What do you think about the Audi owner s refusal to pay the driver fee and verbally abusing and beat

The substitute driver shall pay the owner of the car a reasonable **. was beaten and abused by the owner of the car. The discharge diagnosis issued by the hospital was "nasal contusion and laceration, multiple soft tissue contusions all over the body".

The owner of the car assaulted someone without any reason and caused injury to the person. shall bear the corresponding legal responsibility.

I think the Audi owner's approach is really very excessive, and it is very illegal, it is a very clear transactional relationship, as long as you choose, you should pay, no matter what status you have, what status.

I think the owner of the Audi should be punished in accordance with the law, and beating others has endangered personal safety, and must be punished, so that the public can see the consequences of violating the law.

It can only be said that this is a very bad behavior, since you should pay for the substitute driver, and also insult and beat the substitute driver, the substitute driver is also very hard. Such behavior is undoubtedly very bad.

Although the family background of the Audi owner may be much better than that of the substitute driver, he cannot bully people just because he has money.

I think this incident is very bad. The impact is also very bad, as a consumer, to do such a thing.

The man who is the substitute driver can call the police, and the Audi owner has already constituted the crime of injury by beating the substitute driver, and since the parents have completed it, they should pay a certain fee, and they should also defend their rights through the consumer association.

The man who drives on behalf of the driver can keep the corresponding evidence, and then defend his rights in the form of law, if not, through a lawsuit.

The man who drives on behalf of him should use the right means to protect his rights, and he can use the law to protect his legitimate rights and interests, and he should also get back the fees he deserves.

If the man who is driving on behalf of him wants to defend his rights, he can collect evidence and submit it to the people's court, which will give a fair verdict.

Seek legal help, the owner of the car has been suspected of intentional injury and should be held criminally responsible, and the man who is the driver can also recover civil liability from him for damages. The other two can negotiate compensation privately.

All men should take legal measures to protect their rights and interests, and should immediately report to the police and recover their losses from the owner of the Audi.

The man who is the substitute driver can go and sue the car owner. Because the owner of the car promised to give the money, but repented, this behavior is wrong.

I think this man should collect relevant evidence and use the law to protect his legitimate rights and interests.

I think everyone should go to the police to deal with it or find a consumer right, but it is best to call the police to deal with it, after all, such an act has really hurt their personal safety, and it is more appropriate to call the police.

The follow-up cost of driving on behalf of the car is more than 13,000 yuan, and he feels that he is losing, so he naturally wants to ask the owner of the Audi for compensation.

1. The owner of the Audi felt that the 260 yuan driving fee was too expensive, and beat and abused the driver. The Audi owner drank too much that day, so he called a substitute driverThe two parties negotiated a driving fee of 260 yuan。But when he arrived at the destination, the Audi owner drank too much or what's wrong, he was not willing to pay, and he also attacked the substitute driver, the key is to beat the substitute driver.

The substitute driver then called the police, and under the coordination of **, the two parties reached a civil agreementAudi owners pay 13,000 yuan at a time, this matter is over.

But the Audi owner didn't expect that the driver would send him a messageAsk for 40,000 yuan in compensation, otherwise this matter will not be over, Audi owners are waiting to go to jail.

Second, the substitute driver regretted signing the settlement letter and prepared to appeal. Let's start with it, if the truth is as the driver said,Then the Audi owner is definitely responsible。And the substitute driver got **, there was also a police report on the same day, and there were medical records, here, he couldn't get any benefits, and he wouldn't accept it again, after all, the settlement was signedIf everyone did this, they wouldn't be exhausted.

Besides, the substitute driver should understand the law, know what he should do, and understand that he wants to get justice for himselfThe only way is to go through the legal route. And the owner of the Audi also said that if he goes to court, he will go to court, and he will do whatever the court decides, so who is doing thingsIt's hard to say for the time being, just wait for the follow-up.

And don't blindly accuse the owner of Audi, he did something wrong beforeHowever, he has apologized and compensated the medical expenses of the substitute driver。If this is said, it will not be justified, people will always make mistakes, and they can change their mistakes. After all, what the situation was at that time, it seemed that both sides were reasonable.

III. Finally. I'm actually more curious, the driver will call the police, even if the community threatens you againDidn't you call the police? Why not ask them for help?

Instead, they signed a settlement under their threatsIsn't that weird?

Because the substitute driver went to the hospital for an examination and found that the injury was more serious than he imagined, and he couldn't work for a period of time, he claimed 40,000 yuan.

Because he felt that he had lost again, he would ask for the amount again, thinking that the Audi owner was at a loss, and guessed that he would definitely be responsible for his actions and pay the amount at the same time.

In fact, it is because the driver's injury has further deteriorated later, so he will continue to claim compensation for medical expenses.

The Audi owner did do such a thing, and the behavior he did can be described as very bad. At present, ** has come forward to mediate, and the two parties have reached relevant agreements. The owner of this Audi first hired a substitute driver and asked the substitute driver to drive for him.

Unexpectedly, when he asked the substitute driver to drive, because he himself was drunk, he didn't pay everyone directly, and he also beat the other party, causing the other party's nose bone fracture. It is a very aggrieved thing for this substitute driver, and the attitude of this Audi owner is also very arrogant.

He directly claimed that the life of the substitute driver was not as valuable as his car. Everyone's life is equal, and when it comes to dealing with some things, we should treat them equally. The owner of this Audi should be punished for directly beating others, causing injuries to others.

The substitute driver did nothing wrong with what he did, and he also delivered the employer to the destination safely, and the fare he asked for was reasonable.

However, the employer did not pay the money, which has affected the substitute driver。Because his employer was drinking, some of his actions were paralyzed by alcohol. After this happened, the employer also claimed that it was because the asking price was too high that he refused to pay.

But the driver said that he had walked so many distances, and it was exactly 260, so he did not overcharge. From this point of view, it must be the responsibility of the employer. No matter how you can't hurt others, you should compensate the substitute driver.

After the two parties coordinated, the employer directly paid more than 10,000 yuan to compensate.

However, the driver said that the expenses might not be enough for him to go for medical treatment, so he asked his employer for it. The employer said that he had already made all the claims and would not give the corresponding money. I hope that when employers hire drivers, they must not beat up substitute drivers like this employer.

This has caused damage to his life, and he must be compensated.

No, because both of them are at fault with each other, not on the part of the Audi owner.

It's unclear what happened that night, as the two of them had their own opinions, but it is certain that the Audi owner did say that the other's life was not as valuable as his own car, and that he did beat the other.

Since I called the substitute driver, I think the owner should have drunk, some people are really bad at drinking, he can be very rich, and the quality is not necessarily good.

He received the task of driving on behalf of him, and drove more than 30 kilometers from Tianhe District of Guangzhou to Baiyun District. At that time, the era of driving did not take the software platform, but directly took orders on the roadside. But it is also calculated according to the normal **, the starting price of the night order is 85 yuan, about 3 yuan per kilometer, and the total charge is 260 yuan, but Mr. Zhan does not admit it, saying that it is impossible to drive for so long for a distance of more than 10 kilometers, and the contradiction arises in this way.

The cause of this incident was that the two parties had a disagreement over the cost, and the owner felt that the substitute driver was slandering, so he refused to pay the fare. Because he had drunk, his words were more intense, and there was a physical altercation.

The truth is that the substitute driver did have the behavior of Ti**, and the Audi driver did beat each other, and the two signed a settlement letter afterwards, and the Audi driver compensated for the loss, and the driver felt that the money was less and asked the Audi driver for more than 100,000 compensation, I think both parties are responsible for this matter.

It was because the Audi driver felt that the cost of the substitute driver was too high, so the two sides argued, and the Audi driver took action.

This is a recent incident in Baiyun District, Guangzhou, when an Audi owner and his friends were unable to drive and find a substitute driver after drinking, it is said that the Audi owner did not pay because he said that it was too expensive, and he and four friends abused and beat the substitute driver. I think there are three reasons why he dares to be so arrogant, first of all, the Audi owner wants to bargain, so he refuses to bear so much cost for driving. Secondly, because I drank alcohol, my words and deeds were not properly controlled.

In the end, he was an Audi owner with money, and he also had companions.

First, the owner of the Audi wants to bargain, so he refuses to bear so much cost of driving.

The owner of the Audi may be from a businessman's background, and the nature of the business is to like to bargain. There are reports on the Internet that the driver of the era asked for 400 yuan, but many people think that the cost is more than 200 yuan is reasonable. So it may be that the Audi owner refused to pay after he made a request of more than 400 yuan, not the final negotiated 260 yuan.

And the substitute driver himself also said that most drinkers are very willing to find a substitute driver, and it doesn't matter if the cost is high, but I didn't expect to encounter a tangled.

Second, because he drank alcohol, his words and deeds were not properly controlled.

People say that wine is a bold thing, Audi owners are fluttering after drinking, talking and doing things must not be in place, big words, bragging, scolding, I think it is possible to be true. Even if he finally sobered up and felt that he didn't curse at that time, in fact, he may have done some bad words and deeds at that time.

Third, he is an Audi owner, rich and has companions.

Audi owners do have a little bit of net worth, and they naturally feel that they are worth a lot of money in front of the substitute driver, not to mention that they have a good circle, so they casually call four people to help and beat the substitute driver with him.

I think people are equal occupations, and occupations are also equal, it is not easy for everyone to go out, I earn my driving fee, you sit in your car, why do you have a dispute?

It's all about money. People who drive Audi cars are generally financially powerful people, and because these people have a better economy, they have no fear, often look at no one, and trample on the personality of others at will.

Because the owner of the Audi thinks that he is more arrogant because he is rich, and he drinks some alcohol, he behaves irrationally.

His character is like this, either he is used to being arrogant and feels that he is not afraid of heaven and earth, or he has money and confidence in his family.

The main reason is that the owner of the car thinks that the fare is expensive and wants to bargain, plus he has drunk and behaves very impulsively, and he and his friends do not respect ordinary laborers very much, so there is a conflict.

Judging from the currently known information, the fault of the car owner for playing drunk is a little greater, after all, they all beat the other party's nose crookedly. The party who made the first move in a similar dispute must be at fault, and according to the substitute driver, he did not fight back at that time, which is equivalent to the car owner being held responsible for it when he was unilaterally beaten.

1. The owner of the Audi beat the substitute driver after drinking and said wildly: The car is more expensive than your life, and people often say that it is easy to make mistakes after drinking, and the owner of the car in this case clashed with the substitute driver because of drunkenness, which led to things going in an uncontrollable direction. According to this case, the reason for the dispute between the two parties is the driving fee of 260 yuan, the journey of more than 30 kilometers from Tianhe District to Baiyun District in Guangzhou, or the order generated at more than two o'clock in the morning.

However, the Audi owner thought that this ** was unreasonable in a drunken state, and began to play drunk with the mentality of unwilling to pay, and finally developed into a physical conflict, and the substitute driver was beaten by several friends of the other party until his face was covered with blood. Later, after the arrival of the police, the two parties mediated, and the substitute driver, accompanied by a friend of the other party, went to the hospital for examination, and then the two parties signed a settlement letter at the police station.

In fact, the controversy of the incident at present is that the substitute driver repented after signing the settlement letter and getting the 13,000 yuan compensation given by the other party, because when he returned to the hospital for examination, he found that his nose needed to be repaired later, and this expense was completely insufficient to rely on this 13,000 yuan, which made him dissatisfied with the mediation result, and said that he signed the agreement when he was not very sober.

However, after all, this mediation letter was signed by himself, and even if it was signed when his mind was not clear, as he said, it still has certain legal benefits