I m going to participate in a debate on the topic of college education is not market oriented

Thank you, the moderator, the judges, and the audience.

1. What is the role of donating money and materials to support the development of poverty-stricken areas?

2. Is it the same to ask the opposing party to have books and not to have books, and to have a good teacher and not to have a good teacher?

3. Why is the education level better in areas with good economic development than in economically backward areas?

4. Do you think education needs a cost? How can education be carried out without cost?

5. Generally speaking, teachers in economically developed areas are better than those in economically backward areas, do you think it is right If the other party says it is wrong, you say: the opponent has to deny even the facts in front of him, and your words are not credible.

For the rest, you should follow up on the spot, and the questions should be short, not too long questions.

May I ask the other party's defense friend, if the development of education is the premise, what about you to get money to get a good education? If the economy of this urban area is not developed, will the level and quality of education be very high?

First of all, the essence of education is to improve the quality of education, and it cannot be injected too much utilitarian and so on. There is also the impact of market orientation on the growth of students, which is not conducive to hobbies and hobbies, and the future is full of unknowns, changing rapidly, the market has changed, and the gains outweigh the losses for a long time. Finally, education should be based on the long-term and future-oriented, and universities should have a correct attitude, because students have blind obedience, and their understanding of themselves is not deep enough, and they can develop their potential, but they cannot be oriented.

Heck, a lot, debate is two extremes, to see who can drag who through.

In short, it is to start from the three aspects of education, school, and students. You first think about how you will drag you over if you are positive, and then look for the flaw in this thinking, in fact, you can also think of the positive point of view, it depends on whether your previous preparation is sufficient. He will definitely focus on employment, so you can talk to them about what the value of life is.

In fact, think about whether market-oriented is respect for education, respect for students, education innovation, is a long process, any professional existence has its necessity, should respect the laws of nature, inappropriate majors, inappropriate learning methods, will inevitably be eliminated naturally, it is estimated that you are preparing for the debate competition, should also be a veteran, I have an axe in this class, just prepare seriously. I saw this answer online: university education should not be market-oriented.

The other side will certainly support their argument that "university education should cultivate talents needed by society, and now it is a market economy, so university education should be oriented to the market economy."

I think the most important thing for you to grasp is that university education is about adapting to the needs of society, but it doesn't mean that it should be market-oriented.

First, the market economy is interest-oriented, and more emphasis is placed on developing the economy and maximizing interests.

2. University is a kind of education, and education should take into account the improvement of the quality and competitiveness of the whole country, and cultivate all-round talents.

Third, cultivating all-round development of qualified personnel does not mean that we should be guided by the market economy, but now we are running schools under the guidance of the market economy, and many problems have arisen in China's education system.

Fourth, university education should be oriented towards cultivating talents and promote the all-round development of people.

And that's what he said, and you can take advantage of it!! Adapting to the needs of society is not the same as being market-oriented.

You ask him what is market orientation? Enterprises not only pay attention to the needs of customers, but also attach importance to competitors, and strive to find a balanced marketing concept between customer needs and competitors, called"Market-oriented"。This is also important, right?

Civilization should not be regulated by law, we are the opposite, it is civilization that should not be regulated by law, help think about it, if the positive side takes Singapore as an example, what should we do? I'm a debate, how can I not let the other party find a flaw, thank you. The debate began on 29 November, and time was running out.

It depends on the correctness of the market. Anyway, the market represents the masses. Should 8

There should be university education - that is, higher education.

Solution: University education should, not must"One-size-fits-all"The marketization of the land does not mean that the standards and rules of the market economy should be implemented in all fields and links of university education.

Focusing on the market is a method, means and mainstream trend to ensure the sustainable development of university education, but it is not the absolute direction, the ultimate goal and the only means and method.

University Education&;The meaning of the market is: the university is; Senior Talent Products; The production unit, which has always had an inherent need to face the market. At the same time, universities are the consuming units of public goods such as higher education (families and students as consumers), and they have always been a market. Focusing on the market is its own development, which is the norm and standard of university education, and the internal needs and external needs determine that it should be market-oriented.

Being market-oriented is not the same; complete industrialization, free competition, and privatization; , because education itself is both an industry and a public utility.

The so-called market-oriented approach refers to the process and trend of reconstructing the management system, operation mechanism and control system and other teaching management systems of university education in accordance with the mechanism and laws of market operation under the conditions of market economy, adjusting and revising the relationship between universities and other social organizations, and gradually transforming universities into market operators.

Main attention. 1.It should be market-oriented, not must-have.

2.After graduating from university, it is inevitable to enter the market, and focusing on the market is conducive to employment.

3.It is conducive to the rational allocation of university resources.

4.Note that it is possible to associate the market with money, the market is not the same as money, money is part of the economy, the economy is part of the market, and the point cannot be generalized.

Question 1What do you think about the unpopular majors and popular majors in universities? Isn't it because the market needs it?

2.Rise to the moral height, grasp the market is not the mainstay, students can not be employed, can not realize value, the country's resources are wasted. Your parents have raised you for decades!

Bonus points! That's how I argued at the time in our school! Win! Bonus points! Bonus points! Bonus points! Bonus points! Bonus points!

The school is a base for educating and cultivating socialist talents. A market-oriented university education will inevitably lead to:

1.A considerable number of the children of workers and peasants and the children of disadvantaged groups are looking forward to school and sighing because of this, which is incompatible with the socialist principle of fairness.

2.The essence of market orientation is money orientation, that is, only recognize scattered money and do not recognize people, that is, if you have talent and no money, you will not come in. What is the difference between this and education in the old society?

3.The market-oriented educational orientation also runs counter to the socialist educational policy, and it is impossible to cultivate socialist newcomers who have the concept of eight honors and early digging gods and eight shames, but can only see the villains who forget their righteousness.

First, in order to consider whether university education should be market-oriented, it is necessary to first understand what "market-oriented" means. The so-called "market-oriented" refers to the process and trend of reconstructing the management system, operation mechanism and control system and other teaching management systems of university education in accordance with the mechanism and laws of market operation under the conditions of market economy, adjusting and revising the relationship between universities and other social organizations, and gradually transforming universities into market operators. Taking the market as the beacon and guiding its own development is the norm and standard of university education, and the internal needs and external needs determine that it should be market-oriented; Second, it is precisely because the market continues to demand "practical" talents, employers pay special attention to the ability to solve practical problems, they do not want to pay a high cost of adaptation to the hired college students, students' practical ability, innovation and entrepreneurship ability, interpersonal coordination ability, integration into the society, the ability to serve the society has become more and more important.

If university education still "emphasizes knowledge indoctrination and ignores ability training", it is obviously unable to meet the market demand, and the college students it trains are bound to have employment pressure. Third, we also have to consider the basic situation of higher education in China: at present, there are more than 3,400 institutions of higher learning, with a total number of students exceeding 20 million, and the gross enrollment rate of higher education has reached about 20%.

The 16th National Congress of the Communist Party of China (CPC) demanded that different types and levels of institutions of higher learning should have different positions. Research universities should serve the cultivation of a large number of top-notch innovative talents, but the main task of more small and medium-sized colleges and universities is to cultivate practical and applied talents at all levels, and students here must be "marketable" after graduation. For a variety of reasons, "university education should be market-oriented".