Open Book Beneficial Debate I m the square! Hurry up and get it today!

1. I think it's good to open the book. Open the book, there will be words in front of your eyes, regardless of the quality of the book, words are Chinese civilization, we accept it all the time, this is a kind of edification, more beneficial to mankind than many media (television, etc.) institutions.

2. I think open book is beneficial. Books can broaden our horizons, enrich our knowledge, make us feel the mystery of words, understand the truth, goodness and beauty in them, and have the spirit of friendship and cooperation. So books can give us a lot.

3. I think open book is beneficial. You say that there are students who read unhealthy books, and the books that are not suitable are because they have not learned to choose. Books are to be chosen.

Read different types of books at different stages. Those individual phenomena still do not deny that books are not beneficial, so we cannot jump to conclusions.

4. Specifically, there are 3 points, you can find all the benefits of books, but in your eyes, "volume" refers to books that are beneficial to us.

Therefore, as long as you read, it will be beneficial, whether it is big or small. So it can be pushed"Uncoiling is beneficial"It must be true.

As for"Unbook is not necessarily beneficial", is a neutral word, half of it is (beneficial) is true, but the other half - unhelpful - unhelpful is problematic: unhelpful, not harmful. Just like a car driving on the road, it doesn't fly into the blue sky like an airplane, can it be said that it is burrowing into the ground?

Suppose the argument is"Open book is harmful", then according to some of the arguments just now, it is natural that it can also be established, but to say"Unhelpful"That's wrong. So, on this issue, the argument of the opposing side is only half right. (And this half is still a positive argument)

Since the pro-side argument is certain to be valid, and the argument of the opposing side is only half valid, what is the reason for arguing? It is obviously invincible!

Remember a debate.

On Friday morning, our school held a unique debate on the topics of; Is open book beneficial?

The moderator, Mr. Zheng, stepped onto the brand-new podium, cleared his throat, and said, "Please send a representative from each side to the stage." I saw Chen Shuyan and Shen Yuning striding onto the podium.

Chen Shuyan said: "I think it is beneficial to open the book, because Gorky said, 'Books are the ladder of human progress,' so I think the open book is beneficial." ”

As soon as the words fell, Shen Yuning retorted: "Opening the book may not be beneficial, what if you read a martial arts book?" What's the benefit of just learning to fight and kill? ”

Chen Shuyan said: "Martial arts books also have certain benefits, let's just learn the benefits, right?" Besides, knowledge is the crystallization of people's wisdom. ”

Shen Yuning said unconvinced"Children have a strong sense of curiosity and do not know what to see and what not to see, which is harmful and can lead people to the path of crime. ”

Chen Shuyan said: "Children are curious, but we can teach them what they can see and what they can't see. ”

Shen Yuning had nothing to say.

The teacher announced that Chen Shuyan had won.

I have realized that knowledge is the crystallization of wisdom, and it is indeed very reasonable for people to say that "opening the book is beneficial"!

I think it's beneficial to open the book. Gorky said, "Books are the ladder of human progress."

Read more and you will increase your knowledge. Isn't Edison an example? He read a lot of books, got inspired by them, and did a lot of practice before he invented the electric light.

The world's famous Bacon once said: "History makes people wise, poetry makes people wise, mathematics makes people fine, naturalism makes people profound, and ethics makes people dignified." These many meanings can be summed up in one word:

Uncoiling is beneficialIf we don't read much, where will we get so much knowledge? If we don't have knowledge, how can we discern who is right from wrong?

Books are the summary of historical experience, and books are the crystallization of social culture. Reading can lead to a thorough understanding of the truth of life; Reading can give insight into the vicissitudes of the world; Reading can help people all over the world. If we don't read much, where will we get the rich words to write essays?

We read a lot, and when we see books that are not healthy for our body and mind, we can identify them as soon as we read them, and we will not read them again and buy them again.

Study! It is precisely because the opponent's defense friend has read books, and read good books, that he has cultivated such outstanding talents to participate in debates. Therefore, reading books can enable the opponent's debaters to learn debate skills, master debate materials, and make our debates more level and quality!

Doesn't this just illustrate our point of view that "open books are beneficial"?

I think it's beneficial to open the book. The origin of the benefit of opening the book is that Song Taizu said:"As long as it's reading, there's always something good".Since then, it has become an idiom that the opening of the book is beneficial.

You may be wondering, why do you talk about this? It's simple, it's key"Total"Word. This is saying that there will always be good, not only good.

Therefore, to say that the book is beneficial, it needs to be argued that reading is beneficial rather than harmful. (Don't get caught up in the opposite side.) Otherwise, you will definitely lose.

The reason will be understood after reading the following)

As far as the benefits of reading are concerned, the power is so great that it makes people realize their mistakes, change their past mistakes, go to the bright road, and achieve success; Xiao can learn a few writing methods, a few words, and even recognize a few words. These are the benefits of reading, and there is no denying it. Therefore, a few points can be made to argue that bad books also have some benefits:

First, as long as it is called a bad book, it will certainly affect people's character and lead them to the wrong path. But think about it, if those bad books can't resonate with readers and make people go deep into them, then what will happen like this? If the structure and layout of the book, the way of expression, the idea and description, the language and the wording, etc., are mediocre, or even average"Journal"It's not as good as a similar composition, so how can it resonate with readers? Therefore, no matter how bad it is, at least some writing methods can be learned in the so-called bad books, and no matter how bad it is, you can learn a few words. Can this be said to be unhelpful?

Second, whether it is a bad book or a good book, it is judged by whether the good of the book outweighs the harm or the harm outweighs the good. In other words, bad books are also beneficial.

Third, Lao Tzu in ancient China had a point of view: everything has its own two sides, and since bad books are harmful, then they must have their benefits.

But have you ever thought that even if such a book exists, can anyone read it? Will you go to see it? Since I won't go to see it, then even"Uncoiled"With this premise gone, how to talk about whether opening the book is beneficial or harmful?

Fifth, although you can cite a bunch of examples of depravity, madness, and breaking the law because of reading. So what does this mean? It can only show that the person who reads the book himself is not in the right state of mind.

That's a matter of mentality, and can't be blamed on books. Can someone take a knife to cut and kill someone, can they blame the knife for being bad?

Therefore, as long as you read, it will be beneficial, whether it is big or small. So it can be pushed"Uncoiling is beneficial"It must be true.