Athlon XP2500 and 754 Flashdragon 2500 Who should I choose?

Obviously, Athlon, NF3 can. Playing a few mini-games is enough.

xp2500+ nf3

Of course, it's Athlon 2500+, Flashdragon = Celeron Celeron Athlon = Pentium...

Of course, the motherboard is C51 chip number, and the first grade is NF3, NF2, and the worst VIA K8.

Intel doesn't have much choice at this level. In the AGP era, Intel basically lost to AMD.

It's good to choose the XP2500.

If it's expensive, choose that.

I feel like it's c51 good.

The CPU, of course, is Athlon.

Haha: No, I didn't say that.

Flash Dragon is probably not good at playing games.

Since the landlord only plays simple online games, it is recommended that you match Intel's CPU, although its game performance is not as good as AMD, but playing simple online games is still in the past, and Intel's computing speed is stronger than AMD.

Both the AMD Athlon XP 2500+ and the AMD Sempron 2500+ have 462 and 754 interfaces, with the 754 interface being 64-bit technology. It's better to find AMD Sempempsaurus 3000+, after all, it's not much worse now, and if you can get higher, it's higher.

See which one you can buy, this grade of CPU is recommended to use AMD, at this time the K8 architecture is in full swing, and the performance is better than that of Bensi and Celeron.

It's up to you to find an ASUS NF2 motherboard or something like that, and now the 754 motherboard is generally about 200 yuan. The key is whether you can find something satisfying.

Colorful MK8AS-754

Mingzhi 754-pin motherboard.

Shuojing SK-NF250-SRL

Foxconn 754 interface 761GXK8MC-RS

ASUS K8V-VM motherboard.

ASUS SIS760 K8S-LA

Elite K8M800-M3

Silver Fox Via K8T800 754 pins.

ASUS K8T800 754-pin motherboard.

Gigabyte K8NS Pro

Pansho EP-8KDA3+

These all support your CPU and graphics card, memory.

Of course, it's XP2500+ and NF2, but it must be the XP 2500+ of the L2 512K Barton core, and the BARTON 2500+ can be directly on the NF2 to become 3200+, and the performance at this time is very strong, as strong as the performance of Athlon64 3000+ and NF3... If the SP2500+ wants to catch up with the Athlon's 64 3000+, the only way is to overclock, at least to make up for the huge gap caused by the lack of L2 cache...

I say so you probably know which one is good ...

And the ls of the ls.,You're too dark.。。。 140。。。Look at the model is just KT600...

It's so expensive to sell and grab money... On Taobao second-hand NF2 is no more than 100... Don't say you're new ...

Even if it's new, what's the point of buying a new motherboard... Advertising can't do the same...

The best way to support the performance of these accessories is the NF3 motherboard.

With the addition of a 754 CPU, the performance is not bad.

The Athlon 2500 also has 754 stitches, so it's best to be able to find it. If the Athlon 2500 you see is not 754, then it is recommended to use the Sempron 2500, the performance will not be much worse than the Athlon, and with the advantages of the motherboard, the performance will not be weak.

This is a diamond NF3 chip motherboard, refer to it.

Of course, it's Athlon 2500+, Flashdragon = Celeron Celeron Athlon = Pentium...

Of course, the motherboard is C51 chip number, and the first grade is NF3, NF2, and the worst VIA K8.

Intel doesn't have much choice at this level. In the AGP era, Intel basically lost to AMD.

Without hesitation, the speed dragon XP2500+, if it is the Barton core, it can exceed 3200+

I feel like it's c51 good.

The CPU, of course, is Athlon.

Haha: No, I didn't say that.

Flash Dragon is probably not good at playing games.

754 Sempron 2500+ plus nForce3 250 motherboard, because Barton is super but the heat is amazing. And the U of the 754 can not only be super but also have less heat.

Obviously, Athlon, NF3 can. Playing a few mini-games is enough.

Play games, of course, AMD is a fool who knows.

Athlon XP2500+, 1st floor are you a fool What questions do people ask

The Athlon 2500 you said was last year's mainstream CPU, the 478-pin AthlonXP 2500+, and now the new 64-bit Athlon is the lowest one with more than 800 yuan Athlon 2800+.

The original Athlon XP2500+ has a very good performance, with 512K L2 cache, the main frequency, and the overclocking performance is also very good, and it is respected as a generation of overclocking kings. However, this year's mainstream is 754-pin Sempron 64 2500+, which is different from XP2500+, Semploon 2500+ has a low frequency, for, the L2 cache is smaller, it is 256K, but the production process is more advanced, it is 90nm technology, it also supports SSE3, and it is a 64-bit processor.

From the point of view of performance, in the default state, Athlon XP2500+ relies on a high main frequency and L2 cache, which has a slight upper hand in the test score, but Sempron 2500+ relies on advanced production technology to narrow this gap, and in terms of overclocking, Sempron 2500+ is more prominent, generally able to go up to 300 external frequencies, and the performance is very strong. The main thing is that it is 64 bits, and from that point of view, it already has an advantage.

So, on the whole, it's better to have a Sparkling Dragon 2500+.

Of course Athlon, just like P4 and Celeron.

It's just that the gap isn't that big.

The XP 2600+ comes in two kinds, one with T-B core and one with Barton core; The reason why XP 2500+ is popular is that it can be super, basically it can be super to 3200+, so it is strong, while the XP 2600+ of the T-B core can hardly be supercharged at all; The XP 2600+ at the Barton core can't be higher than the 2500+.

The 462 port Barton is 2500 better.

Barton's can be over 3200 without voltage (non-tabula rasa).

Of those CPUs you're talking about, the Athlonxp 2500+ Barton has the best performance, and the Barton is a classic of the year, with good overclocking and performance. Even now, it can meet your daily needs very well.

Upstairs, 3000+ no x2.

It's all rubbish, and now if you want to buy a CPU, you can buy AMD AM2 Athlon64X2 3000+

Intel Core E6300, if you want to buy a cheap one, AMD also wants to buy a single-core processor with AM2 interface, and Intel wants to buy a Pentium D820

AMD inside Athlonxp 2500+ Barton good.

Intel inside Celeron D good.

Yes, with 754, you should buy Celeron. The AMD of the 754 is not very stable.

CPU Sempron 2500+ has three versions, I don't know which one yours is?

One is 462, one is socket 754, and one is am2.

CPU4800+ is an interface for AM2.

The 754 of the 2800 32-bit is the main frequency. 64-bit is the main frequency.

I have a piece of 2800 overclocking performance that is not good. It may have something to do with my SIS755 board. And the original 462's 2500 is over 2G, and there is no problem with the 754 feeling better, after all, the motherboard is relatively new.

AMD's main frequency is not high, especially in the low-end gear, the interfaces are not the same, not necessarily the main frequency is high, and U runs fast. Athlon's u is good wow, I still have a machine here that is ES's Athlon3000+ and there is no problem, direct 200*10 stable operation

PS: If you want to overclock the power supply and memory, you have to choose well

Landlord, you go to ** find 754 2800 with 2g.

Of course, it's the 754-needle Sempempron 2800+ (

The scaling values of AMD CPUs are relatively accurate. As long as it is the value indicated above. Basically, it can be achieved.

If you're a gamer, AMD is a great choice. However, the calorific value is larger. Compare power consumption. Hehe.

I read it wrong, it turned out to be 462, I thought it was 754's 2800+, this must be 2500+, this is equivalent to P4

2800+ is equivalent to Celeron.

It's definitely 2500+ fast.

It's not a grade thing, of course, you have to choose the Athlon2500. For example, the new one, now the Athlon 3000+ is 370 yuan, and the Shining Dragon 3200 is only 280, which one will you choose.

The same type of CPU, the low frequency is better, like the previous AthlonXP1700+, XP2500+, Celeron A300, Celeron and so on are all like this, and the current SEPRON 2500+ and P4 506 and Celeron D331 are all better processors. The 2800+ overclocking performance is slightly worse.

That's right, because the external frequency of 2800+ itself is relatively high, so it is not as good as the 2500+, which has a relatively low external frequency.

Indeed it is! Sempron 2500+ is currently the most cost-effective CPU! Overclocked to match 3000+!The overclocking performance of the Sempron 2800+ is not as good as that of the 2500+

This thing is not absolute

The performance improvement is not ordinary, and the L2 cache of the Athlon series is 2 times that of Sempron.

It also has a big advantage in terms of frequency, especially when it comes to gaming.

Because the 754-pin does not have a dual-core U, your Turbo 3400+ is the best CPU for the 754-pin.

There's no need to think about upgrading in the future, the 3400+ Athlon with 1G DDR400 RAM is almost perfect.

Now Athlon 64 x2 3600+ 3800+ are all cabbage prices, if you want to change them, you can change them to 3600+ and 3800+, they are both dual-core, overclocking is also very good, and it is definitely enough to play games.

Depressed, you have to see if the stitches are the same first

It is recommended to switch to the 754 series mobile version of the CPU Vertigo ML-40 and all current 754-pin master versions are compatible. Moreover, the manufacturing process and quality control are better than those of the desktop Athlon. After all, it's for laptops.

Main frequency: 128K 2 slow, 1m rated power: 35W After the machine is up, the CPU is generally a few degrees more than the room temperature.

If your board is NF4, the overclocking potential is invincible, and if you add voltage to exceed the power consumption of 80, it is equivalent to the normal power of a desktop CPU.

My classmate is using the Dazzling Dragon ML-40 plus NF4, and now Taobao seems to have a small number of goods, you can take a look.

When playing WIII at the default frequency, the progress bar is faster than my 3600+x2. Big brother, I really used it. It's not like I say what others say.,The only drawback is that you can't install Tomato-optimized XP.,It may be that Tomato has deleted what is compatible with mobile CPUs.。

If it's all 754, you might be able to buy a bad CPU.

In addition, you can empty the CMOS and take a look at it, and jump off the jumper next to the battery.

The sempron 2500+ also has a 462 interface.

I just bought it, I recommend you push it off, and buy a 3200+ set directly, with a motherboard is only 120 pieces!