Whether the student uses a card machine or a DSLR machine

1.Look at your economic strength, although the SLR is now more civilian, but the cost of the later stage is large, with lenses, UV mirrors, batteries, or something.

2.It depends on what you want to shoot and what kind of effect and image quality you need. SLR image quality is good, but the performance ability is restricted by the lens, if you want to shoot macro, you have to buy a macro lens, if you want to shoot farther, you have to buy a telephoto, the general set of camera heads are relatively bad, can not play the real ability of SLR.

Although the picture quality of the card is poor, it is reasonable for daily use, and it generally comes with macro and medium telephoto, and the wide angle is also enough.

3.Portability, SLR is more troublesome to carry, and it is really tiring to go out to play, and the card is more flexible.

4.Since you are not professional at all, then don't buy a DSLR, and use an automatic transmission when you buy it, it's too wasteful. Sometimes you don't feel as good as the card shoot.

I don't recommend you to buy a SLR, in fact, the current card machine is also very professional, the effect is also very good, and it is easy to carry, such as Canon's G12, Nikon's P7000, are very good small cameras, of course, ** is also relatively high, are above 3700.

If you have any questions, you can ask me again.

I know a few students D700 with three members Leica M9 playing There are also some students 320 playing with pixel camera phones are very happy to buy a card or a DSLR It all depends on your financial strength.

The biggest advantage of SLR relative to card is that the image sensor is very large Second, there are many lens options Card machine for convenience can only have a fixed lens surface for all occasions SLR lens does not need to consider these problems Of course, the sleeve large zoom lens is also born for convenience.

I think it's enough for students to buy cards

SLRs are too expensive

But if you can

You can buy a DSLR

If only I was playing with it.

Cards are enough

SLR and card machine are not of the same grade at all, and SLR often costs four or five thousand, six or seven thousand. What about the card machine, thousands of fast. If you have the money, buy a DSLR, you get what you pay for.

You're going to give it to me. I'm also a student, and the quality of the SLR lens is generally not very good, maybe only Olympus's is stronger, but Olympus is in decline, so I don't recommend it. In addition, these pullovers are all 28mm wide angle, but none of them have a macro function, so the ability to close-up some small items and flowers and plants is much worse.

I think the advantages of SLR cards are these two things: big and good picture quality. 2.

The fast speed of single anti-focus is simply the fast response. Generally, the SLR** function is incomplete, not as good as DC. I bought a SLR and only used a sleeve, which had almost no practical effect, although it was enough.

It's better to buy a DC. You know, looking at the people on the street with SLR, with a pullover, you will definitely look down on it, this is the truth. If you don't want to study photography, just buy a DC is enough.

If you have a hobby, or a SLR, in fact, the budget will not be much, Sony, or something second-hand SLR** is very cheap.