Are the Xiongnu who attacked the Han Dynasty the same people as the Xiongnu who invaded Rome?

It's the same people. Under the blow of the Han Dynasty, the Southern Xiongnu returned to the Han Dynasty, while the Northern Xiongnu went to the West, becoming a nightmare for Western civilization. It should be that the intermarriage with a different race during the migration changed its physical appearance, but it should still have yellow blood, and it should have a face similar to that of a West Asian, as for the movie, it may be because the extras are too difficult to find.

By the way, King Arthur was the Anglo-Saxons, not the Huns.

It is the same nation, when the Xiongnu had nowhere to stay under the blow of the Han Dynasty army, and was forced to move west to Central Europe, that is, the area of Hungary (in the north of the Roman Empire), and then the Xiongnu gradually became stronger under the leadership of Attila, and kept leading the army to attack the Roman Empire, and later the Roman Empire called Attila the whip of God, and now Hungary is the descendant of the Huns.

The Xiongnu were one or two nomadic peoples who lived in Eurasia in ancient times, who established their state in the center of Mongolia, and according to linguistic inferences, there is an opinion in Mongolia that the Xiongnu are the direct ancestors of the present-day Mongols. There are also people who believe that this view is wrong, and that the direct ancestor of the Mongols should be Murwei. Later, the Xiongnu who moved to the Central Plains established local governments during the Sixteen Kingdoms period, such as Han Zhao, Beiliang, Hu Xia, etc.

There were many branches of the Xiongnu, the Xiongnu defeated by Emperor Wu of the Han Dynasty were the Xiongnu, and the Xiongnu who invaded and led to the fall of the Roman Empire were also the Xiongnu, belonging to the same ethnic group, but they were a different branch. Thank you.

Upstairs is another group of great historians....It was the Huns who brought down the Roman Empire. You all know whether the Huns and the Xiongnu are the same people, and your contribution is really extraordinaryω

Summary. In fact, the northern ethnic minorities existed before the Xia and Zhou dynasties, and in the Spring and Autumn Period, the powerful ethnic groups in the northwest were the dog Rong, and later evolved to differentiate other ethnic groups, the Xiongnu was a minority that rose later in the north, and the Warring States period began to be strong, like the Zhao State during the Warring States Period, and the Yan State all had traces of building the Great Wall to resist the invasion of the Xiongnu.

The fundamental reason for the war and peace between the Xiongnu and the Han Dynasty:

The backward slave nomads were attracted by the civilization created by the advanced feudal farming peoples, who lacked the advanced technologies of farming, iron smelting, and salt smelting that the agrarian peoples possessed.

The war between the Han Dynasty and the Xiongnu was one of the reasons for the barbarian invasion.

In fact, the northern ethnic minorities existed before the Xia and Zhou dynasties, and in the Spring and Autumn Period, the strong ethnic groups in the northwest were the dog Rong, and later evolved and differentiated other ethnic groups in Li Xiang, and the Xiongnu were the ethnic minorities that rose later in the north, and the Warring States period began to be strong, like the Zhao State during the Warring States Period, and the Yan State all had traces of building the Great Wall to resist the invasion of the Xiongnu.

The fundamental reason for the war and peace between the Xiongnu and the Han Dynasty:

The backward slave nomads were attracted by the civilization created by the advanced feudal farming peoples, and the nomads lacked the advanced technologies of farming, iron smelting, and oak and salt smelting.

The direct causes of the war and peace between the Xiongnu and the Han Dynasty: 1. The rise of the Xiongnu national power; 2 Daily needs for salt, iron, silk, etc. The direct cause of the Han Dynasty's war with the Xiongnu:

1 In the period of Emperor Wu, the country was strong; 2. The internal political environment is stable (the policy of cutting feudal domains has cracked down on the power of the kings); Only the lease and sale 3 The southern border is stable; 4 The interest of peace and kinship (temporary border tranquility) is less than the benefit of military means (depending on World War I). The Battle of Mayi opened the prelude to the Western Han Dynasty's strategic counterattack against the Xiongnu.

It can also be said that the war between the Han Dynasty and the Xiongnu was one of the reasons for the barbarian invasion, but the most direct reason for the discussion was the rise of the barbarian forces, and their demand for resources and interests would inevitably lead to contradictions.

Let me tell you, is it okay to say that history should be realistic? Huns? Joke!

It just swept through the barbarians of Europe at that time, like Goths and Alain. The Xiongnu did not pose a threat to Western Rome at all, Eastern Rome was at war with the Sassanid Dynasty at that time, and did not have the energy to deal with the Xiongnu, so they used money to sue for peace, that is, the leader of the Xiongnu when it was the strongest, Attila did not pose a threat to Rome, although Rome had fallen at that time, but the powerful army was still alive. The Xiongnu army did not flood the Roman territory, and even though they occupied Hungary, they were eventually dared back by the Germanic coalition.

The Xiongnu first appeared in Europe in 376 AD, more than 200 years after they were driven out by the Han Dynasty. At that time, the Xiongnu's ** technology could not catch up with Rome, but the iron cavalry was not prepared for the attack, and it was said that the Xiongnu only conquered some barbarians in Europe, so it was powerful.

At that time, the Western Han Dynasty, which drove out the Xiongnu, was stronger than Rome after 376 AD, and the Xiongnu always could not get rid of the fate of defeat, even if they also achieved brilliant victories, so it was the Western Han Dynasty and Rome that were strong and the Xiongnu.

The first is that 400 years later, not 200 Second, Attila was a disaster for Rome The Battle of Chalons forced Rome to join forces with the barbarians to defeat Attila, and the year after the Battle of Chalon, Attila moved to Italy and occupied many cities Hit the city of Rome and forced the Pope to persuade him to go Attila was afraid of the Roman city Because the nomads' siege warfare ability was relatively weak, but it was not afraid of the Roman army Watch a Western documentary at that time, Rome had no solution to the horse rope of Attila's army. And the Western Rome was already very weak at that time, and the Eastern Rome was only in name, just like Russia said that it was the Third Rome. The ethnic composition and culture of Eastern Rome were more like Greek, and Western Rome was Rome in the true sense of the word, but at that time he was already in turmoil.

The times are different, the strength cannot be compared, and the Han Dynasty army was able to defeat the Xiongnu out of defense. The Xiongnu swept across Europe, at that time it was the Xiongnu who were the most powerful in Europe, while Rome was already outdated, and on the whole, the most powerful was the Han Dynasty army. 100 years after the establishment of the Han Dynasty.

At that time, the economy was stable.

Rome's weapons lagged behind the Huns.

It was the Huns who brought down the Roman Empire. Whether the Huns and Xiongnu were the same people is up for debate. Now the vast majority of people ignore this, sadly.

The Huns in the Western population are not what we call the Huns!! God knows why so many Chinese people are superstitious about the stupid statement that "the Xiongnu, defeated by China, fled to the West and destroyed the Roman Empire". If we have to talk about the similarity, we can only say that they are both nomads living in Asia, there is no doubt about this.

The Xiongnu moved westward to Europe, first acquiring the territory and treasures of the Alan, and then continued westward, defeating the Ostrogoths and Visigoths, and settling in the Hungarian plain.

The Xiongnu, who were defeated by the Han Dynasty, did not really flee to Europe and destroy the Roman Empire, but fled to another place, but did not let people know.

The murderer moved westward and did not reach Europe once, but a branch later became an Attiri murderer. According to the comparison, the Han Chinese and the Europeans described their clothing, living habits, and combat methods are very similar.

You think too much, the Germanic people who destroyed Rome have always been entrenched in the west of Rome.

In the early days of the Han Dynasty, the strength was relatively weak, and the relationship with the Xiongnu could only adopt a policy of harmony in exchange for temporary peace. Later, when the Han Dynasty became stronger, it finally resolved the forced position with the Xiongnu through war.