Debate Tournament Students should not be brave in their actions? Arguments of the opposing side

Writing ideas: first state your own point of view, and then debate according to your own point of view, that is, verify that what you say is correct.

Text: Our point of view is that ambition is not necessarily lofty, and down-to-earth is greater than ambition. I would like to state my views from the following points:

Aiming high and being down-to-earth do not conflict, aiming high does not mean being ambitious, and being ambitious and down-to-earth are opposites. Another important issue in the growth of talents is to aim high, but not to be ambitious. It is very valuable for a person to have great ambitions and ideals.

But lofty ideals and ambitions must be kept on the ground.

We all know that all big things are made up of small things, and details determine success or failure, so "down-to-earth" requires us to do every little thing well.

As Xu Xiake said before his death: "Zhang Qian in the Han Dynasty, Xuanzang in the Tang Dynasty, and Yelu Chucai in the Yuan Dynasty, they have all traveled the world." However, they all accepted the emperor's orders and were ordered to go to the four directions. ”

I was just a commoner, and I was not ordered, but I was dressed in cloth, with a cane, and straw sandals, and traveled all over the world on my own. Walking without a goal is often blind, and having a lofty goal can lead the way.

Down-to-earth and not enterprising, often sailing against the current and retreating if you don't advance. Aiming high is not to be ambitious, but to do what you can and constantly improve your three views. Establishing the right ideals and goals will help students in their career planning and contribute to society.

Down-to-earth can have a sense of achievement, down-to-earth without lofty ambitions, accumulated a certain strength can also achieve lofty goals, only lofty goals, not down-to-earth will not succeed. Down-to-earth, but you can achieve high results without lofty goals.

1.As long as it is the ideal in the heart, it is the ambition.

2.The ideal is not necessarily lofty, it is okay to have it.

3.A stable life is not necessarily lower than struggle, but it is better to be down-to-earth.

1.In the global economic environment, only by expanding domestic demand and promoting consumption can we contribute to the recovery of the national economy. It is anachronistic to advocate thrift at this time.

3.I don't think it's appropriate to save money, and I don't think we advocate profligacy. Moderately raising the standard of living under the conditions of ability is what we advocate moderate consumption.

When writing the judgment criteria, be sure to add a time qualifier, that is, whether or not to promote economy is considered in the current economic situation, which is beneficial to you.

The homework in primary school is not intense, but the 6 years of junior high school and high school are very important, the so-called laying a good foundation to build a building, so the six years of primary school should study hard, there is a lot of extracurricular time every day, if we use those time to study, then the progress of the year is not a star and a half.

The first priority of students is to learn, and doing homework is not only the most important way for primary school students to learn, but also the responsibility and obligation of students.

Doing homework on weekends affects sleep and makes students more nervous, but in fact, now primary school students have begun to decompress, and only need one day to complete their homework, and the rest of the time can be arranged freely to cultivate the independence of primary school students.

After all, we are still elementary school students, and we can't do too much homework in school, unless we are distracted by playthings or other things, there is no reason why we can't complete our homework for two days.

Many children participate in extracurricular activities involuntarily, and there is no joy but pressure under the pressure of their parents.

Children are too young to see as far as they can understand their parents, but sacrificing the joy of childhood with future life skills is something we don't want, which will exacerbate our rebellious psychology and be detrimental to our growth.

It's easier to get distracted by thinking about going out to play while doing homework.

The road of life is very long, for example, the tourism that Zhengfang said is better than seeing it, does it have to be realized in elementary school? We can slowly understand on the road of future growth, and it is the first thing to do a good job in learning.

Only by studying hard can we be a pillar of the country.

Moderator: In recent years, with the occurrence of the Xiao Yueyue incident, there has been a heated discussion in the society: does our society need to act bravely?

I think that many people held a positive opinion at the beginning, but then the incident of college students who lost their lives after failing to save the drowning person made many people hesitate and even oppose. But does society need to act bravely? Let's take a look at our debate with .

Positive: As for whether society needs to act bravely, our view is positive. Obviously, imagine that if the "most beautiful mother" did not reach out to pick up the falling child, if the "lifting brother" did not hold up the child in danger, then what the world lost was not two praise words, but two fresh and lovely lives.

There are unforeseen circumstances in the sky, and people have times when they are powerless, and if no one is brave enough to act bravely, tragedy is destined to occur. It can be seen that society needs to act bravely.

Opposed: On this topic, we believe that society does not need to act bravely. Because acting bravely can sometimes cause greater losses.

We can imagine how many college students fought with gangsters or went into the water to save people because of their righteousness and bravery, but in the end, they paid for their young lives that should have done more. Therefore, righteousness and courage are not needed by society.

I don't know what kind of opening you need, so I just wrote it. If you think it's good, take it. ）

Wisdom and courage are the same thing, and this debate is basically wrestling over propositions.

You say you want courage, what is courage for?

It takes courage to face choices and suffering, so if the ignorant are fearless, is that courage?

The question is, if you don't even have the wisdom to distinguish between suffering and choice, where does courage come from?

You start talking about courage when you can tell what you want, right?

However, living in this life is a matter of speaking with courage, how many people have fought in ancient times?

The problem is that you come into this world to be a mortal situation that no one can turn back to.

Everybody's going to die, damn it, how much courage it takes to live like this.

Admittedly, great wisdom cannot solve this deadlock.

So only courage is left to wrestle with life.

In the contemporary world, in a world of many desires, of course we need courage, but is the courage of not thinking about it still courage?

So courage and wisdom are the same thing. There is a winner or a loser in a debate, and the winner or loser depends on how to define this courage and wisdom.

If it were, I would only attack and not defend, and the other party would not be able to stand no matter what they said.

Because as long as one is wrong anyway.