Huizi Xiangliang reflects what kind of character characteristics of Zhuangzi

1. In "Huizi Xiangliang", Zhuangzi is good at intellectual debate, re-appreciation, understanding of the outside world, with an appreciative attitude, and exerting subjective affection on external objects to produce empathy and empathy. If Keiko has the personality of a logician, then Zhuangzi has the style of an artist.

2. Original text. 惠子相 (xiàng) Liang, Zhuangzi went to see it. Or Keiko said:

Zhuangzi came, and wanted to replace the son. So Keiko was afraid and searched in the country for three days and three nights. Zhuangzi saw him and said:

There is a bird in the south, and its name is 鹓鶵 (yuān chú). The owl originates in the South China Sea and flies in the North Sea; Non-sycamore, non-practice, non-food, non-lien (lǐ) springs do not drink. So the owl (chī) got the rotting rat, and the bird passed it, and looked up at it and said:

Scare (hè)! This son wants to scare me with the Liang Kingdom of the son (yé)?

3. Translation. Hui Shi was the minister of state in the Liang Kingdom, and Zhuangzi went to visit him. Someone told Hui Shi

Zhuangzi (came to the Liang Kingdom) to replace you as prime minister. So Hui Shi was very frightened and searched the capital for three days and three nights. Chuang Tzu went to see him and said:

There is a bird in the south, its name is the plover, do you know it? The parrot took off from the South China Sea and flew to the North Sea, not because the plane tree did not inhabit, not because the fruit of the bamboo did not eat, not because of the sweet spring water. At this moment the owl picked up (a) rancid mouse, and the glamour flew in front of it, and (the owl) looked up and said, 'Drink!

of rebukes. Now you also want to scare me with your Liang Kingdom? ”

In the debate between Zhuangzi and Keizi, who is the winner? There has been a lot of debate about this. To sum up, there are mainly the following opinions:

1) Judging by the story itself, Zhuangzi has the upper hand. At the end, after Keizi cleverly invokes Zhuangzi's rebuttal to establish a logical reasoning, it seems that Zhuangzi should be speechless and admit defeat, but he returns to the beginning of the argument and resolves Keizi's difficulties by stealing concepts and avoiding the important. The so-called concept of stealing means that he interprets Keiko's "Anzhi" as "**knowing" or "how to know", but Keiko's original meaning is "how (can) know".

2) Logically, Keiko is the winner. As mentioned earlier, Zhuangzi was able to maintain his initial judgment in the controversy by deliberately misinterpreting the meaning of Keiko, and this practice is obviously contrary to the rules of logical judgment, so it is said that Keizi is the winner.

3) Logically, Zhuangzi didn't really deserve to lose, but he didn't find the right direction, so much so that Huizi was left with an opportunity to take advantage of. Keiko's initial question was like this: "Zifei fish, the joy of Anzhi fish?"

Implicit in this is the judgment that Huizi was able to know that Zhuangzi was "not a fish". Therefore, Zhuangzi can fully pay tribute to Huizi in this way:

If you can know that I am not a fish, I can also know that fish are happy.

The above is an analysis of the debate between the two from a logical point of view, in fact, as far as this witty text description is concerned, we do not have to worry about logic, but can look at this dialogue from the perspective of the differences in their thoughts, personalities, and temperaments. Huizi is a famous artist, eloquent, and has more of a cognitive attitude towards things that seeks the roots, lacking appreciation and care in the aesthetic sense, and naturally lacks understanding and recognition of Zhuangzi, who sincerely feels pleasure in his free and lively life.

In addition, some of Zhuangzi's ideas are also instructive for us to understand what he calls the "joy of fish". Zhuangzi pursues that "heaven and earth coexist with me, and all things are one with me" (Zhuangzi: The Theory of Things), coexist with all things equally, and are in harmony with the outside world. Zhuangzi also admired "nature" and opposed "man-made", and the fish frolicked freely in the water, which was in line with Zhuangzi's ideals, and from this, he concluded that the "happiness" of the fish was a matter of course.

First, the thinking is different.

1. Zhuangzi: Insight into Yi Li, pointing out that "Yi is Yin and Yang with the Tao", and his "Three Lai" ideas are consistent with the Tao of the Three Talents of the Book of Changes.

2. Keiko: The object of Hui Shi's "Ten Things in the Calendar" is the material world. He is good at making philosophical generalizations about the nature and laws of the material world.

In the relationship between "name" and "reality", he proceeds from the existence of reality, and admits that "reality" is the first nature, and "name" is a reflection of "reality" and is the second nature. There is a difference between his sophistry and that of Gongsun Long.

Second, the personality and temperament are different.

1. Zhuangzi: a person with lofty ideals, high self-control, wit, humor, speech, and not rare fame and fortune.

2, Keiko: A person who is obsessed with fame and fortune, forgets righteousness when he sees profit, is consumed by profit, has unwarranted suspicion, is narrow-minded, and has no opinions.

Third, the existence of the time is different.

1. Zhuangzi: c. 369 B.C. c. 286 B.C.

2. Keiko: 390 B.C. 317 B.C.

Zhuangzi and Huizi swim on the beam", in the text, the cognitive attitudes of Zhuangzi and Huizi are: Huizi argues strongly, Zhuangzi argues skillfully; Huizi seeks truth, Zhuangzi is beautiful; Huizi is obsessive, and Zhuangzi is detached.

Both sides of the debate are on topic, but the debaters think very differently. Hui Shi is from the law of cognition, people and fish are two different creatures, and it is impossible for people to feel the joys, sorrows, and sorrows of fish. Zhuang Zhou is from the perspective of artistic laws, people are happy and fish are happy.

From the perspective of cognitive laws, Zhuang Zhou's logical reasoning is pure sophistry, but this kind of sophistry is not disgusting, because Zhuang Zhou completely looks at the world with an artistic mentality, a typical "empathy" effect, Zhuang Zhou transplants his own happiness to the emotions of the fish, which in turn sets off Zhuang Zhou's happiness.

The two sides used the method of attacking the shield of the son with the spear of the son, and the debate was deepened in the most serious way. Zhuang Zhou affirmed that he could know the joy of fish, but Hui Shi denied Zhuang Zhou's statement. Not to mention who is right and wrong in this debate, just the quick thinking and wise conversation reflected by the two in the debate are amazing, giving people a pleasant and intellectual enjoyment.

Zhuangzi and Huizi.

Summary. Zhuangzi compares himself to a shark, Huizi to an owl, and fame and fortune to a rotting rat, showing his position and interest in disdainful of fame and fortune, and showing that Zhuangzi is a person with lofty ideals and not uncommon fame and fortune. It shows the pure and high quality of Zhuangzi who has no intention of fame and fortune.

惠子相 (xiàng) Liang, Zhuangzi went to see it. Or Huizi said: "Zhuangzi comes, and he wants to replace his son."

So Keiko was afraid and searched in the country for three days and three nights.

Zhuangzi compares himself to a peddle, Huizi to an owl, and fame and fortune to a rotting rat, showing that he disdains the position and ambition of fame and fortune, and shows that Zhuangzi is a person with lofty ideals and is not uncommon. It shows the quality of Zhuangzi's Qing Gao Zhen Hall who has no intention of fame and fortune. Huizi Dan 晌infiltration phase (xiàng) Liang, Zhuangzi went to see it.

Or Huizi said: "Zhuangzi comes, and he wants to replace his son." So Keiko was afraid and searched in the country for three days and three nights.

Okay, got it, thanks.

Rest early.

Okay. Good night, good night.

Don't forget to give a thumbs up.

Compare the heart] [compare the heart] [compare the heart].

Hmmm, good. Given.

1. The personality characteristics of Huizi and Zhuangzi:

Zhuangzi was a man with lofty ideals, high self-control, wit, humor, eloquence, and fame and fortune.

Keiko is a person who is obsessed with fame and fortune, forgets righteousness when he sees profit, is consumed by profit, is suspicious for no reason, is narrow-minded, and has no opinions.

2. Original text. 惠子相 (xiàng) Liang, Zhuangzi went to see it. Or Keiko said:

Infiltrate Zhuangzi to come, and want to replace the son. So Keiko was afraid and searched in the country for three days and three nights. Zhuangzi saw him and said:

There is a bird in the south, and its name is 鹓鶵 (yuān chú). 夫 (fú) 鹓鶵 originates in the South China Sea and flies in the North Sea; Non-sycamore, non-practice, non-food, non-lien (lǐ) springs do not drink. So the owl (chī) got the rotting rat, and the bird passed it, and looked up at it and said:

Scare (hè)! This son wants to scare me with the Liang Kingdom of the son (yé)?

3. Translation. Hui Shi became the prime minister of Wei, and Zhuangzi went to visit him. Someone said to Keiko:

When Zhuangzi came to Wei, he wanted (or wanted) to replace you as prime minister. So Keiko was very worried, and searched for three days and three nights in the national capital. Zhuangzi went to see him and said that the pure shout was:

There is a bird in the south, its name is 鹓雏 (yuān chú), do you know it? The chicks take off from the South China Sea and fly to the North Sea, not because the plane trees don't inhabit, not because they don't eat the fruits of bamboo, and when they don't drink the sweet spring water. At this moment, an owl picks up a rancid mouse, and the 鹓雏bird (yuān chú) flies in front of it, and the (owl) looks up at the chick and makes a 'frightened' (hè) angry sound.

Now you also want to use your Liang Guo (phase) to intimidate me? ”<

Zhuangzi and Huizi were ancient Chinese philosophers who made great contributions to the study of Taoist thought and theory, and also had an important impact on our daily lives. In terms of personality traits, Zhuangzi and Keizi have some differences:

Zhuangzi personality traits:

2.Free-spirited: Zhuangzi has a free-spirited personality and likes to pay attention to freedom and individuality.

3.Advocating Nature: Zhuangzi believes that nature is the highest moral standard, and he highly respects the freedom of nature. Autonomy and creativity.

Keiko's personality traits:

1.Strong Enterprising: For Keiko, struggle and enterprising are part of his life, and he focuses on practice and hard work.

2.Valuing order and law: Keiko attaches great importance to the meaning of order and law, believing that order and law are necessary moral values in society.

3.Strong Beliefs: Keiko has a strong belief and has always pursued and supported the things and ideas that he believes are right.

Although Zhuangzi and Huizi differed in personality traits, they were philosophically identical. They both value free thoughts and lifestyles, emphasizing the abandonment of fame, fortune and materialistic desires, believing that in this way they can achieve inner freedom and peace. In addition, they also pay attention to the relationship between nature and human beings, emphasizing that human beings should accomplish their goals in the domination and protection of nature.

In short, even though Zhuangzi and Huizi, who represent different ideas and personalities, have a lot in common in philosophy. Their ideological system occupies an important place in the history of Taoist thought, and their great ideas have had a profound influence on their later scholars. <>