Lawyer please come in, a case that happened to me, please help 50

Criminal proceedings are a matter for the Public Prosecutor's Office, and this is a serious criminal offense, and when a prosecution is filed, it is necessary to request an attached civil lawsuit, which is financial compensation, and the offender may be sentenced to 1 aggravated offense for robbery (causing death due to serious injury) for more than 10 years in prison, life imprisonment or death, 2 or it may be robbery, intentional homicide, and sentenced to death for intentional homicide (if the situation is as you say, this is more accurate).

If the suspect is mentally ill and acts during the onset of the disease, he is not criminally responsible, but you can still claim civil damages, and his guardian is obliged to pay compensation, and if the act was done during the normal period of illness, then it is the same as an ordinary person, there is no difference.

The case must have been prosecuted by the procuratorate, and the charge was intentional injury, and death was considered an aggravating circumstance.

Now it should be in the investigation stage, and if it is at the prosecution stage, the court will notify you, and then you, as a close relative, can request the procuratorate to file a lawsuit with civil compensation.

If there is a mental illness through a forensic evaluation, which constitutes a waiver of punishment, a new evaluation may be requested. However, civil compensation is a certain compensation.

However, in public prosecution cases, the procedural rights of the victim are greatly reduced, which is a shortcoming of criminal prosecution. This is because even the most basic right of appeal can only be exercised through the Public Prosecutor's Office with the consent of the Public Prosecutor's Office.

1. Split the common property. This house is the joint property of your grandparents. Half of the demolition fee belongs to your grandmother, and the other half belongs to your grandfather.

2. Inheritance. Half of your grandfather's, if there is no will, it will be inherited by the legal heirs. According to the provisions of the inheritance law, your grandmother, your father and your four aunts, as the first heirs, have the right to inherit the property if there is no legal loss of inheritance rights.

Others have no right to inherit.

In principle, those who have the right to inherit are divided equally. However, if your father and your mother are responsible for more maintenance obligations, they can claim more points; Where the obligation to support is not fulfilled or is less, it may be claimed that there is less or no less.

3. Solution. It can be resolved through negotiation, but if the negotiation fails, go to the court to file a lawsuit.

Take a look at the relevant provisions of the inheritance law.

What do you want to share? House? The real estate certificate belongs to your grandfather, if he has not died, it is not an inheritance, this house belongs to your grandfather and grandmother, and they are still alive, so you have no right to share this house! What your grandfather and your grandmother do with it is none of your business.

Looking at the inheritance law, the heirs in the first order have the right to inherit.

There is one point that I have not made clear, this friend of mine and he are now remarried, and the marriage has been more than 8 years, is the new marriage law to make a judicial interpretation of rent failure, if the husband and wife are remarried, the time is not more than 8 years, can not divide the joint property of the husband and wife?

It is necessary to clarify whether the house was purchased before or after the remarriage to determine whether it is personal property before the marriage or joint property after the marriage.

This house was bought by the man when the house was reformed after marriage, and now the name written on the real estate certificate is the man's name. In this way, when my friend divorces, will the digger still be able to divide the house, and will he be able to get half of the property?

Can be divided. OK.

You can call the police, and the police will take her home, and she will come once, and you will report once. If you really can't, you can also sue her (if you are under the age of 18, her legal guardian, i.e. her parents, as the defendant) for interfering with your normal life. Ask her to stop interfering.

There is no legal provision for compensation!

So when you talk to them, you can't say it's compensation, at most it can only be regarded as compensation, the amount you both negotiate, as long as the other party accepts, if the other party still asks for a price, you say you won't give a cent.

I'm a lawyer, you can come into my space and see it.

Illegal cohabitation is not accepted by the court. So you can not compensate for related things.

Your cohabitation is consensual, so you are not responsible.

You can call the police to defend your legal expediency.

The cause of the incident was Wang, who was about to dump construction waste at Gao's door, which was an infringement and affected Gao's travel. Article 83 of the General Principles of the Civil Law that violates the law The adjacent parties to the immovable property shall, in accordance with the spirit of conducive to production, convenience of life, solidarity and mutual assistance, fairness and reasonableness, correctly handle the adjacent relationship in terms of water interception, drainage, passage, ventilation, lighting, etc. Where obstructions or losses are caused to neighboring parties, the infringement shall be stopped, the obstruction removed, and the losses compensated.

Tort Liability Law》 Article 6: Where an actor infringes upon the civil rights and interests of others due to his fault, he shall bear tort liability.

2. Gao's stop was to protect his own legitimate rights and interests, and Wang's beating of Gao violated Gao's right to personal health, causing his teeth to fall out. 2 is a minor injury.

3. An administrative lawsuit may be filed to sue the public security organ for the mistake of detaining Gao, and request that the detention decision be revoked and that the losses be compensated.

4. Sue Wang for medical bills, clean up the garbage and apologize.

Bigamy is the offence of having a spouse and marrying another person, i.e. a person having two or more marital relationships at the same time. There are two elements that must be met to constitute bigamy:1

When one or both of the parties have a valid marital relationship. This is a prerequisite for bigamy. If there is no marital relationship between the parties, they are unmarried, divorced or widowed, and do not constitute bigamy2

There are two forms of marriage between a spouse and another person: one is that a spouse registers his marriage with another person, which is legal bigamy; Second, although the marriage has not been registered, but living together with another person as husband and wife, this is a de facto bigamy. In real life, it is basically de facto bigamy as the main manifestation of bigamy.

This shows that only A constitutes the crime of bigamy, and it is recommended to go to the public security organ to report the case and severely punish this husband. For the third party, she does not constitute bigamy, but can only be morally condemned.

In the event of a divorce, according to Article 46 of the current Marriage Law, the innocent party has the right to claim damages under any of the following circumstances, and what is the divorce caused by the at-fault party: (1) bigamy (2) cohabitation of a spouse with another person; (3) According to the information you provided, the company belongs to the joint property of the husband and wife, and I think it is not good for the husband in this case.

Of course, the specific division depends on how the court decides. I'm just talking about jurisprudence. As for b, c, d, and e, because they do not involve the issue of inheritance law, only the issue of alimony, they have little to do with this.

After the couple's property is separated, child support is not a problem.

No jail time. The crime of bigamy is difficult to prove. As long as b does not sue, it is impossible. It's not easy to sue.

The parents are divorced and the children do not share the property together. As long as the agreement between them is successful. It is necessary to show the "evidence" of the man's fault in order to get compensation when dividing the property, and divide more.

If the testamentary heir dies before the decedent, the property determined in the will shall be subject to legal inheritance.

The first will was notarized, and Li Jia's annotation on Li B's will could not be a notarized will. After the death of Li Yi, legal succession should be carried out.

Therefore, Li Jia's property was inherited by Li Bing and Li Ding (subrogation).

FYI.

1. It is recommended that you go to see the strength of the glass door, whether it can fall down at will, or whether they deliberately caused damage because of something, which is very important.

2. Don't sign the agreement, you don't care so much now, it's not up to you to decide if she wants to go, she sues you, and you have to come to the place.

3 When encountering this matter, it is really difficult to handle, and the final cost is not how much they spend, and the court will sentence how much, you can rest assured that there is still the principle of fairness.

It's an accident, and you're probably going to have to pay for the medical bills. Therefore, it can be resolved through negotiation.

This is a civil dispute, and there is no great harm, the inspection is inevitable, and finally the medical expenses are at the point of compensation.