1929 Why did the United States adopt a laissez faire policy?

Updated on educate 2024-02-27
6 answers
  1. Anonymous users2024-02-06

    Two aspects: First, capitalism and socialism were in serious opposition at that time, and the two attacked each other's social systems. Naturally, the systems they have adopted are among them.

    If the United States had taken control of the economy, then the Soviet Union would have said that the United States had taken the road of socialism: Second, at that time, Hoover in the United States did not know the economy and only believed in Keynes's liberal economic theory. That's it.

  2. Anonymous users2024-02-05

    At that time, it was not clear that it was wrong, and it was not until after the economic crisis that the inadequacy of the free economy appeared, and there was still controversy, and later after Roosfoy took office, he took a moderate intervention to make the United States out of the economic crisis and gradually prosper. See.

  3. Anonymous users2024-02-04

    The United States is a capitalist country, and laissez-faire nature is dominant, but Hoover still took some measures.

  4. Anonymous users2024-02-03

    The Libertarian Party, also known as the Libertarian Party or the Libertarian Party, is an American political party founded in 1971. It is one of the three largest political parties in the United States, with more than 200,000 registered voters and more than 600 party members holding public office, including mayor, county **** and other official positions, making the Liberal Party the largest third party in the United States. The Liberal Party's platform proclaims to implement the ideals of libertarianism, advocating the reduction of regulations, and firmly supporting a laissez-faire market economy and civil liberties.

  5. Anonymous users2024-02-02

    The essence of Hoover's response to the crisis --- to insist on limited intervention and the content of the New Deal under the premise of laissez-faire. Item A is not Hoover's measure, Item B is Hoover's measure, but later Roosevelt did not learn from this practice in the New Deal, Item C is not "intervention" but laissez-faire, Item D is an intervention but the intensity is small, only some large banks are loaned, and fewer public works are built, so it belongs to "limited intervention".

    Therefore, the answer is item d.

  6. Anonymous users2024-02-01

    d [Analysis] This question mainly tests the candidate's ability to combine history and theory, and uses Hoover's reform measures to examine Roosevelt's New Deal. The key to answering this question is to read the material, which is that some of Hoover's measures were borrowed by Roosevelt and can be answered by reversing the thinking method. Item A contradicts Roosevelt's New Deal to allow strikes; Item B is contrary to Roosevelt's New Deal; (c) Roosevelt's New Deal was an administrative adjustment of agricultural policy, not a "voluntary reduction of arable land"; The practice of reorganizing finance and building public works in item D was used as a reference for Roosevelt's New Deal.

Related questions
14 answers2024-02-27

This is because the American people have a strong, heartfelt, and naturally honest patriotic heart. It doesn't matter if they're from home, Italy, Puerto Rico, Germany, Africa, Argentina, China, Japan or Thailand. They all have a consistent sense of identity with the United States! >>>More

19 answers2024-02-27

This must be helped, if you don't help, not only will China's ** and oil plummet, but other allies will also look down on you, and you will want to cry without tears when you are really alone. The war of the United States is happening in all oil countries, and it is those countries that he has no real power to control, because oil resources are limited, and the country's economic development is a necessity, there is no development without oil, and all the oil is controlled by military means, and it controls the global economy, China's oil demand is growing, which will lead to the first oil market, and the United States, which has always regarded China as an adversary, has long been deliberately trying to suppress China, the South China Sea issue, China's once forbearance and restraint, the United States did not succeed, China's hundreds of billions of big orders allowed the United States to transfer the war, but for the time being, after Australia's U.S. Marines settled, the United States completely surrounded China in the South China Sea, and now it is the Middle East.

12 answers2024-02-27

Symptoms of illness caused by enterohaemorrhagic E. coli include abdominal cramps and diarrhea, and in some cases bloody diarrhea (hemorrhagic colitis).Fever and vomiting may also occur. The incubation period is 3 to 8 days, with an average of 3 to 4 days. >>>More

8 answers2024-02-27

The implementation of loose monetary policy, then means that the first to carry out a large number of investment, to carry out a large number of projects, the implementation of low interest rates, low tax policy, on the one hand, because of the first large investment and large projects, so that many categories are in the steel, cement and other items of the demand increase, on the other hand, low interest rates and low taxes, so that the interest group borrowing costs are reduced, the profit is also greater, which is of course conducive to the development of interest groups. However, the United States is now facing not only a situation of economic recession, if it simply blindly liberalizes its policy and implements a loose monetary policy, it will inevitably lead to further aggravation of domestic inflation, aggravation of fiscal deficits, and soaring prices, which will pose a great threat to the effective demand of residents. And the demand of interest groups is only to protect their own interests

7 answers2024-02-27

China currently has nearly $2 trillion in foreign exchange reserves, 80 percent of which are in dollars, 60 percent of which are U.S. Treasury bonds. China's holdings of U.S. Treasury bonds account for about 10% of its issuance, and if China makes a move, the world will be watching. It doesn't matter if you buy it, if you sell it, it will cause panic selling, and if the bonds in China's hands are not taken off, it will be substantial, and the US Treasury bonds in China's foreign exchange reserves will suffer painful losses, which is equivalent to not getting along with yourself. >>>More