Why did the State of Chu dare to say wildly, Although Chu has three households, the death of Qin wi

Because the people of Chu hated Qin the most, and at that time, in order to gather people's hearts in order to facilitate the uprising, this sentence appeared.

Because the military strength and strategists of Chu State at that time were relatively strong, and the financial revenue was also the best!

Because this was prophesied by someone based on celestial phenomena, people in ancient times trusted this kind of thing very much, so the Chu State made this wild statement.

The State of Chu is the strongest country except for the State of Qin, so after the demise of the State of Chu dare to say this, the State of Chu has a large population and talents, and it must be the people of the State of Chu who will destroy the State of Qin in the future.

The so-called Warring States period was mainly seven countries, which were the most powerful of these seven countries? Three countries, one is the state of Qi, one is the state of Qin, and one is the state of Chu. There are two reasons for the strength of Qi, one is that Qi is the oldest feudal state with the most qualifications, which is the country of King Wu of Zhou in the early years of the Western Zhou Dynasty, and it is a famous superpower.

Qin and Chu were both rising stars, and these two rising stars later developed very quickly. The Chu people were known as Jing Barbarians at that time, that is, the Chu people had a kind of brute strength. I am a Chu person, you see that I also have brute strength.

It is that we in Hunan have a saying called tyranny, tyranny and barbarism. What is tyranny and brutality? Everyone says that this thing can't be done, I have to do it, this is the character of Hunan people, the spirit of Hunan people, this is a spirit of Chu people, so the most unconvincing thing about Chu people is Zhou.

Even now Hubei people still have a mantra, called disobedience to Zhou, that is, unconvinced, he is not convinced, called disobedience Zhou, disobedience to Zhou, Lao Tzu is not convincing Zhou. is not satisfied with this week, so he will continue to improve himself and desperately expand himself. At that time, the king of Chu had a family tradition that it was a great shame to not send troops for seven years, and he often waged wars, and finally became a strong country in the south.

In the eyes of the Chu people, it should be our Chu people who should unify China, not Qin Laoxi, and he is not convinced. Therefore, Chu ** passed on a sentence, although Chu has three households, the death of Qin will be Chu.

This sentence first appeared on the battlefield where the Qin State destroyed the Chu State, when the general of the Chu State saw that his country had no hope, and in anger he said such cruel words as "Although Chu has three households, the death of Qin will be Chu". In the eyes of everyone at that time, the sentence "Although Chu has three households, the death of Qin will be Chu" is a failed person who is unwilling to release a cruel sentence. Although it seems to me that it is indeed a harsh sentence, it does not make any sense at all.

But it is very coincidental that the descendants of Chu have such a ruthless person as Xiang Yu, which leads to the statement that "although Chu has three households, Qin must be Chu", it has become somewhat credible. But there is a logical relationship between this, which is that the latecomer makes the sentence "Although Chu has three households, the death of Qin must be Chu" believable, not because of this sentence, there are latecomers. I think this can only be said to be a coincidence, after all, it is a society that pays attention to science.

And one point worth thinking about is who put forward the sentence "Although Chu has three households, if Qin dies and Chu dies"? Because Liu Bang, like Xiang Yu, also belongs to the descendants of the Chu State, but Xiang Yu is a nobleman of the Chu State, and Liu Bang is a native of Chu. So this sentence may also be put forward by Liu Bang in order to beautify himself and dilute Xiang Yu's image.

The history books that appeared in the Han Dynasty will definitely deliberately beautify their image of the feudal rule of the Han Dynasty. I don't agree with this sentence anyway, after all, Xiang Yu and Liu Bang are just the main force in the anti-Qin, and the other is the one who reaps the fruits in the end. Those who oppose Qin are not only the people of Chu, but also the descendants of other countries.

To a certain extent, this sentence has diluted the role of other countries, and deliberately emphasized the role played by the people of Chu in this anti-Qin war. But there is no way, after all, the history books were not written by me, this sentence "Although Chu has three households, the death of Qin will be Chu" Just take it as a story to understand.

Because at that time, although the Qin Dynasty was very strong on the surface, the harsh taxation and tyranny had already made the people below miserable, and the people everywhere were not able to make a living, while the Chu State had few people, but there were no such problems, and when the Chu State was against Qin, it was a hundred responses.

Because the state of Chu is rich in resources and strong national strength, coupled with the fact that King Huai of Chu entered Qin, he could not return to the country after death, so the people of Chu hated the state of Qin very much, so there was this sentence.

Because Xiang Yu, the descendant of the King of Chu, is a hero, he will annihilate the Qin army in the future.