Seek help on the issue of determining the responsibility for rear end collision????????

First of all, this accident needs to go through the traffic police.

Motorcycles are a vulnerable group for cars, and if an injured motorcycle hits your car directly, you can almost assume that you are fully responsible.

However, the current situation involves an illegally parked car, and the injured motorcycle directly hit the parked vehicle, so the responsibility for the accident is tripartite (the vehicle you are avoiding is not responsible, this conclusion is not stipulated in the traffic law, but the care of vulnerable groups in the actual traffic police judgment).

I don't know how this accident was handled.

The normal way to deal with it is for both sides of the car to report to the insurance company, report to the traffic police, and send the injured person to the hospital.

After the traffic police arrive at the scene, there will be detailed inquiries and photos, and then the three vehicles enter the traffic police team to determine the responsibility (it is difficult to determine the responsibility on the spot for traffic accidents involving personal injuries).

It is estimated that the injured motorcycle is not responsible, and the proportion of responsibility is determined on both sides of the car.

Bear the cost of medical repair for motorcycle injuries in proportion to liability.

One thing is certain, the other party's car will not escape the involvement.

Even if he is parked normally.

As a matter of urgency, contact the company where you are underwriting your car insurance.

Hope you resolve this matter soon.

It must be the illegal car parked in front of you.

Regardless of a motorcycle in front, as far as the motorcycle accident behind is concerned, you are not responsible in this accident, the reason for the accident is that the motorcycle behind does not maintain a safe driving distance, in the case of your car braking suddenly, the motorcycle can not avoid hitting the illegal parking vehicle, in the traffic accident rear-end the vehicle in front of the vehicle should bear all the responsibility for the accident, considering that the vehicle that was rear-ended is illegal parking, and the accident has a causal relationship, so the illegal parking vehicle should also bear the corresponding responsibility, Vehicles parked illegally shall bear the secondary responsibility for the accident, and the motorcycle shall bear the primary responsibility for the accident. As for the medical expenses you pay in advance, you can seek recourse from both the primary and secondary parties after the accident is determined.

Legal Analysis: Depends on the specific situation. In traffic accidents, points and fines will be deducted only if there is a violation of the traffic law, and the demerit points are penalties for specific traffic violations, which are not directly related to the occurrence of traffic accidents, but the division of responsibility in the determination of accidents is based on traffic violations.

Legal basis: According to the provisions of the "Road Traffic Safety Law", 1. In a rear-end traffic accident caused by the rear vehicle hitting the driving front vehicle, the rear vehicle shall bear full responsibility;

2. If the front car has no tail lights at night, the front car bears the secondary responsibility for the accident, and the rear car bears the main responsibility for the accident;

3. After the front car stops on the road and fails to turn on the hazard warning flashing lights and set up warning signs according to the regulations, the front car bears the secondary responsibility for the accident, and the rear car bears the main responsibility for the accident;

4. After the front car stops on the road, the hazard warning flashing lights are turned on and warning signs are set up according to the regulations, and the rear car bears all the responsibility for the accident after the rear-end traffic accident;

5. In the case of a rear-end traffic accident caused by the over-length vehicle in front and the failure to set up obvious warning signs in accordance with the regulations, the vehicle in front bears the secondary responsibility for the accident and the rear vehicle bears the primary responsibility for the accident;

6. In the case of a rear-end traffic accident caused by the front car reversing or slipping into the rear car, the front car shall bear full responsibility for the accident.

The liability for a traffic accident caused by a rear-end collision shall be determined according to the role played by the party's behavior in the occurrence of the road traffic accident and the severity of the fault. Where all parties are at fault, each party bears primary liability, equal liability, and secondary liability; If neither party is at fault, neither party shall be liable; If one party intentionally acts, the other party is not liable. Ascend or.

Legal basis] Article 60 of the Provisions on Procedures for Handling Road Traffic Accidents.

The traffic management department of the public security organ shall determine the responsibility of the party according to the role of the party's behavior in the occurrence of road traffic accidents and the severity of the fault.

1) Where a road traffic accident is caused by the fault of one of the parties, full responsibility shall be borne by the party;

2) Where a road traffic accident occurs due to the fault of two or more parties, they shall bear the primary responsibility, equal responsibility and secondary responsibility respectively according to the effect of their actions on the accident and the severity of the fault;

3) None of the parties is at fault for causing the road traffic accident, and if it is a traffic accident, none of the parties is liable.

If one party intentionally causes a road traffic accident, the other party is not liable.

Legal analysis: The division of responsibility for rear-end accidents is as follows: 1. In a rear-end traffic accident caused by the rear vehicle hitting the moving front vehicle, the rear car bears full responsibility; 2. At night, the front car has no tail lights, and the rear-end traffic is caused by the accident, the front car bears the secondary responsibility for the accident, and the rear car bears the main responsibility for the accident.

Legal basis: Article 43 of the Road Traffic Safety Law of the People's Republic of China For motor vehicles driving in the same lane, the rear vehicle shall maintain a safe distance from the vehicle in front of which is sufficient to take emergency braking measures.

Dear dear, in traffic accidents, rear-end collisions are a common type of accident. When determining liability, comprehensive consideration should be made based on the following aspects, including:1

Whether there is a traffic violation: If the vehicle that was noisily rear-ended did not violate any traffic regulations while driving, then in general, the driver should bear the main responsibility. 2.

Distance between vehicles: If the rear-ended vehicle maintains a sufficient safety distance from the vehicle in front during driving, and brakes and slows down in time when it finds a sudden stop in front of the vehicle, but is still rear-ended by the vehicle behind, then the driver should bear the main responsibility. 3.

Evidence at the scene of the accident: For rear-end collisions, evidence at the scene should be retained as much as possible, such as vehicle damage, traces of the accident scene, etc., so that the traffic management department and the insurance company can determine the responsibility of the accident. In short, in a rear-end collision, if the rear-end driver did not violate traffic rules and maintained a sufficient safety distance while driving, and the driver did not provide sufficient evidence to prove that he was not responsible, then the driver should bear the main responsibility. 