-
Judging from the score, it is undoubtedly Chamberlain, and now Kobe, James and the like.
But in fact, it's impossible, tired you are tired, basketball not only attack, but also defend, you can't always defend under the basket, three points will shoot you, even if it is an offense, three people around it is not in vain, so, basketball is actually a collective sport, although sometimes the power of the star is very strong, but there must be the support of teammates, basketball, is not a one-person team.
-
Hehe,There must be no such people in pure 1v5.,If 5v5 organizes a one-person attack and 4 people cooperate with the offensive tactics, there are still quite a lot of such people.。 That's why Jordan got his first championship ring after 7 years. What about Kobe Bryant's years without O'Fat?
It's not that Gasol has come. When Iverson was in the 76ers, he carried the offensive banner alone, but the results are obvious to all. James, I personally like it, his personal ability and physical condition are very good, but it's not the same as being stopped by the Big Three.
In the NBA, no one is bad at individual skills, but basketball is really not a game that can be played by one person against five people.
-
If you just analyze it from the offensive end, the best should be Jordan, you can watch him score more than 50 points in the game, absolute control. The active Kobe Bryant and James, Everson is a little old, and Maddie is completely out of action.
If you count the defense, there is absolutely no one who can take on a team alone, and playing one out of five is like playing monkey hehe.
-
Let's be honest, no one can Kobe Bryant? No Even Jordan couldn't challenge any team in the NBA, because after all, he was a man, a punch was powerful, and could he beat a bunch of punches? And you have a problem with this question, what team are you talking about?
If you want to say that you can single-handedly take on an ordinary junior high school team in China, I think anyone who enters the NBA can do it!
-
You're 5-on-5, but there's only one person in a pair attacking and they're in charge of defending?
Or maybe it's just Jordan.
Because one against 5 people under the basket don't think about it. There will be someone on the outside to defend again, and there will be no less than one person.
According to the shooting percentage, there was only Jordan, an invincible step-back jumper.
There will be talk about Kobe, but there is still a difference between talent and nurture.
Kobe Bryant's Shooting Rate "Jordan.
-
No one can't, not even a throw-in.
-
Jordan, James, Chamberlain, Johnson, Iverson, Kobe, Russell, Pippen.
-
I think basketball is a teamwork.
And not by one person.
The so-called one man fights one team.
I think as long as that team works together. Definitely beaten. The peak can no longer be the peak of Iverson + Jordan + Maddie!
-
It's boring to ask.
If you say 1 pick a team.
That Kopeck's 81 should be counted.
But basketball is not a one-man game.
It's about solidarity and cooperation.
A true leader is one who wants to be more efficient.
And not their own performances.
So I think Kobe Bryant is a good leader right now.
And James is not.
-
Personally, I think that only Iverson at his peak can take on a team alone.
-
No one has this strength, five people per person. It is simply impossible to fight at the same time.
-
It doesn't seem like so, maybe you can go and make a movie like this.
-
That's impossible. So who is that? It's an alien!
-
The first was Chamberlain
There is no doubt that there are only Kobe Bryant and Jordan in this era!
You can first check on the Internet to see if there are any recruits, I don't know how much your travel expenses are, at least you have to set aside the travel expenses to go home, start a business and suffer a little first, just be able to eat enough. >>>More
The landlord still misses it, once you see it wrong, you may pay your most precious for it, and you will regret it when the time comes, (I have a friend like this) and miss it, because there is still a chance.
Love may be the feeling of love at first sight, love may be the feeling when you make a promise, and love may be the ......feeling of life and deathLove is a topic that can't be talked about endlessly. When you fall in love with someone, your heart is panicked and uneasy, you don't know how the other person feels, and you have to hide your feelings because you are a reserved person. Maybe the root of your love is a shadow in your heart, you put on a dream clothes for him, you are intoxicated in the illusion of the dream and do not want to wake up, wandering and tossing for a long time, when you know the other party's feelings, everything has been light, because you have stepped out of his shadow, his coat is no longer gorgeous, the love you hold has lost its luster, and your life has been injected with gray since then. >>>More
no.Look at whether it's selfish love or broad love. Selfish love must be possessed, and it must be possessed thoroughly. Broad love, as long as the person you love is happy.
In fact, to tell the truth, it is not painful to give up a person who loves you very much, it is painful to give up a person you love very much, it is even more painful to fall in love with someone who does not love you, it is destined to be a tragedy, some losses are doomed, some fate will never have results, you don't have to have someone to love, but you must cherish someone if you have one. Since you don't love, then let go in a word, there is a kind of love called letting go, only letting go is a kind of relief, but also a new beginning and having, let go of the burden of the mood is much easier, in the moment the tears fall turn around and leave, don't let yourself hurt, why hang on a tree without sweetness, no happiness, no happiness, people don't love you, then, how to tie up people, twisted melons are not sweet, why embarrass yourself? Why let yourself lose your self-esteem and self-love, indulge in pain, let yourself walk physically and mentally exhausted, scarred, why bother? >>>More