure the implementation of policies, and Shang Ying can be said to be a tragic hero who proved his success with his own death.

Square: ......##

Opposite: Shang Ying's reform was successful, and Shang Ying's personal success was also successful.

Personally, I think he succeeded in his change. And his fame. You know, everyone in this world wants to be famous for eternity. Of course, there are still a lot of mistakes in him! I advise you to support the positive side will be more beneficial. Otherwise, you may not be able to win.

I'm in favor of the anti-side, so. Let me be a guest when I pass by the precious land.

Although Shang Jun was torn apart, he will forever go down in history and leave a name for the ages. It is a hero of the ages who has realized its own value.

Although he was torn apart by the car in the end, he achieved his goal and fulfilled his wish, which can be said to be a death without regrets. You don't have to worry, even the opposite is the opposite.

1. The implementation of harsh punishment laws was one of the main reasons for the demise of Qin.

2. The high-pressure policy of culture imprisons people's minds.

3. The policy of emphasizing agriculture and suppressing business has restricted the development of commerce.

4. Hindering the development of the budding capitalism: With the development of agriculture and handicrafts, the circulation and trading of products are inevitable, and in the Ming and Qing dynasties, with the development of the productive forces and the activity of the commodity economy, the germ of capitalism in China has appeared, and at this time, the ruling class still adheres to the policy of emphasizing agriculture and suppressing business, opposes the development of commerce and agriculture, and implements a series of measures that are not conducive to the development of capitalism under the guidance of the policy of emphasizing agriculture and suppressing business, thus hindering the growth of the budding capitalism and violating the law of economic development. In this way, it loses the progressive nature of its origin.

5. It hindered the normal development of industry and commerce, resulting in the insufficient development of the entire feudal economy and the long-term continuation of the natural economy, which was one of the important economic reasons why modern China lagged behind the West. History shows that agriculture and industry are the "foundation" of the country, and only then will the country become rich and strong.

6. Leads to the excessive simplification of the economic structure;

7. Leads to the deterioration of the environment.

It was too violent, and everything else played a positive role in society at the time.