How to solve the problem that CNKI duplicate citations are marked in red?

Many students will use the CNKI detection system to test their own ** in advance, but they have various questions after the CNKI test report is released. My own ** obviously uses the correct citation format, why is it still marked red by the system, which directly leads to my own ** repetition rate is too high, such a problem will be encountered by many students, so how to solve this problem? Today I am going to tell you how to solve this problem.

So before solving this problem, we also need to understand what conditions are needed for the reference in the CNKI detection system to identify**.

1. The format of the citation needs to be correct, which is the basic and most important, in general, the citation format only needs to be quoted in quotation marks in this text, such as "HowNet Detection System".

2. **The content of the cited literature needs to be included in the database of the CNKI detection system to be recognized, if there is no content included in the CNKI database, then how can the citation be recognized?

3. **The quoted content cannot exceed the provisions of the CNKI detection system, otherwise it will be judged to be over-quoted. In the case of over-quoting, most of the content quoted in ** exceeds 5% of this text, and all citations will not be marked.

So how to solve this problem? In fact, it is very simple, in addition to the above places, when we quote **, we also need to understand the quoted content by ourselves, and then reorganize the language by ourselves. Don't have a fluke mentality, feel that your ** citation will not be counted in the total repetition, not afraid of 10,000 just in case, and wait for the CNKI test results to regret it too late, all students should take their graduation seriously.

If the reference format is correct, it will be recognized and filtered by CNKI's ** plagiarism checking system. It is in gray font and does not participate in the ** duplicate check. If you encounter the situation that the references in the CNKI duplicate check are marked in red, then there are no more than two reasons:

1. Fake CNKI ** was used to check duplicates

If a fake CNKI duplicate check is used, it is naturally impossible to effectively identify the references. It is not surprising that the references of CNKI are marked in red. Here we are going to learn how to verify authenticity.

For details, you can see the article "" shared before the HowNet Check Duplicate Treasure Book.

2. The format of the references is incorrect

The format of the references for graduation is incorrect, resulting in CNKI being unable to screen the references and treat them as article annotations. In general, there is no problem with the school's reference formatting.

1.There is a clear "References" mark, and the 4 words of the reference occupy an exclusive line, and the following are the individual reference entries;

3.The label can be automatically generated by word or written by hand;

4.Do not add punctuation marks inside the designator, e.g. [num.].] or (num), etc.;

5.It is best to have time to rest in each bibliography or to have a URL or bibliographic information;

6.There should be no manual line breaks or carriage returns within a reference and at the end of the reference.

First of all, whether the citation is plagiarism or not has nothing to do with the source of the marking, and whether the citation can be detected has nothing to do with whether the system is accurate or not. All of this is determined by the thresholds of the system.

CNKI has set a threshold for the sensitivity of the detection system, which is 3%, calculated by the number of words in a paragraph (or chapter), and plagiarism or citation of less than 3% of a single document cannot be detected, which is common in small sentences or small concepts in large paragraphs of text. For example, if paragraph 1 (Chapter 1) is 10,000 words, then citations within 300 words (10,000 times 3% = 300) of document A will not be detected.

If the citation of B document exceeds 300 words, then the plagiarism of B literature distributed in the first chapter will be marked in red, no matter where it is located in the first chapter, even if it is interrupted into a sentence, as long as it exceeds 20 words. [1] In fact, I also tell students here that a way to revise is not to choose an article to cite for plagiarism in paragraphs, but to select as many documents as possible, and to take a few sentences from one article, so that it will not be detected. [2]

Regarding some students asking why the cited is also plagiarism, here is mainly because of the threshold problem of CNKI, higher than 3% is uniformly counted as plagiarism, that is to say, the critical point of citation for plagiarism is between 3%. Once you exceed the limit, even if you mark the citation, it won't help.

1] The 300 words referred to here is an approximate value, not a critical value. The lower the number of citations, the less likely it is to be detected.

2] The updated CNKI academic misconduct detection system has adjusted this threshold to 3%, which is 5% previously, which means that the detection system has stricter requirements for citation, but it is not difficult to use the methods we mentioned later.

If your references are formatted correctly, the system will automatically identify and eliminate those that do not participate in the body plagiarism. References are marked in red to indicate that you have made a mistake in formatting. The system uses your references as the body of the text to check for plagiarism. I hope I can help you, and feel free to ask me if you have any questions.

It should be that the format is incorrect, and the algorithm of CNKI will judge whether it is a reference according to the format, and the format of the reference literature should not be generated by a tool as much as possible.

**The reasons cited for being also marked in red need to be investigated as follows:

1.There is a clear "References" mark, and the 4 words of the reference occupy an exclusive line, and the following are the individual reference entries;

3.The marking can be automatically generated by word, and the manuscript can be written by hand; Do not add punctuation marks inside the designator, e.g. [num.].] or (num), etc.;

4.It is desirable to have time information or URL or bibliographic information in each bibliography;

5.Do not have a manual line break or carriage return in a reference and at the end of this reference (i.e., go with the flow, it will automatically wrap after the full line, please do not make it artificial!). ）

It is normal to cite literature in the process of writing, and it is necessary to read a lot of literature before writing to understand the development of disciplines in the industry, which itself is also a process of accumulation and learning of common sense, so as long as the author uses the correct citation format when writing, and the part cited is not very large, it will not have an impact.

CNKI** duplicate check will automatically identify the reference part and mark it in green font. However, it must be noted that large quotations must not be made during the citation process, because they will also be detected as plagiarism. After the user enters CNKI, enter the reference he wants to cite in the search bar on the home page, and then click the citation button below the operation to directly cite the format of the corresponding reference, or click **Export to the user's computer.

First of all, we need to understand the academic plagiarism.

How the system works. These plagiarism checking systems use text comparison technology, that is, existing text is compared with existing text to check whether there is similar content. Some plagiarism checking systems will also automatically extract keywords or phrases from the literature for comparison.

In this process, the citations are also compared. Under normal circumstances, the plagiarism checking system will not change the cited literature as plagiarism or plagiarism, because it has been explained, but in the process of comparison, the system will compare it with the existing literature, and the similarity will also be compared. Therefore, marking the cited lines in red helps readers quickly identify which content is a citation of existing research results, thereby reducing the occurrence of plagiarism.

Second, the red signal has the effect of warning the reader of the importance of these parts and the need to use them with caution. Finally, red can also be used as a way to mark, making it easier for inspectors to find and remove duplicate content in **, ensuring the high level of scientific research and academic integrity.

To avoid this, some academic plagiarism checking systems have adopted standardized citation formats. These formats highlight the annotation of the cited document from the body of the text, avoiding the need to compare it with other text. However, different systems use different citation formats, which may result in unrecognizable annotations, and therefore cited documents may also be compared.

In general, the red mark does not mean that there is a plagiarism problem, but it only indicates that the cited literature has been compared in the detection system. For writers, it is only necessary to use a standardized citation format and ensure that the cited documents are authentic and reliable.

Cited articles are highlighted in red for the following reasons:

1. In the process of writing, I quoted a lot of others. It's common to write ** quoting other people's sentences, but don't quote too much. And you should add a comment after the quote so that the plagiarism checking system will know the part of the reference when it performs a duplicate check.

2. If there is 60% similarity between the ** you wrote and the ** you published** in terms of layout, content and structure, it is called plagiarism. If there is 70% similarity in content with the published **, it will also be called plagiarism.

3. Sometimes, students know to annotate when citing literature, but errors are added to the formatting field or there are errors in the written references. When it is checked by the plagiarism detection system, it will also be marked in red.

For the first duplicate checking system, only the HowNet duplicate checking system can identify the references well, and the recognition of other detection systems is not as high as HowNet, so it is impossible to remove the detection of references. If there is a format in the reference list that cannot be recognized by CNKI, then CNKI may not be able to identify it in the later reference list.

If there are too many citations, they will often be detected as plagiarism in the plagiarism check, so that the repetition rate will become higher. In fact, only the part cited by ** is reasonable and basically will not be checked for plagiarism, so the correct format and annotation is the way to avoid being marked in red. Second, pay attention to reasonable quotations, and don't use irrelevant citations to make up the word count.

In short, in the quotation part of the graduation **, do a good job of marking and paying attention, and there will be no problem with reasonable citation.

Not necessarily, CNKI is very strict about the criteria for judging valid citations, so it is very likely to be counted as a duplicate even if you are superscripted. It is best to express it in your own words after you understand it, and it doesn't matter if you are less professional, which can effectively reduce the duplicate check rate.

Of course, there are some technical terms that cannot be replaced, and it is also possible to retain, which is why a certain repetition rate is allowed. Therefore, in the literature review part, you can't copy the standard citation and it's over, you have to change it to your own words.

No. <>

If there is a cited part in **, and the citation format and cited literature are marked, then after CNKI checks the duplicate of **, the citation information will be displayed in green font in the duplicate check report.

In addition, the repetition rate, citation rate, duplicate content, total number of words and other duplicate check indicators will also be marked in the ** duplicate check report, and students can view the duplicate check report and modify the ** weight reduction.

First of all, the red part must be changed, because this is the proportion of the cavity sign calculated into your duplicate check, which can be replaced with some agreed synonyms, or the division of long and short sentence patterns, and the word order is reversed without guessing the meaning of the overall sentence.

Because you mark the green part, it means that you cite other people's literature or **, these green parts are allowed to appear in the graduation**. Say it as much as you can with your own understanding, that is, you can quote it, but it should not be too high in the whole text.

Generally, the repetition rate of undergraduate ** is 20%, and the specific requirements shall prevail according to the requirements of the school. If the school requires a repetition rate of 20% and a student of 19%, then it is best to continue to change the red marking. Because the update time of the CNKI database is very fast, and the data will change after a period of time, it is recommended that the duplicate check rate should not be too close to the requirements of the school.