Debate Tournament The current situation creates heroes arguments and materials

Updated on history 2024-02-19
3 answers
  1. Anonymous users2024-02-06

    Summary: First of all, clarify the definition of heroes, heroes refer to those who have made outstanding contributions to society, countries and groups, those who are extremely capable, and those who risk their lives to save the lives and property of others, then the examples are very simple, and there are many such examples in Chinese history.

    I recommend Guan Zhong and Shang YingZhang JuzhengThe political ideas of these three people have had a profound impact and even changed the trajectory of history.

    Guan Zhong advocated the use of political, economic, and legal means by the state.

    By controlling all means of subsistence and monopolizing the distribution of social wealth, the people must rely on the gifts given to the rulers if they want to survive and develop.

    This idea became the golden rule of later rulers to rule the country, and even today, the influence of Guan Zhong's thought can still be seen.

    Shang Ying completely changed the political form of later China, and most of the Chinese rulers in later generations implemented the strategy of unifying the regiment and ruling the Tang Dynasty, and Shang Yang pushed Guan Zhong's ideas to a higher level, and it took 20 years to conquer the remote and weak Qin state.

    It has become a formidable country of tigers and wolves, and even from thousands of years of history, it can be called the greatest political magic.

    Zhang Ju was another person who was able to save himself from the Zhongxing of the dynasty, and promoted the Wanli New Deal with extraordinary courage and wisdom.

    The dying Ming Dynasty was rejuvenated and laid the foundation for the next hundred years of the dynasty's life.

    In fact, it is very easy to debate that heroes create the situation, because there are so many favorable times, places and people, and the real heroes create opportunities by themselves.

  2. Anonymous users2024-02-05

    Categories: Education, Science, >> Learning Aid.

    Problem description: Thank you!! Kneel down and beg you heroes!

    Analysis: The times create heroes, and heroes also create the times, but if you only affirm one and deny the other, it is mostly wrong.

    To be honest, a lot of debate tournaments nowadays are ridiculous, and the pros and cons are wrong. )

    What I am going to talk about now involves the theory of contradiction in philosophy and the theory of evolution in biology, that is, "natural selection, survival of the fittest". All the water ghosts have to praise the envy of the foundation, ah!!

    Objectively speaking, the situation and the hero are factors that influence and promote each other, that is, two sides of contradiction. The times are like the environment, and the heroes are like the winners of a species (human). However, this case is a bit peculiar, as the hero is inherently part of the situation, i.e. there is overlap between the environment and the species.

    The situation creates heroes means that when the environment (mainly refers to the social environment) is bad, the best (heroes) of human beings stand out and become adaptors and winners of the environment. From an evolutionary point of view, this is the embodiment of species selection, survival of the fittest.

    Heroes create the situation when the environment (mainly the social environment) is changed due to the activities of the best human beings (heroes).

    Heroes and the times are cause and effect of each other, influencing and promoting each other.

    To give you a simple example:

    There was civil strife within a large tribal alliance of primitive people, and a hero with great courage appeared, (the times create heroes), and he stopped the civil strife and unified the alliance. (Heroes make the times).

    It has been said that if there is not such a person who is bold enough to unify the alliance. In this case, the current situation will evolve into a different situation. In this way, there will be a situation of two cultures.

    First, a hero with courage (worse than courage) appeared, (the times create heroes), and he stopped civil strife and unified the alliance. (Heroes make the times).

    Second, the hero has not appeared, which is miserable, and the extinction of the dinosaurs belongs to this category.

    The above is purely personal remarks, please advise if there is anything inappropriate.

  3. Anonymous users2024-02-04

    The four arguments should prepare their own things according to the arguments of their own side and the arguments of the other party who imagines the return of the plexus.

    For example, if the opponent's debate topic is that heroes create the current situation, then they may say that the creation of the current situation is inseparable from wise leadership, and without the correct leadership, there will be no change in the situation, let alone success.

    At this time, you can use your own argument as a support: if there is no environment conducive to the development of talents, if there is no situation for talents to give full play to their talents, how can the so-called heroes appear? If it weren't for the war, how could there be so many heroes in troubled times, and there must be troubled times before heroes can be used.

    Debate tournaments are also called debate tournaments, and they are also called debate meetings. In form, it is a kind of competition in which the two parties debate on a certain issue, but in fact, it is a competition of related knowledge, a competition of thinking reflection ability, a competition of language expression ability, and a competition of comprehensive ability.

    The core vocabulary of the debate competition is a debate word, just like this debate, the middle of a word, both sides of each side of the loss of a Xin, both sides of the debate are evenly matched, each side has its own arguments and arguments, both sides of the point of view can not be completely subjective to judge who is right and who is wrong, both are reasonable, both sides of the debate by virtue of their own ability to speak, with their own thinking ability and related knowledge, to strive for the victory of the debate. After the competition, the judges will score according to the scoring criteria of the debate competition and decide the winner.

Related questions
8 answers2024-02-19

Debate: Internet language poisons China's language and culture. >>>More

12 answers2024-02-19

The disadvantage of surfing the Internet is that it makes people learn badly.

14 answers2024-02-19

2.Many people spend a lot of money on things they shouldn't spend because they don't have the sense to save money. 3. >>>More

10 answers2024-02-19

It's good to take a look at this.,The composition is very easy to write.,Generally speaking, people who can speak and understand the way usually write their essays quickly.,It's just not good to say it.,Think about it yourself.,You can't always rely on copying.。

4 answers2024-02-19

Look, the opponent's defense friend also uses the Internet to find information, doesn't this just confirm our view that the benefits of the Internet for college students outweigh the disadvantages? (No): Then the opponent's defense friend is really quick and brilliant. >>>More