Which of the current Canon card players is the most worth buying, and the photo effect is good???

If you are looking for a portrait, it is recommended that you use a Kodak camera, and if you like to go out, it is recommended that you use a Fujifilm camera, and an S2600 eighteen-fold zoom with 12 million pixels **1800 or so.

G11, of course. But I suggest you take a look at Sony's TX7C, which is also good!

First, to buy a large factory, the quality is guaranteed. The camera brand, the first recommended is Leica, but ** is too high.

The public is a little bit more than Nikon, Canon, and Sony.

Secondly, there are Fuji, Panasonic, and Samsung.

Among them, some of Sony's cameras use vegetable heads, Panasonic uses Leica heads, and Samsung uses Schneider lenses, all of which are German lenses. Other people basically don't recommend it, it's all miscellaneous.

2.When buying, look at the size of the CCD, the bigger the better, the imaging ***, blur the background, and highlight the stronger the ability of the subject.

Looking at the wide angle, the equivalent focal length is above 28, and it is better to be able to reach 24. Photography lacks a wide angle, a lot of telephotos, and even more so for small numbers.

If you don't look at the telephoto, the telephoto is of little use.

The zoom ratio should not be too large, the image is not good if it is large, and 3-5 times is moderate. The change ratio of professional-grade lenses is not more than three times, and professionals often use prime focus.

Don't look at pixels. The pixels are useless, and now the pixels are enough.

3.If you want to be more professional, you should have a manual function.

4.If there is a RAW format, it is better, and there is a RAW function that can correct some shooting errors in post, such as white balance, **, etc.

It is recommended that, in terms of performance, it is a good first step to buy a high-end flagship product that has expired.

The card machines are almost the same, if you pursue picture quality, we recommend you GRD, DP1, DP2, GF1, G1, NEX5, G12, LX4

Personally, I think that Nikon and Olympus card players are the two brands with high cost performance on the market, and I personally use Nikon S620, this machine is very good, the effect is comparable to some big brands of SLR machines, and then Nikon's camera is very solid and durable!

When buying a camera, I generally trust the regular store, of course, maybe the corresponding ** will be higher than the Internet, but the quality can be guaranteed.

In view of the fact that there are parallel goods, assembled goods, or something, ......As you know, the level of copycats in our country is very strong, so .........

Hello! It is recommended to choose the Canon IXUS125HS.

The Canon IXUS 125HS is a sleek and beautiful camera with a compact and thin body, which is very portable, and comes with a variety of scene modes that require no cumbersome setup and fully automatic shooting capabilities.

Canon ixus125HS (1160 yuan) Compared with its predecessor Canon ixus115HS (950 yuan), the performance of the following items has been greatly improved:

1. The image sensor has been upgraded from 12.1 million pixels to 16.1 million pixels;

2. The image processor is upgraded from DIGIC4 processor to DIGIC5 processor, which has stronger noise reduction ability and faster processing speed;

3. The lens has been upgraded from "28-112mm, 4x optical zoom" to "24-120mm, 5x optical zoom", with a wider angle and longer telephoto.

The Canon IXUS 125HS performance surpasses the Canon IXUS 115HS across the board.

The 5x optical zoom of this camera is enough to cope with the needs of general home shooting, and the model with a long focal length will have a low focusing success rate if you do not use a tripod.

The Nikon P310 is available online.

The Sony H200 Canon SX500 telephoto camera is not much larger than the card player, but it is much more practical.

I don't know the specific concept of "good effect" of the PO master.

If it is a good contrast image in the card machine, it can only be the flagship model of the card machine.

Traditional ones such as Canon's G-series, such as the G15 G16Panasonic's LX series, such as the LX5 LX7, are all card machines with good imaging effects.

It is the bottom with 1.

Of course, there is the Sony black card recently, the RX100 RX100 II. Because the bottom of 1 inch is directly used, the image is leveraged.

Above, I exclude cameras that can change lenses, or telephoto cameras. Or a camera with a lens that is too prominent, such as the Sony RX1.

It should be Nikon's card machine that is the best.

Canon's cost-effective, Kodak's manual function is perfect for those who are accustomed to using mechanical cameras.

I recommend the one I used myself, the Panasonic FX33

The overall performance is not as good as Nikon's better card machine, but it is very small, and it is smaller than the ordinary small card machine.

If you ask for quality, then this one is original in Osaka, Japan, and there is no domestic OEM, so you can be satisfied. Other Panasonic models are not necessarily made in Japan.

Now there's nothing brand new, about 600 or more.

If you want to buy something more expensive, you can buy the upgraded version of the FX33, and be careful not to buy the simplified version.

Recommend Panasonic FP8, beautiful, practical and cheap, because Panasonic does not care about the cost to use this machine to earn reputation.

FP8 has a wide angle, a relatively large aperture, and a high-cost ED lens that is rare in its kind, coupled with Panasonic's industry-first quality guarantee, and now Panasonic's new FP series is a performance downgrade and upgrade, which shows FP8's ultra-high cost performance.

The only drawback of the FP8 is that there is no lens cap, but there is a high-strength UV lens, and even some netizens took the key to swipe through the lens, which is not damaged at all.

In fact, in Japan, Panasonic is the first in the field of home cameras in foreign countries, and then Fuji (the general quality of the workmanship is generally cost-effective, and the F series has long occupied the title of the king of card camera image quality) Sony (the quality of the workmanship is generally technological innovation, but it is valuable to buy 2,000 yuan with a back-illuminated sensor, and the hardware defects of the battery lock jitter door do not change, and the unlucky people should buy it carefully), Canon is just more advertising in China, and there are many people, and it is expensive, not worth buying.

FP8 supply is not much, FP1, FH1 can be used as an alternative, the licensed goods of the machine plus spare batteries, memory cards are about 1300 yuan.

The CoolPix S6000's 14.2-million-pixel sensor and optical 7x zoom Nikkor ED lens are built into an ultra-slim body. It is also equipped with a 28mm wide-angle function, and the minimum shooting distance of the macro shooting mode is 3cm, so you can shoot creative**.

The CoolPix S6000 achieves high-speed autofocus with ultra-fast start-up in about seconds, and lens shift dampening. 4 advanced image stabilization features to capture the best moments. High-quality flash control, which is also an indispensable part of the camera.

Overall, the Nikon S6000 is good.

Compared to the Nikon S8000, you can see about it, and I'll tell you about some other brands.

Canon's Ixus 210 is good, I've been watching it for a long time, the CCD with good functions is just a full touch screen, the playability is relatively high, it depends on whether you are used to it, if you don't like the full touch screen, the ixus130 is also good, and now it is Canon's main hit, and the cost performance is relatively high. Sony's TX5's 3-proof function is good, and the Exmor R back-illuminated CMOS manual shooting of night scenes is very good, but the battery life of Sony's battery is not complimentary. It depends on your preferences, I think these two machines are not bad, and I won't regret buying either one.

Hello! I bought a Nikon S570, 12 million pixels, cost-effective, I used it very well. It is recommended that you check it online to see if you like it? Happy shopping!

I recommend Canon, I bought the Ixus 870 earlier, it feels good, and now** it should be in the early 1k.

Canon Ignore Nikon's rest, choose Canon for more portraits, and choose Nikon for more landscapes.

Canon 1500 If you buy Samsung, Sony, you can only buy a gorgeous appearance. Be cautious.