What are the argumentation ideas of a paragraph, what are the argumentation ideas

The test points of the argumentation ideas include:

1. Identify the structure of the proposal;

2. Divide the paragraph level for the proposal;

3. Explain the writing ideas of the discussion;

4. Summarize the main points of paragraphs and sections;

5. Identify the method of argumentation.

1. Grasp the linguistic signs that point to the structural ideas. Candidates should learn to grasp key words, sentences (language signs) and paragraphs, and accurately extract and summarize the answer information. The stylistic characteristics of the discussion are distinct, and the language expression is standardized, so it presents a certain law in expression.

If you set up a question table to open the following, the discussion will be discussed in depth; "No coincidence" is a form of obedience; "Say it again" table advancement; The "admittedly" table turns into the opposite argument; "In short" the table scores are summarized; "Same" table analogy, reasoning, etc.

2. Understand the general structure and ideas of the proposal. "Asking a question (presenting an argument or thesis) - Analyzing the problem (proving the argument) - Solving the problem (drawing a conclusion or reinforcing the argument)" This is the general structure of the discussion. Candidates need to pay attention to the manner in which the argument or thesis is presented; how the author argues around the argument from what aspects; The article is structured in such a way as a total score (total score, total score), a layered approach, or a side-by-side comparison.

I hope it can help you, and I hope you are satisfied.

Argumentation ideas generally refer to the method of argumentation.

3. Theoretical argumentation: The purpose is to prove that the argument is universal and regular.

4. Figurative argumentation: the truth is easy to understand, the language is vivid and vivid, and it is easy to be accepted.

5. Cite arguments: Quote famous sayings or quote some ordinary people's statements to make them more authoritative and popular, and make the argument powerful.

6. Causal argument: let people figure out the cause and effect of things, and the ins and outs.

7. Arguments of positive and negative: right and wrong are clear, right and wrong are clear, which is impressive and makes the argument more powerful or attractive.

Not the same. "Argumentation idea" generally refers to the method of argumentation, and argumentation refers to the proof of one's own point of view after expounding it, so that one's own point of view has been confirmed; The idea of argument means a theoretical description, a single or inductive exposition of one or many problems, events, research, etc., and the problems or solutions that exist in them are described in their own words, so the structure of argumentation and the idea of argumentation are different.

Types of argument structures:

1. Juxtaposition (the levels and paragraphs of the article are parallel, and there is no distinction between primary and secondary).

2. Contrast.

3. Layer-by-layer (layer by layer, step by step, one ring after another, there is a small to large or shallow to deep way to explain the truth thoroughly.) Layered complex sentences: not only ......And ......And wait).

4. Total fractions: total - points, points - total, total - points - total.

"Argumentation idea" generally refers to the method of argumentation, and argumentation refers to the proof of one's own point of view after expounding it, so that one's own point of view has been confirmed; Argumentation methods mainly include example argumentation, truth argument, positive and negative argument, metaphorical argument, case argument and other argumentation methods.

3. Factual argumentation: also known as example argumentation, is a method of argumentation from materials to opinions, from individual to general, and is a form of reasoning that summarizes a common conclusion from the analysis and study of many individual things. In this way, it is generally a matter of first dividing the argument and then concluding it, that is, putting forward the thesis straight to the point, then using materials to prove the argument layer by layer around the topic, and finally summarizing the conclusion.

This method of structure is more in line with the laws of people's thinking and understanding.

4. Reasoning argumentation: The purpose of reasoning argument is to prove that the argument is universal and regular. Since arguments are generally abstracted from concrete materials, their essence is induction, which is difficult to complete under many conditions.

Therefore, if there is a theory to measure it, its reliability can be guaranteed.

Argumentation ideas generally refer to the method of argumentation.

Argument ideas and answering methods.

1. Look at the score. 2. Stratification (looking for the whole).

3. Related words.

First of all, ......Then ......And then ......Finally ......

4. Methods of argumentation.

Answer template. The article begins with a ......This argument leads to ......Thesis;

Then use ......Arguments, ...... arguments...... was carried outanalysis;

Then from ......Angle Use ......The method of argumentation is to argue from both sides of the argument;

In the end, ...... was obtainedThe conclusion of the emphasis ......The central argument of the ......The call to ......of hope.

Argumentation ideas generally refer to the method of argumentation.

But this is not the mainstream, and then enumerate the fact that those who are close to ink are not black and analyze the reasons. It is also possible to first argue that those who are close to ink are not black, and point out that this is the mainstream of the times, and then explain in a small amount of space that people who are close to ink are black.

But not the main aspect in real life. Such a structural layout not only achieves a clear point of view, but also avoids one-sidedness. Generally speaking, this layout is often used when dialectical analysis is required for the ontology part.

The order is as follows:

1.What arguments were made.

2.What method of argumentation is used to demonstrate the central thesis.

3.What conclusions have been drawn.

The argumentation ideas are contrasting and layered.

1.Point 2Argument Method 3Summary.

Reading is a matter of patience and perusal.

The first argument, the second method, the third conclusion.

1. Facts and arguments use true, reliable, and representative examples to prove the arguments, specifically and effectively prove the central arguments, enhance the persuasiveness, interest, and authority of the article, and make the article easy to understand.

2. Reasoning arguments can enhance the persuasiveness or style of the article, making the argument more powerful or attractive.

3. The comparative argument is correct and wrong, and the right and wrong are clear, which is impressive, and makes the argument more powerful or attractive.

4. Figurative argumentation: the truth is easy to understand, the language is vivid and vivid, and it is easy to be accepted.

The idea of argumentation is actually very simple, that is, he wants to demonstrate how a point is demonstrated, for example, "First of all. And then ......Secondly.

In this way, the juxtaposition method is used to make the argument, (according to the structure of the article, what is the total score, progressive...).The kind of argument that first establishes a point of view and then argues this is called "argument", or puts forward a few other people's views, and then argues to prove that their own point of view is a "refutation", almost, that's what I understand it to be like this, I've done such a question, and the argumentation idea is not equal to the argumentation method. (The first time I answered the question, I may not be very clear, I hope I can help you).

Argumentation refers to the method and way of thinking that expresses one's own views through a series of reasoning, analysis, citing evidence, etc., and makes the views more convincing and credible.

It is based on logic and coherence, and aims to make the reader or listener aware of the acceptance or agreement with the author's point of view through effective argumentation.

A good argument line of thought needs to state the problem clearly and provide hard evidence to support one's point of view, as well as identify other positions or objections that can be pretended.