Do you support this provision by not providing opportunities for bad artists to appear on camera and

I support this provision, and in particular, I disapprove of giving drug users the opportunity to speak out. I don't know how many anti-narcotics policemen sacrifice every year, and they use their lives to protect the "clean" of society, but these stars take drugs for various reasons, ruining the efforts and contributions made by the anti-narcotics police, and resolutely boycott drug-taking artists.

I support this provision very much because bad artists will have some bad effects on young people, and it will also be conducive to the harmonious development of society, so these bad artists should be boycotted.

I support. Because bad artists can set up a warning for the industry, they can help purify the industry environment and improve the quality of stars.

I am very supportive of this regulation, which can indeed eliminate some bad social images and promote social peace.

First; Support for such a provision.

Second; Nowadays, people are very concerned about everything about artists, especially young people who study them as their idols. It is not only to guide many artists to develop in the direction of positive energy, but also to guide the social masses.

I don't support this kind of regulation, and bad artists should be given a chance to speak out, which is too inhumane.

does not provide opportunities for bad artists to appear on camera and speak out, you and I support this provision, which can purify the live broadcast environment and crack down on these bad artists.

does not provide opportunities for bad artists to appear in public, the standard of bad artists has brought a very bad impact on the society, and they have done some illegal things, such as Fan Bingbing tax evasion, Wu Xiubo is also suspected of tax evasion and other celebrities.

does not provide opportunities for bad artists to appear in public to speak out, and the standard of bad artists is to do some illegal things, and it has a serious impact on society, and it is also not conducive to the harmonious development of society.

The standard of a bad artist is that he has done something harmful to society. Or there is a big problem in personal morality, I don't think such an artist deserves to appear on the screen.

Illegal. Bad artists include violating laws and regulations and making a bad impact on the public, such as drug use.

There is no clear standard for bad artists for the time being, one person advocates that as long as there are artists with moral flaws, they are all bad artists, and the other part advocates that as long as public morality is not damaged, artists with a little flaw in private morality are also acceptable.

Radio and television said that it does not provide opportunities for bad artists to appear in public to speak out, and bad deeds refer to doing things that violate laws and regulations, which are particularly inappropriate in life, and have a very bad impact on society.

Judging from the behavior of artists in recent years, bad deeds mainly refer to artists who take drugs, insult national character in words or behavior, or artists who have brought a great adverse impact on society.

Radio and television said that they would not provide opportunities for bad artists to appear in public, bad deeds refer to drug abuse, extramarital affairs, etc., these bad artists have caused a bad impact on society, so they are not allowed to appear on the camera.

Radio and television said that it does not provide opportunities for bad artists to appear in public, and I personally think that bad deeds refer to the irregularities of some artists' self-behavior, and they will bring negative effects to some fans, so this provision will be made.

Radio and television said that it does not provide opportunities for bad artists to appear in public to speak out, and bad deeds are to do a lot of illegal and criminal things, and they have caused a lot of bad effects on society, and it is easy to cause a certain misleading effect on young people.

Radio and television really do not provide opportunities for bad artists to appear in public to speak out, and bad deeds mainly refer to some bad practices in our social life, as well as some evil behaviors we commit.

Inferior refers to entertainers who have negative press. Especially stars like Fan Bingbing, Ke Zhendong, and Chen Yufan, who have negative news.

According to relevant incidents, the State Administration of Radio, Film and Television recently issued a notice on the management of live broadcasts, and it was clearly stipulated in the notice that illegal and unethical artists are not allowed to appear in public. As soon as this regulation came out, it caused netizens to scramble for discussion, and most of them supported this regulation, feeling that bad artists did not deserve another chance, and it was already good if they were not severely punished, and they wanted to appear again, which was simply wishful thinking and completely impossible.

Therefore, the impact of bad artists is not as simple as it seems. There is a saying called "one hundred merits", which means that even if these bad artists have a good image in front of the public before, as long as they are involved in breaking the law, they will be spurned by everyone and will not be able to raise their heads. And this undesirable influence often stays with them for a lifetime and cannot be erased.

It is precisely for this reason that I very much support this new regulation issued by the Radio, Film and Television Bureau.

I'm very supportive of it, because the social impact of bad artists is so bad that they shouldn't be given a chance to make a comeback.

What I support, the behavior of many artists is really bad now, but as soon as he speaks, there will be a lot of fans with rhythm below, and this kind of thing will have to stop after a while.

I support it, because the entertainment industry is exposed to the spotlight and is watched by the people of the whole country, if bad artists are used, then it will set a bad example for the people and affect the influence of our country.

I support this rule because if a bad artist can be on TV, it is unfair to other artists and a wrong example.

I think this rule is actually very good, because these artists themselves are not good role models as public figures.

I support this rule because those bad artists have a very bad negative impact on fans and audiences, and they must be severely punished.

I support this rule, which serves as a wake-up call for artists to be more mindful of what they say and do.

The first point; Artists who do not love their own country, as well as artists who insult the country or do things that harm the country. There are also artists who have violated the law and committed crimes.

The second point; There is no positive energy. People who use their popularity to often cause trouble.

does not provide opportunities for bad artists to appear in public, I think there are a lot of scandals, and artists with very low quality belong to bad artists.

Drug. As a public figure, he did not set a good example for his fans, but broke the law and concealed his behavior.

I think that if you violate the public's three views, you can be regarded as a bad artist, because most people's three views are the standard.

does not provide opportunities for bad artists to appear in public to speak out, I think those who have played a bad leading role in the society, brought bad social atmosphere, and have bad character are all bad artists.

Recently, the State Administration of Radio, Film and Television issued Announcement No. 78 of 2020, which mainly strengthens the guidance and regulation of online show live broadcasts and e-commerce live broadcasts, strengthens guidance and value guidance, creates a healthy ecology of the industry, and prevents and curbs the breeding and spread of bad practices such as vulgarity, vulgarity, and kitsch. Another prominent point is that it does not provide opportunities for bad artists to appear in public to speak out, so as to prevent and curb the spread of bad habits such as showing off wealth and worshiping money, vulgarity and kitsch in the field of live broadcasting! How is this bad artist standard evaluated, let's analyze it for you, and let's give you a few examples to illustrate.

Roughly summarize what are the bad deeds. Pornography, false information, deception and inducement of consumers, and selling counterfeit goods are not allowed. In response to these, the State Administration of Radio, Film and Television finally issued a new regulation:

Once the anchor is blacklisted, they will not be given the opportunity to appear on camera and speak out!

The definition of this standard of bad deeds is to see how netizens agree with his incident, and whether her adverse impact on society and netizens is serious?

As a public figure, the behavior of violating laws and regulations, causing a negative impact on society, and not conducive to the spread of positive energy in society is considered a bad deed.

I think this kind of regulation is particularly good, and artists with bad deeds should be resisted to a certain extent, and some unhealthy trends should not be allowed to become market-dominant.

The regulations of the State Administration of Radio, Film and Television are mainly aimed at the live broadcast industry, and now the live broadcast of major online platforms can be said to be all the rage, and the content is also varied, emerging in endlessly, because of the emerging and popular nature of this industry, so at present, there are actually not many express provisions or legal provisions for live broadcasting, which has led to the current situation of this industry, and there are always some speculative people who seek profit for themselves through improper methods for their own selfish interests.

Therefore, this time, the State Administration of Radio, Film and Television has made provisions on many aspects of live broadcasting, such as first evaluating and managing the platform and personnel of the live broadcast, requiring the platform to classify the content of the live broadcast, and registering the tips of the live broadcast room with real names, and not allowing minors to reward behavior, and at the same time limiting the amount of rewards, and adding a reward delay system, if it is found that the anchor or the live broadcast content has violated laws and regulations, the reward can be withdrawn in time, which is very important for ** It can be said that the audience of the live broadcast is very important, if you find out that you have been deceived or deceived at the first time, there is still time to recover your bounty.

In addition, it stipulates that artists with bad deeds will not be given the opportunity to appear in public, which is undoubtedly a strong preventive shot for artists, which means that if artists take any illegal measures, it is tantamount to self-destruction of their future, and there is no place to survive and develop in the entertainment industry in the future. We have seen a lot of artists involved in pornography and drugs eventually boycotted by the public and major platforms, so what the country advocates is still positive and positive, and the market must also be dominated by these, if the market is flooded with a large number of bad information or phenomena, it is not only our next generation that will be destroyed, but also the atmosphere of the entire society.

Therefore, we welcome such clear regulations of the State Administration of Radio, Film and Television, let us work together to build a safe and healthy network environment!

is unreasonable, criminals can appeal, why can't bad artists tell the truth, it's not in the development of this industry

Support this provision, if you make a mistake, you should pay for your mistakes, the salary of artists themselves is much higher than that of ordinary people, some artists can earn back money that others can't earn in their lifetime when they go on two shows, and after they make mistakes, they have already had a bad impact on the public society, if they continue to be active in front of the camera and get a high salary, it will not only bring bad atmosphere in the entertainment industry, but also be very unfair to others.

Regarding the provision of not providing opportunities for bad artists to speak publicly, I personally support it, and I also think that this should become an attitude, so that some artists should not have a fluke mentality to do things that violate the law and discipline.

Expressions of approval. Because the past behavior of bad artists has had a bad impact on society, they should no longer be connived up.

Regarding the provision of not providing opportunities for bad artists to speak publicly, I personally think this regulation is very good, because it can clean up the atmosphere of the entertainment industry and create a good entertainment industry and environment.

It's okay to be a little more tolerant, it's okay to speak out, but it's okay for the public not to accept it. This opportunity is provided to see how you use it.

does not provide opportunities for bad artists to appear in public to speak out, and the State Administration of Radio, Film and Television has issued such a notice. Then it caused a strong response on the Internet, because the development of the entertainment industry is in full swing, but it feels too chaotic. Although the State Administration of Radio, Film and Television did not point out the list of bad artists, the promulgation of this clause will definitely play a positive role in promoting the development of the entertainment industry.

After all, there are too many artists who have bad deeds but have comebacks, which will bring news to my country's interpretation career.

First, it is conducive to the development of the entertainment industry. In fact, the entertainment industry is a trip to troubled waters, and there are countless artists with bad deeds. For example, tax evasion, such as drug abuse, such as eating, drinking, prostitution, gambling, etc., if these are ordinary people, there may be legal sanctions, but after all, they have eaten the entertainment industry, and after accepting the legal sanctions, they really shouldn't come back.

If you can still return to the entertainment industry again and make a lot of money, it will really affect the development of the entertainment industry.

Second, it will play a positive role in the values of young people. The vast majority of the group chasing stars are teenagers, their thinking and values are in a period of formation, if there is no positive guidance at this special age, it will play a reverse role in the formation of their values, and when they grow up, the negative effect is immeasurable. Therefore, we must reshape the style of the entertainment industry, and artists with bad deeds must no longer be active in people's sight.

Third, it is hoped that all departments will strictly implement it. It is good to have a policy proposed, and I hope that all departments can strictly implement it, and I hope that a specific measure will be introduced to give the entertainment industry a correct orientation. Since artists are public figures, they have the responsibility to lead by example, if they can't play a positive leading role, then disappearing in the entertainment industry is also an inevitable choice, and I hope that all departments can take active action to rectify the unhealthy trends in the entertainment industry.