Excuse me, nikon 14 24 2 8 and 24 70 2 8 when shooting people...

If you're using a D700, it's not an 85mm lens because it's a full deck. Instead, you should use a 135mm lens (85mm is converted to 35mm equivalent on DX, and then 135mm). The advantage of this focal length is that it can reflect the portrait most realistically, without distortion.

Of course, the 85mm one is good even if it is used to shoot the whole frame.

Your two lenses, 14 24, are not suitable for portraits, but are more suitable for landscapes. If you shoot people, you may have noticeable distortion. Unless you want to deliberately deform to achieve some special effect, you can use it, but since you ask this question, ......That means you haven't gotten to that point in photography...

I don't have that consciousness......

The 24 70 lens is also great for portraits. I've seen a professional photographer's portrait rig with three lenses of 24 70, 70 200 and 85mm.

The lenses and cameras mentioned above ......I can't afford to buy a ......

Both of them are not as good as the 50 of 700 yuan.

These two shots aren't for that.

It's true that 14-24 can use its ultra-wide angle to shoot some full-body portraits to create an exaggerated visual effect, but the busts are still a bit choking...

Quality 14-24 is better than 24-70, that's what I came to in a week each. You can't actually ask this question, first of all, what is the quality of the bust when shooting......It's different if you shoot something else, right? Moreover, 14-24 is not used to take busts, if you want to die, you can take a picture of it.

If you insist on comparing these 2 things, then I can tell you that 14-24 is not used to shoot half body Shooting half body is definitely not as good as 24-70 It is best not to use too wide a lens to shoot people People should be deformed It is best to use a focal length of more than 50mm to shoot half body.

24-70, the portrait distortion in wide-angle shots is very strong.

If there is a header, 50mm or 85mm on the D700 is a portrait cow mirror!

First of all, if you shoot a half-length person, the lens should be 85 or 50, and the 50 here will be more widely used, and the 85 will be limited to the character. No matter what the occasion, a prime lens is definitely better than a zoom! You shoot busts with a 14-24 lens, hehe, you have to get close to the characters, and another thing you can understand is the macro lens.

Nikon's three generations of professional-grade standard variable lenses: 35-70, 28-70, 24-70. It can be said that the picture quality of these three heads is top-notch, and it is difficult to distinguish between high and low socks.

The difference is only in the imaging style. The strongest German flavor is 35-70, contrast.

Large, strong contrast, tough style, old and harmonious colors.

The 24-70 imaging style has changed a lot and is more like a Canon. The picture quality is delicate, the resolution is high, the color is elegant, the contrast and contrast are small, and the tolerance is large. 28-70 in between.

LZ has 28-70 on hand, so there is no need to change to 24-70, and the difference in picture quality is between Zhong Bo, not huge.

The advantage of the 24-70 is mainly in the extended wide angle. The 28-70 was originally Nikon's masterpiece, and its hand-polished aspherical craftsmanship and beautiful shape are unmatched by the 24-70.

I'd recommend Nikon's 16-35 F4 VR for four reasons.

1.Reason 1: Aperture.

The first parameter that should be considered in the wide-angle lens is the focal length, "wide-angle and wide-angle, the first one is wide, the aperture is not important, at least it is not important at 80% of the time", this is my teacher's original words, he said that there are very few wide-angle shots with a wide open aperture, for a large depth of field, or when shooting at a hyperfocal length, the aperture is generally in f11 or even smaller, and there is not much use for large aperture. The use of wide aperture is basically two, in order to blur the background and ensure the high speed of the shutter, it is obviously not used much in wide-angle landscape photography. Generally speaking, portraits pay attention to large aperture bokeh, but wide-angle portraits are an exception, wide-angle portraits focus on the model's curvaceous beauty and stretching (that is, long legs), then again, and F4 is indeed different in bokeh, but in wide-angle shooting, this difference is very small, I don't believe you can also try it with the lens in your hand, 16-35 F4 has VR anti-shake function, and it can also ensure the shutter to a certain extent.

My wide-angle lens is a Sigma 12-24 with a smaller aperture (, I usually shoot at f8-f11, and it feels okay.

2.Reason 2: Distortion.

16-35 has distortion, 14-24 distortion is not small to **, wide-angle lens distortion is a difficult problem to solve (or simply can't be solved), you can use the post-PS period to get it, PS has wide-angle distortion control files for the body and lens of various manufacturers, which can be adjusted.

3.Reason 3: Purpose.

14-24 is very good, after all, it is one of the big three yuan, but the zoom range is too narrow, it is inconvenient to carry, and it is basically impossible to do anything else except shoot wide angles. 16-35In addition to shooting wide angles, you can also use it as a daily hang-up head to shoot humanities, sweep the street or something, you lack a zoom hang-up head, I think this can't be missing, I use Nikon's 24-85, you still need one for this focal length.

4.Reason 4:**. 14-24 is about 2000 yuan more expensive than 16-35, plus you have to rebuy the filter, the cost is indispensable, 16-35, at least the filter does not need to be repurchased.

1. It is zoom, and zoom imaging is not as good as fixed focus. But the Nikon 24-70 is the better of the few SLR lenses, at least better than Canon's performance.

2. It is a commonly used focal length. Able to meet most shooting needs. The best choice for the hang-up head.

3. The zoom composition is convenient, which can improve work efficiency, and the wide-angle and medium focus are often the most commonly shot scenes, so it is more efficient to use it than to use it separately, and there is no need to change the head frequently.

24-70 is the best focal length of each wide angle to medium focus and 70-200 can be seamlessly connected.

As for what you said about the wide angle and telephoto, the Canon 50 is not long, not short, but **more than 10,000.

The Nikon 28 14D is neither long nor short, but also more than 10,000.

The lens is not looking at the focal length.

Look at imaging and technology.

This head imaging, color, distortion control, and focusing speed are all superior and unaffordable, drooling.

The 24-70mm head is a portrait. Wedding photo studios everywhere have this lens from 24-70mm.

It's normal.

It's impossible to do it all in one lens and one company. There must be a division of labor. Let's create together.

I don't understand, don't blame me for being wrong.

The role of the Nikon 14-24 lens with a large aperture:

Large aperture is a standard for measuring the lens, ultra-wide angle and large aperture itself are opposing problems, but they are mutually supportive, 14-24 is ultra-wide angle Because now the use of wide-angle lenses is more wide, not a simple landscape, there is time to shoot still life, the visual impact is better, and when the scenery is in the small scene, the prominent subject is used with a large aperture, and the large aperture is not necessary to use the lens aperture is generally better in the imaging .

VR is not necessary, because at the wide-angle end, even the jitter has little impact on the imaging of **, 14 and 16 are different2, but the visual impact is much worse.

Advantage 1: Average and excellent resolution performance.

2. There are very few purple edges.

3. Accurate color reproduction.

4. The focus is quiet and fast, and the focus is resolute.

Disadvantage 1: There is no advantage in the minimum focusing distance.

2. The texture of the mirror body is not strong.

3. The edge image quality needs to be improved.

4. The price is more expensive than the same level.

The AF-S 24-70mm F ED, because of its practical focal length, is most suitable as a standing hang-up head. With the support of ED, SiC, Nano Crystal Coat, ASP, IF, SWM and other technologies, it is not difficult for the AF-S 24-70mm F ed to become the "Mirror Emperor". In fact, the AF-S 24-70mm F ed also shows the king demeanor it deserves.

Excellent resolution with good image usability at maximum aperture; With the support of Nano Crystal Coat and SiC, there are very few purple fringing; Accurate color reproduction, with D3 almost no color cast. 24 The focal length of 70mm can be used for portraits, and the bottom can be used to shoot large scenes, and if it is not a problem with the nearest focusing distance, even the macro can be inserted.

The lens is what you pay for, one of Nikon's three artifacts for the common people.

24-70? A Nikon zoom lens with excellent performance, very good, if it is not too high, it is recommended to have one per person!

Nikon zoom bull head, constant aperture, **12600 yuan.

One of the big ternions, a standard zoom lens, a lens of high quality.

The angle of view of the 24-70 on the full-frame body can meet the general wide-angle needs, but if you are shooting a large scene, the wide angle of 24mm is still a little lacking, and I am afraid that it will not be able to fully capture the grandiose momentum. So if you're keen on shooting landscapes, especially the desert, grasslands, seas, mountains, and other big scenes, it's still necessary to get a wide-angle lens with a larger perspective.

The general comment of 16-35 is that the distortion at the wide-angle end is slightly larger, but if you're shooting landscapes rather than horizontal and vertical lines, it's not a big problem.

Personally, I like the 14-24 very much, but this lens is a bit cumbersome to protect due to the protruding structure of the front lens group, and the cost of adding various filters is also high.

The most critical is the focal length problem, 14-24 has a shorter focal length coverage, this lens is more used to shoot landscapes, if you want to shoot humanistic themes at the same time, I am afraid you need to keep changing the lens, at this time the advantages of 16-35 are reflected.

Which lens you choose depends on your individual shooting needs.

14-24 focuses on shooting landscapes, imaging, color, distortion are very good, large aperture, is also a wide-angle lens that other brand users are coveted, but it is not easy to protect, the focal length coverage is relatively narrow, the use is relatively single, the weight is also heavier, and the portability is slightly poor.

The 16-35 imaging is slightly inferior to the 14-24 ratio, and the f4 aperture is slightly smaller at some times, but the image stabilization function can also ensure the shutter speed to a certain extent, and the focal length is more practical, suitable for hang-up, and relatively lightweight.

Must be 14-24! Diamond gold wide angle is not covered!