Do my in laws have the right to interfere with our sale of our house, and do my in laws have the rig

The house belongs to the two of you, and the in-laws have no right to interfere. But you can communicate with them, and if they don't agree, see if they can come up with another solution, and if they can't think of it, they can only do it according to you.

Hard-hitting can only hurt both sides, why don't you sit down and discuss it well, and discuss everything calmly. The elders must have their own reasons for opposing it, and listening to their opinions, there is no question of whether they are accustomed or not. If you communicate more, you will definitely find a solution that satisfies both parties.

It's not that the hukou falls on **, so you have control over the **'s house, the two are completely separate and unrelated. There are many houses that are still owned by relatives and friends, but this does not mean that these relatives and friends have the right to control the property. If your mother and your father did not ask for the house when they agreed to divorce, that is, the house belongs to your father, then he does not need anyone's consent to deal with it.

Since the house belongs to the in-laws, no matter how many years you have been married, whether you are widowed or not, whether you remarry or not, the in-laws have the right to sell the house, because it is their property.

No, the mother-in-law is the first heir, the son is the second heir, and the daughter-in-law is not involved.

If there are only two mothers and sons, the son has half of the father's share.

The disposal of the house is subject to the consent of the ison.

If the child is underage, the parents have guardianship and support obligations to the child, sell the house, and need to place the child to live, if the child is over 18 years old and belongs to the adult, the parents have no guardianship and support obligations to the child, the child is willing to live, and the parents have no obligation to place the child.

The house can be sold publicly, and the child has no right to interfere.

Is it an old house, or a house in a small city, if you have to change to a new house, you can consider changing it nearby. In fact, if you change to a new house, you only have the right to use it for 70 years, and if you want a good house, 270,000 yuan for home decoration and furniture is probably not enough. The elderly are the most important, and no matter how much housing prices fall, they will have their own nest to live in.

The elderly don't like to change the environment, so let's think about it.

Communicate well with your mother-in-law and explain the house price to her.

And if you buy a house again, you can also promise to come back regularly to visit or take her to live with you, good words are the key to happiness, I believe you can do it.

From a legal point of view, the father-in-law has no rights, if the father-in-law is really good for his son, he should do more peace, like this father-in-law is rare, he seriously affects your relationship like this! Maybe at some point he will regret it! Be patient and try to avoid your own causes!

There is no such right.

It's your husband's problem that has ulterior motives.

It depends on whose name is on the real estate certificate, if it is the child's name, your in-laws can't sell it, because the child's signature is required to transfer the ownership.

If it is your in-laws' name, legally the house belongs to your in-laws, and you have no right to interfere with what they do.

If the title deed is in the child's name, it will be fine, otherwise it will not work.

It depends on whose name the title deed is.

1. After the divorce, the man can dispose of the house allocated to the man at will, and the woman has no right to interfere.

2. If the house is jointly owned by the husband and wife and the property has not been divided after the divorce, the man has no right to dispose of it before the actual division of the property is completed, and the woman has the right to interfere.

3. If the divorce agreement stipulates otherwise on the disposal of the house, determine whether the husband has the right to dispose of it alone in accordance with the provisions of the divorce agreement.

It belongs to the joint property of the husband and wife, in fact, you are a bona fide third party, your agreement is valid, the law is protected, even if you go to the court, the house is yours, and his wife will ask his ex-husband for compensation, which has nothing to do with you.

Of course you can't buy it, the owner is not sure, no one has the right to sell to you!

This matter involves many legal relationships and is more complex, so it is recommended to consult a local lawyer in person with relevant information, as this problem cannot be specifically solved here. I think there are two issues that need to be understood: first, how the divorce settlement disposes of the house, and you need to look at their agreement at that time; Second, whether Lupin really didn't know.

These two issues may have a greater impact on the present case. Due to the complexity of the matter, only these two points are mentioned here, and the specific operation still needs to consult the local lawyer, and the lawyer will make an accurate judgment after understanding all the circumstances. The above is for reference only.