Does a verbal agreement have legal effect

Updated on society 2024-03-02
8 answers
  1. Anonymous users2024-02-06

    The verbal agreement is valid.

    Civil law provides that there are two forms of contract: the first is oral, and the second is written. An agreement or contract concluded orally is valid as long as it is expressed in the true interest of both parties.

    Exception: When the law clearly stipulates that the form of the contract is a formal contract, that is, a written contract must be signed, if the parties only make oral expressions and do not sign a formal written contract, it is deemed that no agreement has been reached. _

  2. Anonymous users2024-02-05

    Yes, but there are more conditions, you have to be able to prove that the other party said it, and the other party admitted, or there is a third proof, if you just say what the other party said, it is very difficult for you to use this to fight a lawsuit, and if you can't produce other proof, the judge will not accept it. Article 10 of the Contract Law stipulates that the parties may conclude a contract in written, oral and other forms. However, as long as the oral contract is a true expression of the intention of both parties, the other party agrees, or there is evidence to prove that the oral agreement was established through negotiation between the two parties, it is also valid.

    Except for the written agreement required by national laws, such as construction contracts, technology development contracts, housing sales contracts, etc., if such contracts take the form of oral agreements, they can be regarded as invalid and are not protected by law.

  3. Anonymous users2024-02-04

    If both parties admit the oral agreement, it is valid. If one party does not admit it, the other party will be invalid if there is no evidence to prove it.

  4. Anonymous users2024-02-03

    Some. It's just that it is often difficult to adduce evidence, and the possibility of being arrested is low.

  5. Anonymous users2024-02-02

    Does a verbal agreement have legal effect?

  6. Anonymous users2024-02-01

    Legal analysis: An oral agreement has legal effect, provided that the oral agreement is a true and legitimate expression of intent of the parties. According to Article 469 of the Civil Code, which came into effect in 2021, the parties may enter into a contract in written, oral or other forms.

    The written form is a form in which the contents of the contract, letter, telegram, telex, fax, etc. can be tangibly expressed. Data messages that can be tangibly represented in electronic data interchange, e-mail, etc., and that can be accessed at any time shall be deemed to be in writing.

    Legal basis: Article 469 of the Civil Code of the People's Republic of China stipulates that the parties may conclude a contract in written, oral or other forms.

    The written form is a form in which the contents of the contract, letter, telegram, telex, fax, etc. can be tangibly expressed. Data messages that can be tangibly represented in electronic data interchange, e-mail, etc., and that can be accessed at any time shall be deemed to be in writing.

  7. Anonymous users2024-01-31

    Oral agreements are legally binding. According to the relevant laws and regulations, the oral agreement is also an expression of the actor's intention, which is the free expression of the parties' intentions, and as long as the parties reach a consensus through consultation, an oral agreement can be adopted. However, oral agreements are difficult to obtain evidence and do not have strong protection for contracts, so the parties should carefully consider using oral agreements.

    The content of the oral agreement shall not violate the mandatory provisions of laws and administrative regulations

    1. One party does not conclude the contract by means of fraud or coercion, which damages the interests of the state;

    2. The two parties are not maliciously colluding to damage the interests of the state, the collective or a third party;

    3. The two parties are not covering up the illegal purpose in a legal form;

    4. There is no harm to the public interest;

    5. The subject of the contract has the capacity for civil conduct and civil rights;

    6. If the intention is true, the contract is established and has legal effect and is protected by law.

    Article 469 of the Civil Code of the People's Republic of China.

    The parties may conclude a contract in written, oral or other forms.

    The written form is the form of contract, letter, telegram, telex, fax, etc., which can tangibly express the content of the erected beam.

    Data messages that can be tangibly expressed in electronic data interchange, e-mail, etc., and that can be accessed at any time for reference, are considered to be in writing.

  8. Anonymous users2024-01-30

    Oral contracts also have legal effect. As long as the contract is a true expression of the intention of a person with capacity to act, does not violate the mandatory provisions of laws and administrative regulations, and does not violate public order and good customs, the contract is valid no matter what form it takes.

    An oral agreement is a kind of agreement, but it has its very obvious limitations, it refers to an agreement that is not in written form, and it is generally considered to be an agreement reached orally, and this kind of agreement generally has legal effect. An oral agreement corresponds to a contract in written form. The law stipulates that some types of contracts must be signed in writing, otherwise they must be certified or confessed by a third party.

    oral agreements, as long as their content does not violate the mandatory provisions of laws and administrative regulations; One party has not entered into a contract by means of fraud or coercion, which harms the interests of the state; The two parties are not maliciously colluding to harm the interests of the state, the collective or a third party; The parties are not concealing illegal purposes in a lawful form; There is no harm to the public interest; The subject of the contract has the capacity for civil conduct and civil rights; If the intention is true, the contract is established and has legal effect and is protected by law.

    According to the Civil Procedure Law, the types of evidence, witness testimony, and audio and video recordings of the contract can all be used as evidence, and the plaintiff should first prove that it has completed the content agreed in the contract. In the event of a dispute arising from an oral agreement, the key is to collect evidence from the injured party in the negotiation and settlement stage.

    If a large amount of loan contract is agreed orally between relatives and friends, if the agreement is only made orally due to the situation, and there is no third party present, it is best to properly keep the various bills provided by the bank and try to avoid using cash payment.

Related questions
11 answers2024-03-02

Hello, unfortunately you have encountered such trouble, but it has happened, I hope you can treat it calmly and deal with it bravely. By asking this question today, you are demonstrating your determination. As far as I understand the situation briefly, I hope it can help you! >>>More

7 answers2024-03-02

The general agreement must be filled in with the real names of both parties, (preferably with ID number) relevant contact information, the content of the agreement, the date and signatures and in duplicate, which is a formal agreement.

6 answers2024-03-02

First, whether receipts and receipts have legal effect depends on two factors: first, they are legal in content, which means that the receipts and receipts record real income and expenditure or loans; Second, it is formally legal, which means that the process of filling in receipts and receipts is voluntary, and there is no fraud, coercion, etc. Second, receipts generally refer to the financial accounting documents that have been printed, if the questions you mention belong to this category, according to the format of the receipt and the requirements of the project, fill in the comprehensive and truth-seeking without leaving blanks; Third, the receipt generally refers to the supporting materials written on blank paper, which requires the names of both parties, the amount of money or goods received or loaned, the reason for the receipt, expenditure or loan, whether there is interest or storage charges, the date of occurrence, and other relevant contents are recorded on the receipt, and signed and fingerprinted by both parties. >>>More

8 answers2024-03-02

The minutes of the meeting do not have the force of law. The minutes of the meeting are processed and sorted out according to the minutes and documents of the meeting and other relevant materials, and reflect the basic situation and spirit of the meeting. >>>More

14 answers2024-03-02

Taking our platform as an example, after the signatory performs real-name authentication, it needs to apply to a third-party CA agency for the issuance of a CA certificate, and after hashing the original content, it uses the private key to digitally sign, supplemented by a third-party trusted timestamp, to form a reliable electronic contract. >>>More