Should menstrual cramp leave be rolled out nationwide? Should women be protected?

I don't think it should be, from a personal point of view, dysmenorrhea leave is good for women, but from the perspective of the employer, it will cause a lot of inconvenience to the employer, and women should be protected, but not overprotective.

It should be promoted nationwide, because it is really not easy for women, menstrual cramps are very painful, it is difficult to maintain normal work, and women should be protected.

Of course, it should be promoted throughout the country, and women should also be protected, because they are under a lot of pressure in society.

It should be promoted throughout the country, as women's rights and interests can be fully protected. I think women should be protected because they are a vulnerable group.

I don't think menstrual cramp leave should be promoted nationwide, and from the perspective of Oki, on the contrary, it is likely to make it more difficult for women to find it. Therefore, I think that this dysmenorrhea leave should not be promoted nationwide, but should call on and advocate humanized management of enterprises and more humanistic care. In addition, there is no need to think about menstrual pain leave, first implement the existing weekends and statutory holidays, which is already very good, and now many companies' weekends and statutory holidays are not necessarily guaranteed, which is more conducive to reducing unfair treatment of women in the workplace.

In fact, most women will suffer from varying degrees of dysmenorrhea, and severe dysmenorrhea will indeed affect normal work. Because this is not a pain that everyone can feel, many people will express their confusion when facing female dysmenorrhea, and they are even more cynical about women who think that "exaggerated performance", thinking that this girl is too squeamish, in fact, this is just the result of insufficient empathy and empathy.

Therefore, under what circumstances can it be recognized as "dysmenorrhea leave" has become a difficult thing to standardize, and it has brought great difficulties to the company's management assessment.

If the whole country promotes "dysmenorrhea leave", although many female employees with serious dysmenorrhea will benefit from it, it is inevitable that there will be people who touch fish, are not real dysmenorrhea or mild dysmenorrhea but take the reason for leave of absence due to dysmenorrhea, and the number of these people should not be small. As long as there are more such people, employers will think that most people who apply for leave due to menstrual cramps are making up reasons to take leave. As a result, there will be more caution and bias in hiring female employees.

I think it should be rolled out nationwide. It is undeniable that the clarification of "dysmenorrhea leave" is a big step forward for society, which means that people are concerned about the difficulties faced by women in the workplace and provide legal protection for women with dysmenorrhea to take reasonable leave. However, on the other hand, the emergence of "dysmenorrhea leave" may also exacerbate the employment pressure of women.

Since the fundamental purpose of the existence of enterprises is to make profits, the establishment of "dysmenorrhea leave" will indeed increase the potential employment costs of female employees to a certain extent. As a result, many female netizens began to be anxious, whether the emergence of "dysmenorrhea leave" will make companies ask "Are you married" and "When do you plan to have children" when recruiting, and then add a sentence "Do you have severe menstrual cramps to the point where you need to take leave". As a result, policies that appear to be women-friendly can easily backfire if they are not actually implemented.

First of all, it should be clear that "dysmenorrhea leave" should not just stay in an abstract concept, many girls who have experienced dysmenorrhea know that people with real dysmenorrhea may not even be able to get out of bed when they are blocked, so how can they go to the hospital for diagnosis? Moreover, if you have to go to the hospital every month for menstrual cramps, it will take more than half a day to inquire in the hospital, and the purpose of rest will not be achieved, but a lot of time will be invested, which can be said to be more than worth the loss.

Therefore, the government should take more responsibility for enforcement. The government should not only play the role of formulating policies, but should also assume more responsibility for the implementation of "menstrual pain leave". In the final analysis, the company is still running for profit to maintain the company's long-term operation.