How much money did Xiaomi Bu Children s Shoe Store lose in this transaction?

There are two answers: first, cost loss: 44 yuan.

Second, profit loss: 50 yuan.

Detailed analysis of 44 yuan: before buying shoes, the shoe store owner 0 yuan, got 50 yuan in counterfeit money for the neighbor's real 50 yuan, the boss earned 50 yuan (+50), gave 15 yuan (-15) to a pair of shoes that bought shoes, gave him 29 yuan (-29), was found by the neighbor, gave the neighbor 50 yuan (-50), that is, (+50) + (15) + (29) + (50) = -44 yuan.

Detailed analysis of 50 yuan: first of all, Xiaomi Butong shoes store took 50 yuan counterfeit money to the neighborhood for 50 yuan change, when the neighborhood knew that it was counterfeit money, Xiaomi Butong shoes store lost 50 yuan, so this process can be understood as: Xiaomi Butong shoes store took 50 yuan of real money to the neighborhood to exchange 50 yuan for change, this link Xiaomi Butong shoes store did not lose.

In addition, the transaction between the millet step children's shoe store and the young people, it is also the main link, the young people use 50 yuan counterfeit money (that is, they did not spend a penny) from the millet step children's shoes store to get a pair of shoes with a cost of 15 yuan and the recovered 29 yuan in cash, which is the loss of the millet step children's shoes store, it should be 15 29 44 yuan, if this is the case, the friend on the 6th floor will answer correctly, but is this really the case? No. Because, the Xiaomi Butong shoe store is traded with young people at 21 yuan, so if it is calculated at 15 yuan, the Mi Butong shoe store will lose 6 yuan of profit, therefore, the loss of the Xiaomi Butong shoe store in this transaction should be 15 29 6 50 yuan.

Because the neighborhood didn't lose or make money, so it only depends on how much the young man earned, he got a 15 yuan cost of shoes, plus 29 yuan in change, a total of 44, so the seller also lost 44

The millet cloth shoe store lost 73 yuan. The money taken to buy shoes is fake, that is, it doesn't cost money, on the whole, the Xiaomi store gave the shoe buyer 29 yuan + a pair of shoes, and gave the neighbor 29 yuan (took 50 from the neighbor, gave the shoe buyer 21 yuan left, and took out another 29 yuan to the neighbor). So on the whole, it lost 29 + 29 + 15 (shoe cost) = 73 yuan.

Support the first floor, 44 yuan is not very clever, the counterfeit banknote itself is 50, how can there be such an idea? The correct answer is 73 yuan, the cost is 15 + change 29 + (50-21) neighbor's change, that is, the last step is not easy to understand, that is, the owner of the Xiaomi store also pays the neighbor 29 yuan, the neighbor does not care if it is useless, but the key is that he changed the change for millet, and the change is the key!

It should be 44 yuan! (not counting profits).

The cost of millet shoes is 15 yuan + 29 yuan = 44 yuan for customers.

There is 21 yuan left in the 50 yuan exchanged with the neighbor, and 29 yuan of the 50 yuan returned to the neighbor is found in the guest, so as long as you return 50 yuan to the neighbor, it is equivalent to your own loss of 29 yuan + the cost of a pair of shoes 15 yuan = 44 yuan.

A total loss of 44 yuan.

Because the question asks about the loss of the children's shoe store, so just look at his income and expenditure...

First earn 50 yuan, then change 29 yuan, find counterfeit banknotes, compensation 50 yuan, a total loss of 29 yuan. And because the goods have been **, the loss cost is 15 yuan. Total 29 + 15 = 44 yuan.

Your thinking is wrong with the extra money, which should be the remaining $21 in change, not $29. Thank you!

50 yuan of income is counterfeit money = 0 yuan!

In addition, the customer has a pair of shoes 15 yuan + 29 yuan recovered = 44 yuan, and 50 yuan to the neighborhood.

So, the total loss is 44 + 50 = 94 yuan!!

The landlord is fascinated by the element of the neighbor, then I don't spare people, let me tell you simply.

The boss had 0 yuan in his hand at the beginning, the young man's fake money also belonged to 0 yuan, and the neighbor had 50 yuan.

The boss asked the neighbor to exchange money, which means that the real money went to the boss, the boss earned 50 yuan at this time, and the neighbor lost 50

The young man got a pair of shoes worth 15 yuan (not counting the profit) and 29 yuan of real money, which was the boss turned into a profit of 6 yuan.

The neighbor found out that the money was fake and asked for 50 yuan back, but the boss lost another 50, and the boss finally lost 44 yuan.

In the whole process, the neighbor did not make or lose, and the boss got the fake money and lost 50, but the price and purchase price of the shoes made him lose 6 yuan less, so the amount of loss was 44 yuan.

There is another way.

Quite simply, let's break it down. In the whole process, the neighbor did not make money and lost money, so he was excluded, so the money lost by the boss went to the hands of **, so the income of ** = the loss of the boss.

The thing you get is a pair of shoes of 15 yuan and 29 yuan found, and the loss is a fake money, so if you assume that the fake money is not worth anything, the income of ** is 15 + 29 = 44 yuan, and the boss loses 44 yuan.

You can use a piece of paper to record what everyone holds, change it according to the process, and finally find that the young man earned 44 yuan of things, and the boss lost 44 yuan, and you said that the fake money can't be spent that is because you calculated the fake money 2 times, and the boss lost the 44 yuan before it was included in the 50 of the fake money, but the profit difference between his purchase price and the selling price made him lose 6 yuan less.

Do you understand? If you don't understand, ask again.

If you don't do this business, then if you don't make money, you won't lose, you can't say that you don't do business, and you lose 6 yuan if you don't earn 6 yuan. Therefore, I think that if you calculate the loss, you can't include the profit from the original business, and the loss is the shoes, that is, the cost price of 15 yuan. Let's answer how much was lost in total.

Idea 1: The neighbor exchanges money with him, exchanging zero for whole money, and this process is equivalent exchange. If the 50 yuan is not fake, then the neighbor has no loss, and the boss earns 6 yuan.

However, 50 yuan is fake, so the boss pays another 50 yuan to the neighbor on top of the 6 yuan earned, +6-50 = 44, so the boss loses 44 yuan.

Idea 2: It seems that the boss gave the neighbor 50 yuan of real money and lost 50 yuan, but this is a disturbance in the way of thinking. The boss gave the neighbor 50 yuan of counterfeit money, and the neighbor also gave the boss 50 change, which is genuine money, if the neighbor does not find out, it is actually the neighbor who is damaged, because he took out 50 yuan and divided it between the boss and the young man (the boss is 21, the young man is 29).

But the neighbor found out, and the boss returned the money to the neighbor, so the neighbor had no loss. It is equivalent to putting the counterfeit money aside and ignoring it, and the boss exchanged 50 yuan (the second time) of the real money with the neighbor for 50 yuan zero real money, and the neighbor was not affected in this process, but only exchanged the whole money with zero. Then at this time, the boss lost 50 yuan, but when selling shoes, the boss got 21 yuan, that is, the boss only lost 29 yuan in cash (that is, for young people), and also lost 15 yuan in the cost of shoes, 29 + 15 = 44, and the boss lost a total of 44 yuan.

Idea 3: The neighbor found out that he received the counterfeit money and asked the boss to exchange it back, so the neighbor did not lose anything during the whole process. Then the loss happens between the boss and the young man.

What the boss loses is what the young man gets, and the young man buys shoes with counterfeit money, in fact, he doesn't give money to get a pair of shoes, and he also gets 29 yuan for change, so the boss loses a pair of shoes and 29 yuan for the young man, 15 + 29 = 44, and the boss loses 44 yuan.

Idea 4: It can be assumed that the boss has no change, and he is surrounded by 100 or 50 yuan. When the boss went to exchange money with his neighbor, he didn't take the whole 50 yuan counterfeit money, but mistakenly took another whole 50 yuan (real) next to him to exchange it for change, and the boss and the neighbor didn't lose anything in this process.

Then this worthless counterfeit money is placed next to the boss, and the boss is equivalent to getting a piece of waste paper, but when he gave the young man a pair of shoes and found the young man 29 yuan, then he lost 29 + 15 = 44 yuan.

I hope the above four ideas can give the landlord some inspiration. I think the easiest way to think about it is idea three.

The landlord has a clumsy IQ.

Profit loss or not is the difference between income and expenditure, the total expenditure of this transaction is 65 yuan (15 yuan of shoes and 50 yuan of fake money), the income is not considered fake money is 21 yuan, the fake money is 71 yuan, if you do not spend the fake money 65-21 = 44, the fake money spent is 71-65 = 6, you can not spend or not to spend to double the people, if the fake money can be spent, the function is the same as the real money, then under normal circumstances, the shoe store sells a pair of shoes is to earn six yuan, 50 yuan smashed in the hand is also a loss of 44, how can there be a loss of 94.

I first collected 50 yuan, exchanged it with my neighbor or 50 yuan, then found out 29 yuan, the remaining 21 yuan (+50-29 21), and then compensated the neighbor 50 yuan (21-50 -29), and then included the cost price of my shoes 15 yuan (-29-15 -44), and in the end, the loss of the store should be 44 yuan.

In fact, you only need to understand that a person who doesn't bring money comes to buy your things, and you make up for his money. So your loss is the money you make up for him + the cost of your shoes.

Hey, you're too complicated, the shopkeeper takes 50 fake money for real money and then returns it, the process is no different from changing it in advance, the young man takes the fake money to buy things, we think it's stealing, because he didn't give anything, he stole 29 yuan plus a pair of shoes, I am the next Ao, I want to break my titanium alloy brain, I can't figure out how to lose 94. Where did the 50 that lost go......

First of all, the fifty yuan was exchanged with the neighbor, and then it was exchanged back, so it may be considered that the fifty yuan counterfeit money has been in the hands of the shopkeeper, and the loss of the shopkeeper is the cost of the shoes and the change recovered.

The shoe store lost 44 yuan in this transaction.

If 50 yuan is not fake money, Xiaomi can earn 21-15 = 6 yuan.

If it is fake money, the net loss is 50-6=44 yuan.

In fact, it is equivalent to Xiaomi using its own real 50 in exchange for 50 change in the neighborhood, this step has no skin pulse loss, and then find a young Ranyuan person 29 yuan is a loss, a pair of shoes is a loss, the cost of 15, a total loss of 44 yuan.

Fake 50 is not worth much, it is counted as 0, so the net loss of silver jujube is 44 yuan, and if 50 is true, it will earn 6 yuan.

Obviously, the so-called satisfactory answer below is wrong.

Xiaomi children's shoes lost 94

50 yuan to return to the neighbor (-50).

Find the vertical change and give the young man the sail beam (-29).

The cost of shoes is more than 15 min

My cousin is like this.

According to the cost, the customer earned 15 yuan for shoes, plus 29 yuan for earnings, which is equal to 44 yuan, which is a loss of 44 yuan.

According to the benefits, I lost 50 yuan of fake money, and the rest did not change.

exchanged 50 yuan with the neighborhood, and later the 50 yuan returned to his hands, and Hungry Li could be regarded as a fake 50 yuan and did not change it, but borrowed 50 yuan from the neighborhood, and finally repaid 50 yuan, so it was 0 yuan.

Sell shoes to earn 21-15 = 6 yuan. Receiving 50 yuan of fake money is equivalent to losing 50 yuan. then 50-6 = 44 yuan.

So this confrontation is easy for the shopkeeper to lose 44 yuan.

The loss of the Mi Bu children's shoe store: the cost of a pair of shoes is 15 yuan, the change is 29 yuan, the change is 50 yuan and the change is 50 yuan. There is no loss.

The cost price of security is a loss of 15 + 29 = 44 yuan, and according to the profit from sales, it is 21 + 29 = 50 yuan.

Big mistake, big mistake.

That's it.

Miscalculated, yes, the customer's counterfeit money is equivalent to a piece of waste paper, so it can be assumed that he did not pay, and we instead found him 29 yuan, and gave him a pair of shoes with a line of 15 yuan, and we gave him 44 yuan for nothing.

And it doesn't matter if the counterfeit money is exchanged or not, anyway, that one is a piece of waste paper. If it is changed to 100 yuan, it has nothing to do with this. Ran Dao said that someone paid 100,000 yuan for this counterfeit currency and gave it to us.

After that, he repented and had to return 100,000 yuan. According to the above algorithm, we are not going to lose 100,000 + 15 + 29 = 100044 yuan. Hundreds of thousands, hehe!

It should be a loss of 29+15=44 yuan.

Suppose Xiaomi originally had 100 yuan, the neighbor had 50 yuan, the young man gave Xiaomi 50 yuan, Xiaomi borrowed 50 yuan from the neighbor, found the young man 29 yuan, Xiaomi also had a sliding cover tremor of 121 yuan, and gave the neighbor 50 yuan, Xiaomi still had 71 yuan, and the loss was 29 yuan, plus the cost of 15 yuan, which is equal to 44 yuan.

I believe that defeat is temporary, I don't know if it's right, you yourself are bored under the research, and you are willing to be jealous for me) Hand fight.