Whether the Qing Dynasty s seclusion was good or bad

There are pros and cons! Clear**.

The policy of closing the country to the outside world was implemented for nearly 200 years, and it played a certain role in self-defense against the aggressive activities of the Western colonizers at that time. However, at that time in Western countries.

The bourgeois revolution is being carried out one after another.

and the Industrial Revolution, stepping into a new era of rapid development of productive forces. The Qing Dynasty closed itself off from the rest of the world, could not see the changes in the world situation, and failed to learn advanced scientific knowledge and production technology from the West in a timely manner, so that China gradually fell behind in the world.

Not good. Closing the country is just thinking that it is strong, but in fact, it is already a lot behind other countries, and the equipment is not good, if you can introduce more advanced things, you will not be so miserable. Moreover, the thinking is also very narrow-minded, and if we absorb more advanced ideas, we will not lose badly.

Of course, it's bad, closing the country is tantamount to "making a car behind closed doors" How can it be possible to make one's own country strong without introducing new technology or learning from other countries' advanced technology, otherwise, it is impossible to put forward the policy of "reform and opening up" in 1978. In contrast, the benefits brought about by reform and opening up are obvious to all.

There are two sides to everything. The advantage of closing the country is that it can be centrally managed and can prevent external invasions. Cut off external unfavorable factors.

The disadvantage is that it hinders the development of the economy, resting on its laurels and refusing to innovate. Eventually, the Qing Dynasty's national power declined until it came to an end. On the whole, the policy of closing the country to the outside world will do more harm than good.

Of course, the bad is greater than the good, and although the country can be closed to the country, although it can prevent some unnecessary wars and disputes in the surrounding areas, but this is the country's economy and culture can not better integrate and friction with the West and even with the world, so that the country is in a position of covering its ears and stealing the bell, deceiving itself, and finally ending up by others'Bullying'to the point of .

In the early stage, to a certain extent, it maintained social stability and resisted the role of foreign enemies, but in the long run, China gradually fell behind the world trend and made China lose its leading position in the world, after all, the prototype of the world market had been formed at that time, but China did not take the initiative to participate in it at that time, and then lost the further development of the commodity economy and the germination of capitalism, and then lost the opportunity for social change in China. (At that time, the ideas put forward by Huang Zongxi, Gu Yanwu and others already had a certain capitalist nature, and it can be said that they were by no means backward from the West.) ）

There are both good and bad, and I personally think that it is better not to close off the country, because this will make the country backward, and the tragic scene of the Eight-Nation Alliance will be staged anew!

Bad, not bad in general. Because this led to the backwardness of modern China. (If you are closed, you will fall behind, and if you are backward, you will be beaten.)

There are both positive and negative effects. Positive: The third paragraph on page 118 of the book ...... to Western colonizersSelf-defense role. Negative: However, the West at that time was ......New era.

Bad, isn't that nonsense, even if it's good, it's good for short-term interests, for the sake of current interests, ruining future generations.

A policy carried out purely for the protection of imperial power. It's basically bad.

Pros: It has played a certain role in self-defense against Western aggressors. Disadvantages: Failure to see the development of the Western powers in time has made China fall behind in modern times.

Overall, it does more harm than good.

Because this led to the backwardness of modern China. (If you are closed, you will fall behind, and if you are backward, you will be beaten).

There are two sides to everything, and it is more objective to look at the problem in two!

Or should it be viewed in two.

Positive Impact: To a certain extent, rampant maritime smuggling and piracy have been combated and restricted, and the stability of coastal areas has been positively affected. It played a certain role in self-defense against the aggressive activities of Western colonialists.

Negative impact: Cutting China off from the rest of the world and seriously hindering the budding development of capitalism. It has derailed China from the world and slowly fallen behind the world.

Culturally, economically, and scientifically, it is impossible to integrate with the world, and it is difficult to develop various advanced technological ideas, and the phenomenon of imperial twilight is presented as a whole. It is the fundamental reason for the backwardness and beating of modern China. Reducing the opportunity to contact with the outside world hinders the country's economic development and completely loses the initiative with foreign countries, blocks scientific, technological, and cultural exchanges with foreign countries, and even hinders the development of productive forces and social progress, and restricts the development of foreign countries and navigation.