Similarities and differences between EU and US anti dumping against China

The U.S. anti-dumping agencies are:

1) The U.S. Department of Commerce is responsible for dumping investigations and adjudication, and its subordinate International Administration is responsible for handling specific matters.

2) The U.S. International Commission is responsible for damage investigation and adjudication.

3) The U.S. International Court of Justice is the only U.S. body with the power to conduct judicial review of dumping and injury decisions made by the Department of Commerce and the International Committee. If the International Court of Justice does not agree with the ruling made by the anti-dumping authority, it will be rejected and the anti-dumping authority will make a new decision.

4) U.S. Customs is specifically responsible for the collection of anti-dumping duties. Upon receipt of the collection order issued by the Department of Commerce, U.S. Customs calculates and imposes anti-dumping duties in accordance with the dumping margin determined by the ruling.

5) The U.S. Federal Court of Appeals Circuit has the power to overturn the decisions of U.S. ** courts. However, when an award is rejected by the International Court of Justice and a new decision is required, the Department of Commerce may only file a lawsuit with the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit against the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit.

The anti-dumping agencies in the EU are:

1) The European Commission is the main anti-dumping agency of the European Union, responsible for deciding on matters such as filing, investigation, suspension or termination of cases, imposition of anti-dumping duties and acceptance of ** commitments.

2) The Council of the European Union is the only body in Europe that has the power to order the imposition and imposition of anti-dumping duties.

3) The EU Advisory Committee is composed of representatives of member states and reflects the interests of each member state, so the European Commission must consult the advisory committee at all stages of the trial of anti-dumping cases.

4) The European Court of First Instance is a body with the power to exercise judicial review of decisions made by the European Commission and the Council. The review can be a matter of fact or a matter of law; It can be both a substantive and a procedural issue.

5) The European Court of Justice has the power to overturn the judgment of the European Court of First Instance.

1. Export products should avoid relying on tax rebates.

This and the main hope of this measure is to promote enterprises to increase exports and take the initiative to reduce friction. Reducing or canceling export tax rebates, in the short term, may reduce the export market share of Zhao Paixiang ceramic enterprises, in the long run, it will promote the integration of commodity exports and the return of market order, which is conducive to the improvement of the overall business environment of the industry. The abolition of export subsidies for products also shows a gesture to the EU and other countries that implement anti-dumping, making the international market more fair and just, and reducing overseas risks.

2. Establish an independent brand to cope with competition.

If China's export enterprises want to truly enter the international market, they should better establish brand awareness, increase investment in technological research and development, as well as investment in brand building, enhance the added value of goods, vigorously develop their own core products and core technologies, achieve technological innovation, and promote the upgrading of commodity structure. At the same time, enterprises should carefully study and study various important international standards, such as:

ISO14000, ISO9000, SA8000 family, etc., to ensure that the export products are close to or reach the international level in safety, technology, environmental protection, health and other aspects. Truly promote the internationalization of independent brands.

3. Diversified products to develop the best market.

Export enterprises should advocate diversified business strategies for their products, and when a certain type of product encounters anti-dumping, it will not bring a fatal blow to the enterprise. In addition, enterprises need to open up more foreign markets, increase the number of export regions and countries, and increase foreign market share while also dispersing the risk of suffering from barriers.

4. Enterprises should continue to accelerate the pace of transnational operation, standardize management, and establish a financial system in line with international standards. On the other hand, in response to anti-dumping cases, proving that the export** is not below the "normal value" is the main key.

5. Enterprises should actively respond to lawsuits.

At present, although Chinese enterprises are relatively active in anti-dumping litigation in Europe and the United States, they are not balanced. When facing a foreign anti-dumping lawsuit, as long as China's export enterprises capture and collect information in advance to understand the situation, such as consulting industry associations, Chinese and foreign lawyers, and commercial departments, and taking the initiative to communicate with the relevant ministries of the appellate country, grasp as much as possible the situation of the other country, make full preparations for response, and refuse to fight for it, they will have a chance of winning the lawsuit.

This month refers to the fact that in this month, the United States has made anti-dumping judgments on such products, such as preliminary or final rulings, etc., and generally ruling that anti-dumping duties on certain types of products will be levied from the date of the judgment or a date before that, and will normally last for about 5 years, and then re-investigate whether to continue to collect them when the time comes. If it is not levied, the U.S. side will issue a public announcement stating that it will not be levied.

The basic role of anti-dumping duties imposed by the destination country is twofold: 1) to protect the development of the domestic industry of this product; 2) Restricting the development of the industry of such products in the anti-dumping country. It is a game between countries, and the entanglement of interests is very complicated inside.

The two groups of English words you are talking about are: current prc-wide rate refers to the general tax rate of such products in the United States, and date of ad order refers to the date on which the anti-dumping duty is formulated, where ad should refer to anti-dumping.

At present, it is dealing with foreign anti-dumping and Sino-US war.

Issue! Select Re-export**.

There are more, through the transit of a third country, and the issuance of a complete set of supporting documents (bill of lading, certificate of origin, commercial invoice, packing list.

etc.) first leg departure] - [transit country (import to the bonded area for container exchange, certificate of origin and supporting documents) two trips.

Sea Freight] - [Destination Country].

U.S. customs clearance uses a full set of documents from third countries, thus effectively solving the problem of Made in China.

Direct export to the U.S. problem! The document confirms that the product is produced in the transit country. In this way, direct exports: anti-dumping**, anti-subsidy, China-US surcharges** can be effectively circumvented.

and other unfair treaty restrictions.

Through the above, I hope to help you, if there is a product that needs to avoid anti-dumping, you can ask, or nickname.

I don't know if your list is **, but as far as I know.

1. In this month, it should be that the United States has made an anti-dumping judgment on this type of product, such as a preliminary or final ruling, etc., and generally rules that the anti-dumping duty of a certain type of product will be levied from the date of the judgment or a date before it, and it will normally last for about 5 years, and then re-investigate whether to continue to collect it when the time comes. If it is not levied, the U.S. side will issue a public announcement stating that it will not be levied.

2. The basic role of imposing anti-dumping duties is twofold: 1) to protect the development of the domestic product industry; 2) Restricting the development of the industry of such products in the anti-dumping country. It is a game between countries, and the entanglement of interests is very complicated inside.

3. I don't know which two groups of English words you are referring to? The current prc-wide rate refers to the general tax rate of such products in the United States, and the date of ad order refers to the date on which the anti-dumping duty is formulated, where ad should refer to the meaning of anti-dumping.

Anti-dumping refers to the measures taken to resist the dumping of foreign goods in the domestic market. Generally, in addition to the general import duty on dumped foreign goods, a surcharge is added to make it inexpensive, and this kind of surcharge is called "anti-dumping duty".

For example, the EU imposed anti-dumping duties on China's seamless steel pipes The European Union proposed on September 24 that a formal anti-dumping duty should be imposed on seamless steel pipes produced in China for a period of 5 years, with a tax rate as high as that applicable to seamless steel pipes with circular cross-section and external diameter not exceeding millimeters. The final decision will be submitted by the European Commission to the Council of the European Union for adoption and published by 8 October.

Pros and cons: To put it simply, the pros are to protect domestic enterprises, because the EU's labor costs are high, resulting in high products, and the use of anti-dumping protection measures can make domestic products competitive in the first place; There are generally two disadvantages, one is that domestic consumers cannot buy more high-quality and inexpensive products, and the other is that this kind of protection measures are only temporary, if the competitiveness of the product is not increased, sooner or later it will be eliminated.

The Chinese products targeted by the EU anti-dumping are: fasteners, fiberglass mesh cloth, bicycles, wire ropes, seamless steel pipes, and so on!

We are doing third-country re-exports, aiming at anti-dumping and avoiding anti-dumping duties. If you still have any questions, please contact me and see the information.

What is anti-dumpingAnti-dumping (a-d) refers to the measures taken to resist the dumping of foreign goods in the domestic market. Generally, in addition to the general import duty on dumped foreign goods, a surcharge is added to make it inexpensive, and this kind of surcharge is called "anti-dumping duty". Normal** usually refers to comparable sales of similar products in the exporting country under normal conditions.

If the domestic ** of the product is controlled, it is often confirmed that the export of similar products from a third country is normal**. Unlike the initiation of a countervailing investigation, the injured State of a dumping act is not obliged to consult with the member concerned before initiating an anti-dumping investigation; In examining the impact of dumping on the domestic industry, the magnitude of the dumping margin needs to be taken into account and the dumping margin needs to be determined. The WTO stipulates that the dumping margin shall not exceed 2% of imports.

The import volume of the anti-dumped product does not account for more than 3% of the import of the same kind of product, which is the minimum limit of the dumping margin that can be ignored. The ultimate remedy for anti-dumping is to impose anti-dumping duties on the dumped product. The amount of anti-dumping duties imposed may be equal to or lower than the dumping margin.

Although the anti-dumping investigation has not been concluded, the injured member may take interim measures on the premise that the existence of dumping and the injury caused by it has been preliminarily determined, and that the dumping has been prevented from causing further injury during the course of the investigation, and that the parties have been fully provided with information and an opportunity to express their views. Another remedy is commitment. If the exporter voluntarily makes a satisfactory undertaking to amend** or cease to dump** the export, the investigation procedure may be suspended or terminated without interim measures or anti-dumping duties imposed by the relevant authorities.

As with the initiation of countervailing duty proceedings, a member** should initiate an anti-dumping investigation upon receipt of an application from a domestic enterprise or industry injured by the dumped product. The parties must be notified of the initiation of an investigation. They include the exporter's member**, the exporter or foreign producer, the importer of the product under investigation, trade associations, producers of similar products in the importing country and their trade associations, etc.

If there is insufficient evidence of the existence of dumping and its injury, or if the dumping margin or quantity of dumped imports falls below the minimum limit, the investigation shall be terminated. Under the framework of the WTO, anti-dumping measures can only be taken, not by business and industry. Therefore, a country's business or industry must initiate anti-dumping procedures through **.

The emergence of anti-dumping is the result of the continuous strengthening of the international market, as early as before World War II, dumping has become an important way for many countries to export abroad, so the emergence of anti-dumping, for the solution of such problems, not in a country's unilateral policy implementation, but many countries under a certain agreement to carry out simultaneous policy implementation.