Personnel are not well managed, what are the good measures?

Disadvantages of relying only on personnel management: 1. Occasional error factors will increase. 2. The possibility of corruption and laziness increases. 3. Work efficiency may be reduced due to the low quality of management personnel. Hope it helps.

The stipulations of the enterprise system have aroused some dissatisfaction.

Motivate employees to work in the work.

There is also a balance to be balanced in mediating the conflicts in the work of employees.

As a manager of Danque, I found that I was missing a little"Communicate back and forth"feel, in a conversation, I may consider the opinions of others more from my own perspective, and I am more likely to do it according to my own ideas, and go less"Strive for space and prudence"。

Another point is that it lacks a little bit of the feeling of chatting with other people. I don't like to brag too much, and I won't retreat.

The third point is that the lack of mold loss is less early and the feeling of getting closer to the superior, which is not a sycophant. Rather, it is composed with superiors"own people"feelings.

The reason why the above three points are lacking is that there is a lack of strength and lack of self-confidence; The two are mutually restrictive.

However, it is possible to learn to improve.

I've been in the workshop, but not hardware. As a manager, it is necessary to solve some problems and difficulties, do you have no inspectors in your factory? If the goods are inspected by the inspector before leaving the warehouse, the return is also your lax control and dereliction of duty.

As a result, you will lose some customers. Don't always talk to them with a leader in front of the staff, just narrate in the tone of a friend, they should be happy to accept it, but if the mistake is not in these, it is the quality of the employees you invited, you have to think about it.

For the above questions; My opinion is that the staff is not very good, and these are not what you as a manager complain about. I've been a manager for more than a decade, and I think the problem lies with the managers themselves. First, when recruiting new employees, does the company train them; Second, before production, whether the management personnel have explained and guided the product process; Third, in the production process, whether the management personnel have tracked their products (semi-finished product inspection); Fourth, whether the company has carried out finished product inspection, and if so, since the goods have been put into storage to delivery.

The problem is also the quality inspection problem, whether the company has pursued the inspection responsibility.

As a qualified manager, you must know how to empathize, but also humanized management, usually communicate more with employees, do more ideological work for workers, and make workers feel that it is easier to get along with you, not that employees are very good now.

There will be problems in terms of production, but you have to nip them in the bud. If there are no problems in a factory, it means that your management will not find the problem, and then your management team should need to think about it. If all these processes are perfect, I believe that your quality will be taken to the next level.

Designated process flow - operators produce according to process requirements - inspectors inspect according to inspection standards.

If there is a problem in any link, we will hold anyone responsible.

Products that fail to pass the inspection cannot leave the factory. Management must be standardized in order to develop.