Help me recommend a very good digital camera as long as the Canon, Nikon, Panasonic 40 of these thre

6000 with SLR is really not easy to match, because not only does the lens cost money, but also cards, auxiliary batteries and the like.

Now there are two most popular models in the photography industry, one is Canon's G9, and the other is Panasonic's LX2. Nikon's little machine is not too classic for the time being.

G9 just came out, and I haven't heard anything say. Panasonic LX2 I have a movie friend who is using it, I am very satisfied, the only bad thing is that there is too much noise after the sensitivity passes 400.

To clarify, although the LX2 is a small machine, the CCD size is large, it is a 16:9 wide format, and it uses a Leica lens!

Buying a camera can't just consider pixels.,Other aspects such as battery capacity,CCD size,Lens sensitivity, etc.,If you want to experience the manual function,I recommend Canon's manual model.,It's a series.,G series feels average.,It's not cost-effective.,Oh I remember playing a friend's Fuji's F10 before.,It feels pretty good.,The battery is large.,The shutter speed is fast.,The CCD is also larger than the average camera.,It seems to be 1.,You can go and see the camera that Fujifilm is out of now., It seems that I remember that it has come out to F40, so let's see zol or pconline** for details.

G9 is a good choice. I think Canon should be the best of the three brands in terms of imaging quality, but it's not cheap, Panasonic's cheaper, if you buy Canon for quality, you can buy Panasonic for you. You can go to my space to see a lot of digital camera reviews!

I recommend you to buy Nikon's.

Canon SLR does better.

I heard you say that sansung is not good.

I just bought a sansung in November.

My heart trembled, ah......

The camera is right, the person who uses the camera is wrong. Any kind of camera can shoot well!

G9 is super good!!

And Ricoh's GR series is quite good!! (more than g9).

There's no need to go for a quasi-professional level. D80. Now I think it's a bit exaggerated.

Recommended, or into the SLR D50 or D70S are discontinued, but the two films are good, I will prefer 70S, because his body is very heavy, and it feels good

I use Canon, I haven't used anything else, tell me to choose again, I'll choose Nikon

Panasonic is the most cost-effective, and the specifics are not explained, weigh it yourself. . .

The true size of the 1-inch CCD is. Entry-level SLR sensor size: x mm, full-frame SLR sensor size: x mm

High pixels do not mean that the image is good, do not increase the size of the sensor only increase the pixels, overload the sensor loses accuracy, and it is easy to appear small spots or strange colors when the light is poor.

Fashion choice Sony, photography choice Nikon, Canon, Sony video camera is very good, the camera is average, low cost performance.

If the card machine exceeds 1500, it is luxurious, and if it is less than 5 times, it will be low-end.

AA is convenient and cheap, use 2 and 2 other 2 standby, 4 charging AA is only more than 100, in case there is no power just 2 AA, lithium is expensive, in case there is no power and no play, it is recommended that Supermaster and Nanfu high-capacity rechargeable batteries.

1. Nikon S570 pixels: 12 million image sensor size: 1 inch, optical zoom 5x, equivalent to 35mm, focal length 28-140mm, about 1400 yuan, large optical variation range, good wide angle, lithium battery.

2. Canon A2000 pixel 10 million image sensor size 1 inch optical zoom 6 times equivalent to 35mm focal length 36-216 about 1400 yuan, upgraded A2100 about 1700 yuan.

3. Ricoh R8 pixels: 10 million sensor size: 1 inch primary color CCD optical zoom ratio, equivalent to 35mm, focal length 28-200, about 1600 yuan.

Fujifilm J250 pixels: 10 million Image sensor size 1 inch Optical zoom: 5x Equivalent to 35mm focal length: 28-140 about 1100 yuan.

Canon, Nikon, Sony, Panasonic screen comparison! Get to know the camera screen, electronic viewfinder.

Samsung's card machine is not good, little sheep, you will know it for a long time, Panasonic's GF2 and Sony NEX-5C are good, small and lightweight, I heard that the imaging is OK, Ricoh retro looks very good, but I haven't used it, I can't talk nonsense.

I personally prefer the Nikon D90 (even though it's discontinued) and the Pentax K-X like the Leica, which is great, but the price point is amazing.

Everyone supports the domestic product Seagull's mechanical camera is definitely a good thing, but the cost is too big.

Home Sony, SLR sports Canon, still like Nikon.

Because its quality is really poor.

Secondly, Panasonic's card machine, the main one is ultra-wide-angle, which is a special model, depending on your preferences.

As for the other brands, the card machines are pretty much the same.

As for the ixus95 and T77 you mentioned, they actually use the same CCD, which is made by Sony. From the point of view of cost performance, it is still better than Canon's ixus95.

In terms of imaging quality:

1.Telescopic lenses are better than periscope lenses.

The maximum aperture is better than the.

If you talk about general home machines, I think Samsung is better. I use Samsung myself, and at the same price compared to my friend's Sony, Canon is much better. I don't bother to say specifically. = =

I generally like Panasonic and Ricoh.

Of course, Canon's best is the best way to buy a DSLR, but if you buy a consumer card machine, I still recommend buying Panasonic, which is cost-effective.

Sony is targeting young people and attracting customers with a fashionable appearance, and it is not recommended to buy Samsung.

A few tips for you (consumer cameras).

Panasonic FH27 16.1 million pixels, 8x optical zoom, 28mm wide-angle Sony W570 16.1 million pixels, 5x optical zoom, 25mm wide-angle Sony J10 16.1 million pixels, 4x optical zoom, 25mm wide-angle.

Panasonic Home Appliance Production Giant has strong technology in product design, and it is the strongest in terms of ability except for Sony. However, there are manufacturers who are not traditional cameras, and they do not do very well in imaging.

Since Canon is a professional camera manufacturer, it has a good grasp of the imaging effect of the camera. And it has its own advantages in the field of optics, and its comprehensive strength is the best, but there are flaws in the overall design.

And Sony is a leader in the consumer electronics industry. Its camera pays more attention to fashion and convenience, and the design is also very user-friendly, but because the camera has not been produced for a long time, the imaging effect is still not perfect. However, due to the inclusion of professional camera manufacturers and Kemei, the combination of optical and electronic technology is a strong opponent for Canon in the future.

I choose Canon, the imaging is good, ** cheap.

Canon, performance imaging is top-notch.