I am a top floor resident and have some legal knowledge about the top floor that I would like to con

Tell you from the truth! If the user of the penthouse does not have the right to occupy the roofing platform, the building developer will not sign any agreement with you to agree that the top floor will be sold to you. The top floor of a high-rise residential building is a fire refuge area, and setting up security doors without permission is a practice that disregards the personal safety of other owners.

As for the theft of residents in the community, this kind of thing can completely ask the property management company for compensation. But with the exception of temporary facilities or property that you build on your roof! Because those buildings themselves are illegal.

Usually, the top-floor residents have a geographical advantage, and they can set up a place to dry their clothes and dry their lives. But definitely not private property. This is what the fire code says.

1. The anti-theft door is already illegal, the connection between several buildings is for escape, a building can escape from another building if it is on fire, you are illegal to do so, if there are serious consequences, you are responsible.

2. The responsible party should find the property, but they are not in place.

3. The illegal construction is certain and has changed its use.

4. It stands to reason that the rooftop does not belong to anyone, because it does not belong to a certain person, and the stairwell goes to the roof, which means that it meets the "Code for Fire Protection Design of Buildings".

I don't know if the rooftop you are talking about here is the roof, if so, then I am the above. That means the rooftop is above you.

The right to use the roof belongs to all the owners, not the residents of the top floor.

According to the relevant provisions of the Property Law, if the property rights of the owner of the top floor in the purchase contract do not include the roof, and the roof belongs to the owners in common, since it belongs to the public space of the community, the right to use the public space belongs to all the owners, and the right of supervision belongs to the community owners' committee. Therefore, the right to use the roof is not reserved for the top floor users.

You don't want to use the terrace, unless the developer gives you a contract, generally the door in the public area has the property to manage, the door is generally locked you can't go up, let alone a small place, if no one cares about the chickens, ducks, geese, all casually you live without worrying, the place is managed by the property, you put a solar water heater should be able to, but also negotiate with the property, if the property does not agree to give him two cigarettes on the line or more, Generally, there is a property manager in each building who manages the building, and it is basically okay to find him.

I feel that the chance that you can get a place is basically not large, because I am doing property management, I can recommend to you a bad note, looking for the owner of the top floor to go to the sales office, to make trouble how to compensate you something, such as free parking or something, it depends on how you make trouble.

Then it depends on whether there is a property, if there is a property 1 may belong to the property, how to use the property is not your business, 2 belong to your own property management fee.

What is your standard of strata fees?

For an 8-storey commercial house, the developer promised to have the right to use the top floor of the top terrace for individuals, but has not yet joined the supplementary agreement, and will add a supplementary agreement in the future, but the agreement is only for the top floor residents.

In other words, the right to use the top floor can be used by anyone who lives on that floor. Not your personal personal belongings.

This can be reported to the property first, let them mediate, or you can respond to the relevant departments, the latter communicate with him alone, his behavior is indeed not allowed, you should be able to sue him.

Go to the property first to respond to the situation, and ask the property to deal with it, if the property ignores it, you can go to the relevant departments to report the situation.

If you complain about the urban management, the urban management bureau will also manage the illegal buildings.

1. The sky is shared by all, and you can't stop others according to the law.

2. Because the roof is shared by the public, the house is leaking, and you can ask everyone to pay. If others don't want to pay, you can lock your head up. (It's up to you to be bold enough).

It's a reasonable question.,You just make it clear.,The roof of your house.,Unless everyone pools money to keep you from leaking rain and insulation.,Whoever moves it over and smashes whom.。。 Isn't that easy?

If they are not convinced, let them sue. Is China a place of reason?

You don't have the right to keep them out, but if they break your insulation, you'll need to ask for an explanation.

It is true that there is no right not to let others put it, but the problem of the thermal insulation can be said separately. You learn how to discuss it.

As long as the area of the balcony is recorded on the real estate deed, it is included in the area of the house, and if it is an apartment, it is generally considered to be shared by all owners. You can refer to the "Property Law"!

Regardless of whether there is a top or not, as long as you have the drawing area of the balcony in the real estate certificate, or the developer at that time said in writing that it was given to you, it is yours, if there is a recorded area according to the recorded area is not calculated according to the measured area, but it needs to be recognized by the Real Estate Bureau for the record, otherwise it is not an illegal building, or it is shared by all owners, it is recommended that you go to the property to ask!

The terrace on the stairwell, with a height of 6 meters and a roof, how to calculate the area?

Question: I am on the 6th floor to send a terrace, there are stairs from the house to expose the platform, the floor area on the 5th floor is 155 square meters, and the same type of house mine is 161 square meters, is it reasonable?

Answer: If it is a balcony, the area of the house payment at that time should be calculated according to the area of 155 square meters, but the actual area is 161. This is reasonable, if he calculates your house payment according to 161, it is unreasonable.

Question: According to 161, the terrace is gifted, and the unit price is expensive, is there any basis for this?

It is said that the height of the stairwell is more than 6 meters, and it is counted as 2 floors.

It's easy to answer. The purchase contract clearly gives away the balcony, so it is impossible to include it in the area that needs to be paid, and it is definitely unreasonable to calculate it according to the actual area. This does not need a legal basis, and the contract can be seen.

That doesn't make sense, I think.

Where can I find the relevant basis for the question? to be able to argue with reason.

If there are partial floors in a single-storey building, the second floor and above of the partial floor shall be calculated according to the horizontal area of the periphery of the enclosure structure if there is an enclosure structure, and the horizontal area of the bottom plate of the structure shall be calculated if there is no enclosure structure. If the floor height is above and above, the total product should be calculated; If the floor height is insufficient, 1 2 area should be calculated.

The indoor clear height of the kitchen and bathroom should not be less than meters; The net distance between the lower surface of the drainage pipe and the floor and ground in the kitchen and bathroom shall not be less than one meter, and shall not affect the opening of doors and windows.

As far as floor height is concerned, the Residential Design Code stipulates that "the floor height of ordinary residential buildings should be meters", which indicates that a slight choice is allowed in the matter of floor height, that is, the floor height does not have to be meters, but the "indoor clear height" must comply with the mandatory provisions of the Residential Design Code.

You can take a look.

In terms of construction, a balcony without a roof is not counted as an area.

This is a serious violation of the law.

Article 70 of the Property Law of the People's Republic of China stipulates that the owner shall have the ownership of the exclusive parts such as residential and commercial buildings in the building, and shall enjoy the right of common ownership and joint management of the common parts other than the exclusive parts. The exclusive part refers to the private space in which we live, while the common part includes the corridor, façade, roof, etc.

China's "Property Law" and "General Principles of the Civil Law" stipulate that to change the form and use of public parts, it should be decided by the owners, and a single owner has no right to allocate and use them without authorization. That is to say, the act of planting vegetables and flowers on the roof must be signed and agreed by the owners before planting. Otherwise, the owner can sue the vegetable grower in court for embezzlement of public property.

The legal ways are: 1. Tell the property about the relevant legal provisions and make it clear that this is an illegal act;

2. Tell the tenant through the property that it is clear that this is an illegal act; and a written notice of rectification shall be issued by the property;

3. Go to the street to report and ask the street to stop such illegal acts.

Because this is a very clear violation, you don't need to go through the judicial route, you just need to report it. If the neighborhood committee, property, and street do not stop it, it is a ** act of inaction. Then you can go to the higher level of the street and report it.

Hello, what you said about the verdict has come down means that the verdict has been served on both parties.

The first issue is that, of course, the defendant has passed the appeal period and cannot file an appeal. The appeal period for civil cases is 15 days, calculated from the date on which the defendant receives the judgment or signs for receipt by mail.

The second issue is that if the plaintiff does not appeal, and the defendant does not appeal beyond the appeal period, the case will take legal effect, and if the defendant fails to perform its obligations within the performance period determined in the judgment, the plaintiff may apply to the court for compulsory enforcement, and the court will not ask about other factors.

1. The appeal period is 15 days after receiving the judgment, if the judgment is not served by public notice, then the judgment has taken effect 15 days after receiving the judgment, and it cannot be appealed; If it is a public notice service, it is also necessary to see whether the announcement expires, the announcement period is generally 60 days, and the expiration of the announcement period is deemed to be served, and the judgment will take effect 15 days after the expiration of the announcement period, which means that the appeal period cannot be appealed after the expiration of the appeal period. 2. According to the relevant provisions of the Civil Procedure Law, the time limit for applying for enforcement is 2 years, that is, within two years after the expiration of the performance period stipulated in the legal document, it is possible to apply for enforcement, at this time the legal document has taken effect, the parties cannot appeal, and the court will not consider whether the defendant has appealed.

Personal opinion.

I don't know if the defendant received the judgment or not, but it started from the receipt of it, and 8 months have passed since it was received. However, in many cases, the service of judgment depends on the service of public notice.

It is not known when the announcement was issued, and the judgment took effect 75 days after it was issued, although it is rare, but it cannot be ruled out that there is a delay in the court.

The period for appeal shall be counted from the date of receipt of the judgment or ruling.

15 days for civil judgments and 10 days for civil rulings.

If the accident caused the factory and mine did not violate their safety obligations, they would not be liable.

If these workers have signed an employment contract with your father, it has nothing to do with the factory.

If they are compensated, you can ask a lawyer to investigate whether it belongs to you, and if so, then it is possible that they are insurance fraud. You can negotiate with them on this condition.

Whether or not the factory can be sued depends on the responsibility of the factory in the accident and contracting.