In the current card machine, the advantages and disadvantages of Canon, Sony, Panasonic, Nikon and o

The Canon's camera design is more user-friendly, with a lot of shooting modes, and people and long shots are good, but macro and night shots are quite poor. Sony's except for the more fashionable style, the rest really dare not compliment. Panasonic, fine workmanship, powerful in some unilateral aspects, if you have any special requirements, you can consider.

Nikon's is similar to Canon's, but it may look old-fashioned, and the noise is a bit strong in the low-end device.

Personally, I recommend that if you are starting or using it at home, choose the Canon one, which has more comprehensive functions.

In fact, the product lines of various brands are quite rich, mainly depending on the demand to choose the machine.

But I have to say something for sure. The low-end machines are almost the same, and they have no characteristics.

To a high-end card or a professional photographer to spare the machine.

The Canon feels relatively simple to operate. It's a little more humane, and the picture quality is okay.

Nikon's P7700 can be compared to professional SLR in operation, and the image quality depends on the model, but the sensor is generally better than Canon.

Sony's cards are very good, and there are also expensive and outrageous full-frame cards, such as RX1, nearly 2W**, but the quality is almost the same as that of a professional SLR, the difference is the support of control and lens groups. In terms of sensors, it should be said that Sony is the best, and Nikon is second, but the gap is very small, it should be said that it is all Sony foundry.

There are also other brands of Fuji, such as x20 x100, the picture quality is great, ** it's not cheap, x20 is about 5k6 x100s 8k5。。。

If the landlord wants to choose a machine, he may wish to talk about his needs and budget.

Canon, delicate imaging, real color, average distortion, **high, good design;

Sony, the imaging quality is acceptable, Zeiss lenses are dignified, very versatile, and beautiful in appearance (although the T series is beautiful, it will have scratches on the slide cover after a long time, which is very ugly).

Samsung's color is elegant, the imaging is quite delicate, the Schneider lens has a cool and bright color, the analysis is good, and the design is medium to high.

Fuji color is more elegant, the control of people's skin color is better, the function is less, and the product design is not very good. But the EXR technology is a highlight.

Nikon's image quality is sharp, the colors are bright, the performance is good, and the design is rather dull. And the card machine is not done enough.

Panasonic's products are relatively stable, the image quality is acceptable, there is more noise, but it has been improving, the Leica lens is its weapon, the design is more conservative, but it is quite sturdy, unlike Nikon Fuji plastic feeling is heavier. High-end products don't.

Casio is good for money, but the response is relatively slow, the design is acceptable, the colors are plain, in short, it is relatively mediocre in all aspects, and there is no character;

Feeling in terms of image quality is: Canon Nikon is better than Samsung, Sony Fuji, Panasonic Casio.

Design: Sony, Canon, Panasonic, Casio, Samsung, Nikon, Fuji.

In fact, this comparison doesn't make much sense, mainly to understand the brand concept, and a large manufacturer has been upgrading, like Sony after using R-type CMOS, the sensitivity has skyrocketed, and the image quality is also delicate.

Feel the card machine.

Sony is more fun, the picture quality is OK, Canon is to ensure excellent imaging performance on the premise of improving the appearance and playability of the product, Nikon card machine does not have a single-lens reflex and professional portable to do it carefully, but the single-lens reflex is very good, Panasonic and Casio are more stable, but Panasonic is more sophisticated in product availability, of course, in order to meet the needs of the market, it has also launched some scum cameras, many professional photographers prefer to play with a Panasonic card or LX series, the professionalism of its concept can be seen, and the Casio market is relatively stable, which can be seen from its mediocre performance and design, as well as its pursuit of cost performance.

Samsung has always wanted to pursue development, and its ambitions are not inferior to Sony, so the imaging of the old products is good, and the new products have not been used, so I dare not talk nonsense.

If you want to buy a card or something, you can buy Sony if you want to play, buy Panasonic if you want to taste professional taste, buy Canon if you want to be relatively high, you can buy a camera, and you can buy Casio if you don't ask for it.

Other Dumu has the core technology of soy sauce and also check and compare on their respective official websites Sony's beauty, which can only be high. Nikon's cards are not so good.

In the case of a DSLR, I only know that Canon is more suitable for journalistic documentaries.

Nikon is suitable for landscapes.

Card digital cameras, because the imaging structure is very different from traditional cameras, so all manufacturers are on the same starting line at the technical level, and will not be stronger than traditional home appliance manufacturers such as Panasonic Sony because the manufacturer is Canon or Nikon! On the contrary, traditional consumer electronics manufacturers such as Panasonic have more advantages in the technical strength, industrial design and humanized functions of imaging components!

Since both Canon and Panasonic have a wide range of camera lineups, let's compare the most representative devices of the same positioning from each of the two manufacturers!

The Panasonic LX3 was launched with the industry's widest aperture and widest angle, and the image quality has reached unprecedented heights, and there is almost no match for color, sharpness, and other optical expressions! And Panasonic's cameras generally have bright colors and high picture sharpness! The function is practical and not fancy!

Superb workmanship! Canon's S95 (the reason why I didn't choose the Canon G series is because I personally feel that the G series can't be classified as a card machine and belongs to a brick machine).

It's also a machine that focuses on image quality, and the colors are relatively flat, but the overall image quality is not inferior to LX3, and there are not many practical functions!

Both machines are very portable! The disadvantage of LX3 is that the skin color of the characters is not well mastered, and it is difficult to shoot the real task skin tone, but it is a powerful tool for shooting landscapes! The S95 is more balanced in all aspects, and the mastery of the character's skin color is relatively better than that of the LX3!

The disadvantage is that the imaging is relatively meaty, and the colors are more realistic and less gorgeous!!

In terms of image quality, there is not much difference between brands of cameras of the same grade, and the difference lies in the imaging style!

Another important factor is the scale of after-sales service, which is far inferior to Panasonic Sony's after-sales service stations in all corners!

The imaging technology and imaging effect of the Canon camera are good, and the Panasonic is more average.

The card machine pays attention to portability, and there will be no big difference in the effect of the machine within 2000, Canon has the largest sales volume, good quality and low price, and is a popular brand!

The advantages of SLR are obvious, let me briefly introduce the disadvantages of SLR, and the value of the existence of card machines.

Regarding the advantages and disadvantages of SLR and card players, a company did a survey of consumer groups a few years ago, and the question at that time was "why don't you choose to buy SLR".The feedback received was mainly focused on the following items.

1.The SLR is too big.

2.The SLR is too heavy.

3.The lens is too expensive.

4.SLR is too professional to use.

That is, it simply becomes: big, heavy, expensive, difficult, these four words.

Compared with the card machine, the biggest disadvantage of the SLR is in these four aspects, so at this stage, although the image quality of the SLR is very good, the control is very strong, and the degree of freedom of shooting is very high, but it has never been able to replace the position of the card machine.

Later, the company adjusted its direction based on the results of the survey, and in 2010 launched a point-and-shoot, inexpensive**, compact body interchangeable lens camera, which was recognized by consumers around the world and achieved great success.

This company is Sony, and the cameras launched are NEX3 and NEX5, maybe you've heard of it, hehe. When the nex5 was first launched last year, there was a **constant** situation, and it was hard to find a machine, hehe.

Therefore, the cardization of SLRs, the SLR of cards is the future development direction.

The advantage of the SLR is that the pixel is high, and the interchangeable lens can be used for some special occasions, and the disadvantage is that the body is large and inconvenient to carry.

The advantages of the card are that the body is small and mobile, and it is suitable for general photography or capture, and the disadvantage is that the pixels are not high, and it is not competent for special scenes (such as some large scenes of the sports meeting).

If you don't want to engage in professional photography, it is enough to buy a card for general families, and SLR is a money-burner.

The SLR camera has an interchangeable lens, a large image sensor, good high sensitivity, and high imaging quality.

The card machine has no advantages other than portability.

SLR pixels are good, in addition, heavy **high, not easy to carry, non-professional is not recommended to use.

The card is more convenient, and there are many cards with high pixels, which can meet the needs of taking pictures, and it is also easy to carry and convenient. Original.