Debate contest on whether going to school is the only way out for college students How to write a de

Summary. Going to college isn't the only way to counter the material:1Most of the basketball players in our country have a junior high school or high school education, and they can realize their life value without going to college.

2.Bill Gates dropped out of college to pursue a business career.

Debating Is going to college the only way to succeed? I'm the opposite, and going to college isn't the only way, so I'm going to bother to give me a fodder.

Going to college is not a way for Wei Hui to take hail Counter material:1Most of the basketball players of our Guomin Zhijia have a junior high school or high school education, and they have not studied in college, so they can realize their life value before sailing 2Bill Gates dropped out of college to pursue a business career.

Then how to ask the other party with your own arguments in the question session.

Get to the point: Going to college is the only way to succeed, isn't it true that you won't succeed if you don't go to college?

Combined with the cases that are not in college but are still successful, with a little language training, you can outperform each other.

Is there anything more lore than that, the kind that the other side can't refute at all.

Then you can ask him directly, you are already in college, and let him tell you what your path to success is?

It's only junior high school opposite.

This debate topic is beneficial to you, so don't worry about playing boldly.

On the other side of junior high school, you should be more bold in debating and asking directly: going to college is the only way to succeed, so if you don't go to college now, have you always failed?

I don't think I'm successful only when I go to college, so I answer Olympiad questions, get a perfect score in the exam, cook for my parents and take care of him, and I will continue to succeed.

At the same time, I hope that the opponent's defense friend can wake up as soon as possible and not live in "failure" all the time!

You're the most intelligent of the people I'm asking.

Hahaha, feel free to ask any questions, our university was once the champion of the debate team, <>

We look forward to your victory in the debate.

Positive: Exams are not only a test of learning, but also a way to promote a competitive atmosphere for learning. The cancellation of exams may bring a certain degree of lack of motivation and a decline in the learning atmosphere.

The cancellation of exams may cause many students to feel relaxed and confused about their studies. Because there was no direct competition and result. If you get used to such an environment, then let the students go to a society with fierce competition and increased pressure.

Clearly an irresponsible behavior. In summary. Obviously, universities should not cancel exams.

Against: Exams are just a test of learning. There are actually many alternatives to exams.

First of all, it is important to note that the premise of our discussion is the college student population. When we arrived at university, what we advocated and implemented was more self-directed learning that clarified our own goals. The abolition of university exams can effectively reduce the burden on students and allow most students to make better use of their university study time.

You have to understand. A student who is relatively not active in learning after canceling the pressure on his body. The results are not going to be better, obviously worse.

There are countless disadvantages of exams. Waste a lot of study time just to prepare for exams and get good grades. In fact, during the revision process, it may just be rote memorization without any progress.

The pressure that comes with grades. The rigidity and confinement brought about by the delimitation of the scope of the examination are stifling students' creativity and subjectivity in learning.

Personal opinion above. Hope it helps you ...

Are you positive or negative.

1. Why do you have to go to high school if you don't go to college. If it is enough to go to high school, then what criteria is used by the other party to judge that it is enough to go to high school. High school students go to college in the same way that junior high school students go to high school.

2. In today's highly competitive society, how to find a job without a college diploma 3. College is an important asset in life, whether it is learning or experience, it has a great impact on people's growth 4, quoting celebrities about college to enrich their own views.

The other party may say that some people have not grown up in college, and they are a waste of money, and everyone who has not studied in college is just as promising, you can refute it like this: those people are a minority after all, and with the development of society, college is almost a necessary diploma. When we decide whether or not to go to university, we don't give examples based on a few special circumstances, but from the perspective of society as a whole.

But you have to emphasize that you don't have to go to college, and if you say you have to, then you won't win the debate. As for how you explain that "to" go to college is not the same as having to, you can give an example: people need to eat, but they don't have to eat.

If the logic of the other party is followed, it is "people don't eat", which is obviously wrong.

2. Choosing a university and major that suits you can better reflect your life value, make greater contributions to society, and provide a more comfortable life for your family and yourself

Positive: Yes.

1.In today's society, the level of scientific and technological development is absolutely rapid, and what can we do with the knowledge of high schoolSome people say that you can start a business, and many big bosses have not studied in college, so let's ask, why do the bosses have to study in college when they are rich, Yao Ming's good boss should not go to Jiaotong University to study, the reason is simple, because we want to be big and erudite, I think we shouldn't be admitted to college, unless your father is Li Shuangjiang!

2.The college entrance examination is a hurdle in life, and many people have said that they don't think about whether it makes sense to be late, but resisting pressure, working hard for the college entrance examination, and even the atmosphere of the examination room, can make people grow. If you don't experience wind and rain, you can talk about the rainbow, talk about the life experience, and talk about the beautiful future.

Many people do not take the college entrance examination, not more idealistic, but prohibitive, there is a saying that a house does not sweep how to sweep the world, I think, the college entrance examination dare not succeed in the name

The above points of view can be derived to refute the opposing side's point of view, and use your own brain).

Oppose: No.

1.In fact, we are even qualified to discuss whether we should or not, because we don't know whether we have the qualifications to go to university. It's a pity that many people don't understand this and go to university, don't know where their interests are, don't know where their expertise is, blindly take the college entrance examination, blindly enter the university, so blindly graduate, so they find a job in the wrong major, so the university's educational resources are wasted, you say, should you take the university entrance examination?

2.Did you study in college?Some time ago, I saw a paragraph on the Internet**, which is a high school closed education to cultivate high-scoring students, and I am very sad to watch, but I don't know that the reaction of such students to the university, people who have been suppressed for a long time are often terrible to indulge.

There are many people who have been dropped out of college, and more college students will mix more than they can learn, and those who love to mix more than they love to learnIt's a diploma, in that case, don't sing loudly that I should go to university, it's better to be realistic: I don't deserve to go to university.

I think my point of view will be a little different, and you are more useful, at least the other side may not be able to get to this position, as for how to refute my point of view, think about it yourself, I will provide a reference, I wish the debate a pleasant time).

There's no need to debate, you have to go to college, and if you have the chance, you have to go to college.