From a socio psychological point of view, let s talk about picking up water and eating a monk

When a monk is born, due to the need to survive, there is no possibility of escape, only to carry water by himself. In the same way, when you put someone in charge of something, he has no room for shirk, and often completes the task in time or even ahead of schedule to solve the problem satisfactorily. When two monks appear, the inertia and dependence of the person are clearly manifested, and either each monk is responsible for carrying water for a day, or they go together to carry water.

Although it seems that it is not cost-effective to carry water: two people only carry one bucket of water at a time, which is four times worse than one person carrying two buckets of water, and it is not cost-effective in terms of manpower and time. However, it is very fair, there is no excuse for not going to fetch water, and it gives them a sense of fairness.

Why are the Chinese people content with a fairly low standard of living before the reform and opening up, but after the reform and opening up, despite the obvious improvement in living standards, the people complain? This is also the reason why people prefer a lower standard of living to injustice in distribution. For example, if you and your colleagues are paid 1,000 yuan, you may not complain; But when you find that your colleague's salary is 1,200 yuan, while your own is 1,100 yuan, although his income has increased, he is more likely to question why his colleague has 100 yuan more than himself.

The focus is not on the amount of income, but on the income gap. And when the three monks appeared, the inertia and dependence of the people made everyone busy shirking their responsibilities, expecting others to take on the obligations and enjoy the fruits themselves. This can explain why the efficiency and ability to deal with things have not improved when there are more people in the ** department.

For example, when you assign several people to be responsible for solving a problem or completing a task, the process may be that Zhang San pushes the task to Li Si, and Li Si pushes it to Wang Wu. As a result, when the scheduled time comes, many things are still going around in circles with each other's shirks, and still haven't completed the task or solved the problem. At this point, everyone may shirk each other's responsibilities, find all sorts of excuses, and blame each other.

As a result, tasks may have to be postponed or postponed, and even if they are completed, it is difficult to achieve the desired results, let alone achieve more than expected results, and may even be delayed due to timing. In today's rapid development of society, the changes in the market are dazzling, and opportunities are often fleeting, and if the opportunity is delayed, it may push itself into a very disadvantageous situation.

I haven't showered in over a week, can you believe me?

Summary. Psychologist Dascher's research found that as the number of people who complete a task together increases, the level of individual effort that each person does will gradually decrease.

Just like now, most factories pay wages on a piece-rate basis, and the higher the number of pieces completed by an individual in a unit of time, the higher the corresponding salary. Employees not only get high wages, but also improve the company's work efficiency, and the company's benefits have also increased. This piecework method effectively prevents the phenomenon of social inertia, and you will take more if you do more.

What kind of psychological phenomenon is it for a monk to carry water to eat, two monks to carry water to eat, and three monks to eat without water.

The story of these three monks who have no water to drink is a classic phenomenon of social inertia, a problem of group interaction. Social inertia, also known as social inertia or social inertia, refers to the phenomenon that groups work together to accomplish something with less effort on an individual than when they do it alone. Why is this happening?

Psychologist Dascher's research found that as the number of people who complete a task together increases, the level of individual effort that each person does will gradually decrease. Just like now, most factories pay wages on a piece-rate basis, and the higher the number of pieces completed by an individual in a unit of time, the higher the corresponding salary.

Employees not only get high wages, but also improve the company's work efficiency, and the company's benefits have also increased. This piecework method effectively prevents the phenomenon of social inertia, and you will take more if you do more.

On the other hand, if the factory is paid by the hour, there is an employee in the factory who starts to be lazy, does less work, and gets the same salary. In order to complete the task, then the other employees will take on the workload of the lazy employee. Over time, other employees became dissatisfied and began to be lazy.

This is also the reason why most factories now use piecework to calculate wages. There is the phenomenon of social inertia, and on the contrary, there is also a phenomenon called the phenomenon of social inertia. An individual's awareness of others, including the increased efficiency of behavior in the presence of others, activities with others, or in the presence of electronic surveillance.

Well done this month with a salary increase. "When the big guys heard about the salary increase, they were all full of enthusiasm for the day. Since there is a social facilitation effect, there is also a kind of presence of others that not only does not improve behavioral performance, but also reduces performance.

The second is the phenomenon of social disturbance.

For example, if you are interviewing for a position, the position requires a self-introduction in English. You've been prepared for this, you've done a lot of simulations, and the pronunciation and words are fine.

However, during a formal interview, you may be nervous about the interviewer and forget a word or miss a sentence for a while. As a result, the official performance has not yet been simulated when it plays well.

The synopsis of the story is that there was a broken temple on the top of a mountain in the past, one day, a short monk was going to the broken temple on the mountain, passing through a river, because the weather was very hot, he went to the nearby pool to drink water, he came to the temple, saw that the tank in the temple was out of water, so he picked up water, added water to Guanyin's bottle, and the dry willow also revived. Soon after, a fat monk also came to the temple, because of the heat, to the pool to drink water, he came to the temple to drink the water in the temple, and picked a bucket, after which both of them were reluctant to carry water, and then they realized that this could not be done, so the two of them carried water, but the distribution was always uneven, they both wanted to take advantage, and finally the two drew a jumper on the pole, and finally calmed down the turmoil. Soon after, a thin monk came to the temple, due to the heat, to the pool to drink water, he came to the temple to drink the water in the temple, and picked a bucket, after the three were unwilling to carry water, the willow also thanked, and finally the air dried dry, rats were rampant, caused a fire, the three of them struggled to put out the fire.

After the turmoil subsided, the three worked together to fetch water. This is the story of a monk carrying water to drink, two monks carrying water to drink, and three monks having no water to drink. It's a team building issue.

The issue of getting along with others can also be considered. Each has its own ideas, and they are all thinking about themselves. Don't think about others, when you are alone, you have to choose the water you want to drink.

When two people are fair. If you don't suffer a loss, you can carry it by two people, and when there are three people, the problem will come, and no one wants to suffer. No one wants to go.

This is a matter of personal attitude. A monk carries water to drink, two monks carry water to drink, three monks have no water to drink, this is a fable, the moral is: to do one thing, if there is no system as a guarantee, the responsibility is not implemented, and there are many people who can't do it Why do three monks have no water to drink?

Because the three monks belong to the same mentality and the same state of mind, they don't want to contribute, they want to rely on others, and they pass the buck to each other on the issue of getting water, and as a result, no one goes to get water, so that everyone has no water to drink. One monk carries water to drink, two monks carry water to drink, and three monks have no water to drink. If this view were to be described in terms of management, these three views would be outdated.

The current view is that "one monk has no water, and three monks have too much water."

I haven't showered in over a week, can you believe me?

I haven't showered in over a week, can you believe me?

In fact, this is a social inertia effect.

The social inertia effect refers to the phenomenon that "the larger the group, the less effort is done". When an individual completes a certain song with other members of the group, such as encountering something, or when others are present during an individual activity, the individual often puts less effort than when he is alone, and does not contribute more when he or she does it alone, and the enthusiasm and efficiency of the individual's activities decrease. It is also called social inertia, and it is also called social interference, social weakness, social carelessness, and social slackness.

Frenchman Max Rigman did a tug-of-war.

In this experiment, he asked the subjects to tug of war in separate and group situations, and at the same time use instruments to measure their pulling force. It was found that as the number of participants increased, the average force exerted by each participant decreased. The average output of a person when pulling is 63 kg; When pulling in groups of three people, the average output is kilograms; It is 31 kg for eight people.

Correct answer: B

Analysis: B Analysis] The role of the group in promoting the retreat of individual activities is called social inertia, and "the three monks have no water to drink" is its influence manifestation.

Answer]: BSocial slackness refers to the phenomenon that when a group completes a collapse together, the individual puts in less effort than when it is done alone. As the number of people working together to accomplish something increases, the level of individual effort put in by each person decreases accordingly.

The group psychological phenomenon reflected by the three monks who did not have water transport and Bihuai drink is () aHerd. b.Crowd mimicry.

c.Social inertia (correct wisdom lead answer to friends).

d.Socially fueled.

Correct answer: c