Even intel has to give up the 5G baseband of mobile phones, is it difficult to develop 5G baseband?

Of course, it's difficult, so there are only one or two that can succeed, such as Huawei and Qualcomm or something.

Because 5G technology is difficult, now only Huawei and Qualcomm have the ability to do it.

It's definitely hard, 5G is a new technology, and the research and development process takes a lot of effort.

Huawei Qualcomm has a background in communication technology, while Intel does not, so it is difficult for Intel.

5G should be a big breakthrough in the network era, so it should be difficult.

It's definitely not good to develop it, otherwise I wouldn't have easily said I would have given up.

This is indeed going to encounter a lot of difficulties, which shows that our Huawei is still very good.

There must be a lot of difficulties in this, after all, the development of each technology is relatively slow.

On the morning of November 13th, Intel announced the launch of XMM81605G multi-mode baseband, which can be used for mobile phones, PCs and network equipment. According to Intel, the launch of this baseband was more than half a year ahead of the original plan.

The XMM8160 has a peak speed of 6Gbps, which is 6 times the baseband of the XMM7560LTE currently used for the iPhone XS series of mobile phones.

Intel saidThe XMM8160 baseband will ship in the second half of 2019, and the first commercial devices (mobile phones, PCs, etc.) will be available in the first half of 2020 at the earliest.

From this point of view, the probability of a new iPhone supporting 5G in the fall of 2019 will drop a lot. Of course, for Apple, there is also the first-generation 5G baseband XMM8060 to choose from.

In terms of technical specifications, the XMM8160 ruler bucket Li holds 5GSA (standalone networking) NSA (non-standalone networking) specifications, and is backward compatible with 4G, 3G, 2G, etc.

In terms of frequency bands,Covers Sub6GHz (600MHz 6GHz FDD TDD) and HFMMWaveThe former is mainly used for 2 3 4G and domestic 5G, while the latter is used in the middle and late stages of domestic 5G and the early and middle stages of 5G in Europe and the United States.

At present, Qualcomm has Snapdragon X505G baseband (5Gbps, shipped), Huawei has Balong5100 5G01 baseband, MediaTek officially announced the Heliom70 baseband (5Gbps, shipped late in 2019), and Samsung officially announced the Exynos5100 baseband (10nmlpp, 6Gbps, shipped at the end of 2018).

It's hard to get to the sky. Although Apple may use all self-developed 5G baseband chips in 2023, practitioners in the mobile phone industry remain skeptical.

Before smartphones were launched, people began to use a variety of computers, but Bixiao is completely inconsistent between different brands of computers and CPU models. This results in some brands of computers running slower and the CPU is lower-end.

In fact, in the mobile phone industry, mobile phone chips can help smart phones complete the operation. Taking Apple phones as an example, the iPhone series of phones has been facing poor signals. Therefore, the iPhone must have a very powerful processor, which is commonly known as the chip.

Judging from the current situation, Apple's self-developed 4G baseband chip has turned into cannon fodder, after all, 5G networks have become a trend.

In fact, we should understand the difference between different concepts, especially 5G baseband chips and self-developed chips. Production and sales are two links, design and production are two links. After the successful listing of the self-developed chip, it can only show that the company has independent research and development capabilities.

The research and development of 5G baseband chips is much more difficult than the former, and large technology companies need to master advanced technologies and have patents that can support the successful development of 5G baseband chips.

Time, patented technology, R&D speed, R&D environment, chip compatibility. If Apple already has a large number of 5G baseband chip research and development patents, this will increase the probability of success. However, factors such as imperfect R&D environment, slow R&D speed, and waste of a lot of time will affect the success time of R&D.

In general, there will be no uniform operating speed and carrying capacity between chips. The high-quality mobile phone manufacturing company Kaixian Huijia began to implement independent research and development, but the cost of research and development was too high. As a result, the old smart device production company decided to cooperate with professional chip manufacturers, but it was easy to be limited by this.

It's still very difficult, and whether it can be successful or not depends on what it actually is.

It's very difficult; I think Apple is likely to succeed in developing 5G chips, mainly because Apple's technological strength is still relatively strong.

I think it's very difficult to build, it's a very difficult technology to break through, and I think Apple should be able to develop it.

Snapdragon 765G and its derivative model 768G (official super 765G) are integrated 5G baseband, and the mobile phones using these SoCs are more than 1,000 and 2,000 mobile phones from Xiaomi, OPPO, and vivo, and there are many mobile phone models.

I don't know, anyway, the 865 is still an external baseband.

1. Qualcomm cannot integrate 5G baseband because Qualcomm has no right to speak in the upstream base station construction, and Huawei, Ericsson, and Nokia are the three industry giants. Huawei's microwave solution is a leading 5G solution in the field.

2. In the middle are communication service providers, which are almost all managed by the national departments, but strictly speaking, their role is more like an investor for the entire network. They spend money on equipment (base stations, antennas, etc.), and then the terminals are connected, and they charge for it. There is almost no distinction between superior and inferior technology.

3. Then there is the terminal, the core upstream industry of the terminal is the chip industry, in this area, Qualcomm dominates the 4G era, and Huawei can rank in the top five. Then there is 5G, and Huawei's 5G baseband technology ranks first in the world.

4. Qualcomm is a technology-based licensing enterprise, and its revenue is mainly divided into equipment and service income, patent licensing income, and investment income. In Qualcomm's main business, there is no base station manufacturing, in fact, this is indeed not Qualcomm's strong point. On the other hand, because of Qualcomm's own technology patent services, there is no need for Qualcomm to make a big difference in the base station, and only the patent authorization is enough.

5. Moreover, Qualcomm is different from Nokia and Ericsson, it belongs to the world's leading enterprises in 3G, 4G and 5G technology research and development, and provides technology use authorization to many manufacturers around the world, so its profit point comes from the patent wall with patents.

Summary. Because Qualcomm and Huawei are the first manufacturers to release 5G processors and 5G basebands. Qualcomm's newly released baseband X60 has better performance than other brands, and Huawei's own Barong baseband originally meant to catch up, but due to the impact of European and American sanctions, there has been no new work.

Why did Qualcomm and Huawei become the leaders of 5G baseband processors?

Because Qualcomm and Huawei are the first manufacturers to release 5G processors and 5G basebands. Qualcomm's newly released baseband X60 has a reputation for better performance than other brands in the difficult segment, and Huawei Hong's own Barong baseband originally meant to catch up, but due to the impact of European and American sanctions, there has been no new work.

Is there anything else. Without.

Okay thank you.