Simba s bird s nest was revealed to be sugar water, what do you think about it?

Updated on amusement 2024-03-11
8 answers
  1. Anonymous users2024-02-06

    Personally, I feel quite disappointed, although I haven't watched Simba's live broadcast, but he is also a famous person, and he actually starts selling fakes now, which is indeed a little sorry for his fans.

  2. Anonymous users2024-02-05

    There are indeed many problems with Internet celebrity products, and about the fact that Simba's bird's nest was exposed as sugar water, before the results of the investigation come out, you can't slander Simba at will, or don't make a conclusion.

  3. Anonymous users2024-02-04

    This problem should be treated rationally, and you can't believe that bird's nest is sugar water through some words from others, if he sells fake goods, the relevant departments will deal with it.

  4. Anonymous users2024-02-03

    I think they have no professional ethics because they deliberately sell some fake bird's nests that are very cheap, which is an act of deceiving consumers.

  5. Anonymous users2024-02-02

    No one can say for sure about this kind of thing, each has its own reasons, maybe Simba was deliberately planted by others, everyone should pay attention to live shopping.

  6. Anonymous users2024-02-01

    Whether the online celebrity live broadcast products are credible or not, on the one hand, we can't listen to one-sided words, on the other hand, we must also maintain a rational consumption mentality when buying things in the live broadcast.

  7. Anonymous users2024-01-31

    Simba's team is suspected of selling counterfeits

    On December 23, 2020, the Guangzhou Municipal Market Supervision Bureau notified the investigation and handling of the parties involved in the "Simba Live Streaming Instant Bird's Nest" incident.

    Because the bird's nest sold in the live broadcast room was questioned as "sugar water", the suspected sale of fake goods by the Internet celebrity anchor Simba's team attracted attention. The Guangzhou Municipal Administration for Market Regulation reported on the 23rd that Guangzhou Heyi E-commerce **** (hereinafter referred to as "Heyi Company"), as the operator of the live broadcast room involved, was entrusted by Guangzhou Rongyu ****** (hereinafter referred to as "Rongyu Company"), the commodity brand, to arrange the anchor "Shida Beautiful" to promote the product "Mingzhi Bowl Flavored Instant Bird's Nest" through the Kuaishou live broadcast platform on September 17 and October 25, 2020.

  8. Anonymous users2024-01-30

    The truth of the Simba bird's nest incident is that there was improper publicity for the sale of bird's nest in the Xinxuan live broadcast room, and the product information provided by the brand was misleading, and the bird's nest flavored drink was mistakenly promoted as a bird's nest product. The product itself is up to standard and meets the national food standards, but there is a controversy in the bird's nest industry standard.

    Xin Xuan apologized to consumers for this matter, and will assume responsibility for improper promotion, and immediately recall the product sold, and submit"Refund one and pay three"、"Advance payout"compensatory measures. Let's not talk about the division of responsibilities with the brand, the first priority is to solve the doubts and concerns of consumers, and Xinxuan will never cover up dishonest business behavior.

Related questions
37 answers2024-03-11

Simba responded that the bird's nest is sugar water, saying that it contains bird's nest acid, but in fact, the bird's nest acid contained in this bird's nest contains only 10,000 bird's nest acid, and the protein content of this bird's nest is zero, which does not meet the standard of "the protein content in bird's nest is about 30%-50%" in the quality regulations of various grades of bird's nest. Therefore, it is not necessarily bird's nest that contains bird's nest acid.

26 answers2024-03-11

According to the latest news reports on the Internet, the Simba fake bird's nest incident has been intervened by relevant departments, and Simba has been placed on file for investigation, and Simba may also face 15 years in prison. For Simba's shoddy in the live broadcast room, it can only be said that no one can escape the punishment of the law, if Simba still sells to consumers under the premise of knowing that this product is a fake, then his behavior must be strictly punished by the law, if he is unaware, then he must also bear the corresponding responsibility for his own mistakes. >>>More

13 answers2024-03-11

It doesn't count. What they say about fake one-dollar compensation is just a kind of comfort in words. When something really happens, they only think about how to avoid it, rather than solve it head-on.

42 answers2024-03-11

Because although he sells goods, he is not a producer after all, and to be honest, he is actually a victim, so he will naturally go to the manufacturer to explain the law, instead of losing money himself.

12 answers2024-03-11

It's not pretended! I was just complimented, sorry!!