WHAT IS THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN THE NIKON 55 300MM VR AND THE 70 300MM VR??? Which one is better, I m

The difference is very big, the 70-300 VR lens is in FX format (can be used for full-frame SLR), 55-300 is a DX format lens, which can only be used for non-full-frame cameras, your D3100 is non-full-frame, or use 55-300, the focal length segment and lens format are more matched, of course, if you have plans to change to a full-frame camera in the future, you can also be in place at one time, but the 70-300VR lens is more wasteful on the D3100.

Nikon AF-S DX VR 55-200mm F IF-ED Lens:

Features: Medium telephoto VR shock absorption ED ultra-low dispersion glass Quiet wave motor Lightweight and compact Cheap and good.

Others: Perfect match with 18-55mm.

Second lens for D5100, D3100 users.

This lens is produced in Chinese mainland, relatively low cost, ** cheap, good quality, cost performance is a highlight!

Next up is the Nikon AF-S VR 70-300mm F IF-ED

Quiet Wave Motor (SWM) VR II Shock Absorption System, equivalent to raising the shutter speed in four stops 2 pieces of ultra-low dispersion (ED) glass.

M A mode quick switching between auto and manual focus Light weight of only 745 grams Equivalent to 105-450mm on DX format digital cameras When used on DX format DSLR cameras, the peripheral part of the lens is not used, and the peripheral part of the lens and the inner part of the lens are not comparable in performance.

This lens is made in Thailand, has a longer focal length, and is suitable for telephoto weapons, ** and moderate!

The ** of both lenses is relatively low-end, and the quality of Nikon's products has nothing to say. But one thing to note is that the aperture of these two lenses is not large, and a large aperture is not a panacea, but a large aperture is always there to help you when you need it most, depending on what you actually need!

The difference between the previous two is almost the same, just one sentence: choose 70-300 for the pursuit of picture quality, and 55-300 for lightness; Personally, I tend to be 70-300, and the speed and accuracy of focusing are really different.

The footage is newly released; 70-300 has been around for some time. It is a DX format lens, which can only be used on the APS-C body, not full-frame; And 70-300 is a full-frame lens. The second-generation VR anti-shake technology is adopted, and the effect is more obvious.

The new lens group structure design is adopted, which greatly reduces the volume and weight; Of course, the 70-300 is also quite lightweight.

The 55-300VR is an APS lens, and the cost is lower than the full head, so it is much cheaper.

The 55-300VR is Nikon's newer product, and the style of the film is different from that of the 70-300VR. Nikon's current lenses are no longer focused on sharpness and high contrast, and the imaging is becoming softer and softer, which is due to changes in digital development. These two heads are on APS, the focal length and angle of view are exactly the same, if you are generally at home, it is enough to buy 55-300VR, **cheap and lightweight.

That's enough.

To add. The 55-300 can be seen as an upgrade of the 55-200. If it is full in the future, it will be wasted. And 70-300 quality is better.

If you want to choose, it's better to choose 70-300.

Nikon VR 55-200mm F IF-ed, the original color is relatively positive, and the Tamron lens is more or less yellowish.

Second, the medium telephoto lens, with VR is a very practical function.

3. If possible, go to Nikon 70-300 VR, this one is better!

The former is APS-C and the latter is full-frame.

How about the Nikon 70-300VR?

How about the Nikon 70-300VR?

I'm a Nikon user, and I also have this lens, and it feels pretty good.

This lens is lightweight, easy to use, although it can't be compared with tens of thousands of lenses, but as an ordinary enthusiast, it is also enough for us to use or create, after all**low, the quality of a lens, really lies in our users, if you study carefully, the best efficiency of this dog's head can be brought into play, the same can shoot excellent works, this lens is not a constant aperture, but it still has a good bokeh effect when shooting flowers or portraits, etc., and this lens has anti-shake, In the case that the speed cannot keep up, the production rate is improved. Personally, in the process of use, I feel that if the light is good, the quality of the work is still very good.

If you are a half-frame camera and the economy is not too generous, it is also a good choice to buy a telephoto. If you want to be a little better, you can choose the 70-200 lens of the auxiliary factory, which is about 5,000.

In the end, I hope you choose the lens that you are satisfied with.

The above is a little bit of my opinion, welcome friends to supplement and discuss.

Telephoto lens generally we in our own lens equipment, are will occupy a very important proportion, need telephoto bokeh or to pull into the focus distance, we will choose telephoto lens to shoot, shoot flowers and birds to shoot portrait works, shoot local close-up, it can be said that the telephoto is used to it, it is still very convenient.

Telephoto lens generally we in our own lens equipment, are will occupy a very important proportion, need telephoto bokeh or to pull into the focus distance, we will choose telephoto lens to shoot, shoot flowers and birds to shoot portrait works, shoot local close-up, it can be said that the telephoto is used to it, it is still very convenient.

af-svr70-300mm

F IF-ED lens, this lens, in the same price range, has the best image quality.

The poor man's bull's head", many people call it "little donkey cannon". The shock absorption of 2 gears of VR can meet most of the time of handheld shooting, 70--200mmThe imaging quality of the focal length is quite good in the daytime, and the imaging of the 200-300mm segment is relatively slightly different, and the aperture problem also makes the positioning of this lens not very high, but it does not prevent this from being a very good lens, many people will hang such a lens on the half-frame machine, which is light and convenient, and the focal length does not shrink.

af-svr70-300mm

F IF-ED lens, this lens, in the same price range, has the best image quality.

The poor man's bull's head", many people call it "little donkey cannon". The shock absorption of 2 gears of VR can meet most of the time of handheld shooting, 70--200mmThe imaging quality of the focal length is quite good in the daytime, and the imaging of the 200-300mm segment is relatively slightly different, and the aperture problem also makes the positioning of this lens not very high, but it does not prevent this from being a very good lens, many people will hang such a lens on the half-frame machine, which is light and convenient, and the focal length does not shrink.

The 70-300 does not meet the needs of graduation photos on the APS-C body, but the focal length of 18-55 is more practical, so you don't need to buy this kind of medium and long photo head in the short term, but should upgrade the scaling hang-up head.

But in the case of a small budget and occasionally using a longer focal length, you can indeed consider the so-called "end of the world" such as 18-200VR - so it is recommended to get rid of 18-55, change to 18-105 140 200VR or the same focal length of the sub-factory head (generally speaking, the larger the zoom head, the worse the image quality, so you have to make a compromise in image quality and focal length), and buy a 35 - in this way, you can cope with various occasions, including character bokeh.

Lenses with VR (Tamron called VS, suitable for OS) have an anti-shake function, and after turning on anti-shake, it can generally meet the handheld shooting of 200 or longer focal lengths in full light conditions, and it is not comfortable to travel with a tripod (unless the subject of photography is traveling), so whether to use a tripod purely depends on their respective needs.

After reading a few answers upstairs just now, I would like to add: the 55-70 focal length vacated by the combination of 18-55 and 70-300 is precisely the focal length that is more commonly used in APS-C camera close-ups of people; At the same time, even if you buy 70-300, it still can't solve the problem of upgrading 18-55, so how to choose still needs to be decided according to your actual situation.

If you buy 18-200, you will have the same focal length as your current 18-55 (equivalent to the uselessness of the 18-55 lens), and I don't think there is any need to buy a lens like this. If you buy 70-300, there is no repetition in the focal length, and the telephoto end reaches 300, which is much longer than the 18-200. Just change the lens when you need it.

Personally, I think I should buy 70-300

These telephoto lenses are produced on a tripod unless your hands are trained to be as stable as a tripod.

Both of these have very limited bokeh because the aperture is too small. If you want a good portrait effect, buy 85 directly, which is the most suitable for your body.

I mean, you can play with the equipment in your hand thoroughly first, and then talk about the additions.