What do you think of bad people doing good?

There was a man who always did good deeds, but one day he was sick and he didn't do good deeds, and the villagers said that he was a bad person, and there was a man who often did bad deeds and one day he didn't do it, and the villagers said that he was a good person. So bad people don't necessarily only do bad things, and good people don't necessarily only do good things.

There is no special definition or distinction between the so-called good guys and bad guys. Good people do bad things, and bad people do good things. And the bad guy mentioned above is to make you a person who is decisive in his heart and will do whatever it takes to get the end.

I don't think he's born a bad person, it's just that he chose the wrong person, and we can't judge him as a bad person because of this, he does good things because he knows that he is wrong and wants to change his ways, I think he should be given a chance.

As long as you do good deeds, no matter who you are, you are worthy of our respect.

Bad people aren't born to be bad either. And that's not to say that bad people don't do good. There's no such thing as good or bad.

Because at the beginning of man, nature is good. Because from childhood to adulthood, our original family has taught us to be good people and do good deeds! This is the moral bottom line that we have established since childhood. This is also a virtue inherited from the Chinese tradition.

I originally read an article, and I also saw this sentence, he said that a person has a hundred more good things, and if he does a bad thing, others will say that he is not good, and if a person has done a hundred bad things, and suddenly he has done a good thing, people will say that he is good, and there is no distinction between good and bad people when doing good, all for the purpose of being good for others.

Always be a bad person, be a good person once in a while, you are a good person, always be a good person, be a bad person once in a while, you are a bad person.

Do those who do good deeds necessarily be good people? Not necessarily, right? On the other hand, do bad people have to do only bad things and not do good things? There are two sides to everything.

Some good people will also do bad things, some bad people will also do good things, there are no absolute good people and bad people, and some bad people are actually not bad!

I'd rather be a bad guy who can do good things as he wants than a good guy who can't do a little bad. The cost of a good person is too high, and once you stand on the altar, you must fall to your death.

To do good deeds is to have a good image in front of the public, like a whitewashed hooligan. Because bad people have stronger hearts and are less likely to get hurt than good people. The good thing you do is also to let everyone know that it is not for you to be Lei Feng and do good deeds without leaving a name.

If you do something bad, you know it, but you don't expose it to others. will often do good deeds, so that the people around him think that he is a good person.

Often, "doing bad things" can also subtly change a person's heart, making them all have the following characteristics.

1) Suspicious and suspicious, malicious speculation.

What kind of person you are, you will naturally think what kind of person others are.

A person who thinks about how to "harm others" and "engage in sabotage" all day long will naturally think that others are like this, thinking that others are "bad" and will come to "harm him".

Therefore, they have never been afraid to speculate on others with the worst malice, and they have never dared to trust others.

After a long time in this situation, the whole person will become suspicious. And being in a state of mental stress for a long time can also make them nervous.

If you doubt without limit, you will inevitably become the creator of doubt.

2) People are gloomy and have a lot of negative energy.

When you stare into the abyss from afar, the abyss also stares at you.

People who like to do evil will inevitably come into contact with all kinds of negative energy things, and be infected by these things, and their psychological state will also change unconsciously.

Pig teammates? Is it more appropriate to call it this way?

In Mr. Ying Jianzhong's "** Wealth Fission", he talked about the good people and bad things and the bad people and bad things in **, and also talked about the good people and bad things. I thought it was fun, a little tongue-twisting, a bit of a brain twist.

Think about life is not just **, it is like this in many places. Good people and good deeds, the education we received from childhood, whether in school or the traditional education of our parents, requires us to do more good deeds. It is relatively simple to think that being a good person and doing good deeds is the basic requirement of our human society, and there is nothing to dispute.

But now there is a lot of controversy in society about good people and good deeds. First of all, there is the motivation to do good deeds. It is generally believed that everything is motivated, that is, to be good and good, it is also motivated.

When it comes to motivation, simple things get complicated. Second, doing good deeds also requires taking risks. For example, we are familiar with how to help the elderly who fall on the side of the road, and ask yourself to consider whether you have the ability to take risks, such as the elderly fall and the aftermath, there is an uncertain risk.

Bad people and bad things, everyone understands them at a glance, and there is no need to explain them in detail, and the bad guys in the concept must be doing bad things. In fact, it is also common for good people to do bad things and bad people to do good things. Not all good people do good deeds.

When a good person does not have the ability to distinguish between right and wrong, or in the face of right and wrong, he will blindly help and will not refuse others. Often the result is that good people do bad things, and if they mistake others, they will also mistake themselves. Bad people do good deeds, and they can only say that things happen unexpectedly.

In fact, the bad guys and the good guys are also relative. It is only in the presence of certain things that one can decide what is bad and what is good. Sometimes, good and bad are also interchangeable. Under normal circumstances, people choose the right way to do the right thing, and that's what good people do.

We always think that good people will do good deeds in their lives. How can good people do bad things? It stands to reason that this seems to be true, but in reality, good people do bad things, even if they may be unintentional. What's even more sad is that many good people are unaware of it after doing bad things with good intentions.

There is such a plot in Tolstoy's War and Peace:

Soon after joining the Freemasonry, Pierre reformed his estate with the beautiful ideal of helping the common people and benefiting others.

Pierre demanded that the stewards take immediate measures to free the peasants from the dependent status of serfs altogether, and not to increase the servitude of the peasants until then, and not to send women and children to the service; Punishment of peasants should be carried out by a persuasive approach, and corporal punishment should not be used; Each estate should have a hospital, an orphanage, a nursing home, and a school.

Pierre later made his own tour of his estate, and he saw that his estate was becoming more beautiful than the other. He felt that the peasants everywhere lived a peaceful and happy life, and he was grateful for the good things he had done for them. Welcoming parties were held everywhere, which made Pierre feel a little embarrassed, but deep down he was happy.

Pierre was very satisfied with the results of the inspection, he felt very happy, he felt that he had done so many good things for the farmers without much effort, and he felt that he could do more for these kind ordinary people.

If we don't look at Tolstoy's further analysis, we might also think that Pierre, with his generosity and kindness, did a lot of good things to save the peasants on his estate, but what is the actual situation? Let's look at Tolstoy's narrative:

We can be sure that Pierre was a good man, he wanted to make the peasants happy, he was generous, he helped the poor, and he wanted to do all kinds of good deeds. But what are the results? Thanks to Pierre's good deeds, the burden on the peasants is heavier than before.

Pierre was completely unaware of this, and he was still intoxicated by the happiness of being a good man.

I remember reading a sentence before that said that the biggest bad things in the world are often done by good people, and bad people can only do small bad things, and it seems that this is really the case! Being a good person is a technical job, and it is not enough to be simply kind, but also to have enough wisdom and insight.

Knowing this, I no longer dare to call myself a good person. Just think about doing things in the future, think more about it, think about it thoroughly, and don't act hastily, so as not to do bad things with good intentions.

As for being a good person, it's an ideal pursuit! Although I can't get there, my heart yearns for it!