Why did Yang Kun diss Thunder ?

Because Yang Kun said that this song is not a real song. It's just a rap genre, so it's going to be more disgusting.

Because he wants to rely on "Thunder" to gain a wave of attention and rub the popularity of the song "Thunder".

Because Yang Kun is a powerful singer, he feels that this song is actually not very good, and he does not have the strength to become a pop song.

Recently, the song "Thunder" has become very popular, many netizens are listening to it, many people have covered this song, and various versions have been circulated on the Internet. But not long ago, singer Yang Kun publicly diss "Thunder" in the live broadcast room, which attracted the attention of the majority of netizens, and this matter also caused a stir on the Internet. Yang Kun is a very strong singer, and "Thunder" is a song called Mai Divine Comedy, many people are wondering why Yang Kun diss "Thunder"?

What is the original song of "Thunder" called?

The song "Thunder" became popular through Douyin short **, the original song is "MC Liudao", this song is not an ordinary fire on the Internet during this time. But after singer Yang Kun listened to the song "Thunder", he directly diss "Thunder" in the live broadcast room. Yang Kun said:

If you want a song without a song, you want a melody without a melody", and finally said ruthlessly that netizens who like "Thunder" should not enter his live broadcast room.

This matter quickly spread on the Internet, and netizens discussed this matter, and the original singer of "Thunder" MC Liudao also responded in the live broadcast room, saying, "**Regardless of high and low, existence is reasonable, and what can bring happiness to everyone is good**." MC Liudao refused to admit defeat, and finally said: ""Thunder" is more popular than any of your songs!

The song "Thunder" is indeed very popular, but the response of the original singer MC Liudao makes many people feel a little arrogant, after all, good ** can withstand the baptism of time, this song is indeed very popular now, but whether it can continue to be popular, no one can see through it. Later, Yang Kun specially recorded ** in response to the original song of "Thunder", saying that he liked both garlic and coffee, and hinted that "Thunder" was really unacceptable.

Regarding the song "Thunder", music critics believe that the popularity of this kind of song also means that the threshold is lowered. At present, this matter is still very hot on the Internet, and Yang Kun and the original singer of "Thunder" have a dispute, and everyone has different opinions. Some people think that what Yang Kun said is right, but there are also many people who choose to support MC Liudao, what do you think about this?

I stand Yang Kun. What Yang Kun said was very reasonable, and the reply of the original song of Thunder was too conceited and arrogant.

The cause of the matter is:

During Yang Kun's live broadcast, there were many people who asked him to sing thunder.

Isn't this an insult to the professionals?

Next, there will definitely be a bar essence to ask, "Then Yang Kun can't just refuse and not sing?" Do you have to use such an excessive way to belittle other people's work? ”…As we all know, culture is diverse, but culture should also take its best and remove its dross.

Garbage is garbage, and it will not be noble because it is highly sung, but should be eliminated.

So I think that Yang Kun's attitude and way are completely fine. He shouldn't fool the past, he just has to take a stand in the dark! A good culture should be guided by the right direction!

If he doesn't express his position this time, then next time, next time, next time, next time, there will still be people who make such unreasonable demands. Cutting off the dross at the root is a good attitude.

Finally, for the original song of Thunder, "Thunder is more popular than any song of Yang Kun", "There is no difference between high and low", this kind of unlevel words....When I saw it, I thought:

Every art form, there is no right or wrong, as long as there are people who like it, it has the value of existence.

Maybe everyone is an ordinary person, the so-called layman, and he has not received any higher education. I can't afford to play anything elegant, and I can't afford to play any art. As far as ** is concerned, the so-called palace-level **, the so-called blues, the so-called blues, for ordinary people, they can't hear any ducks and chickens, anyway, listen to what mentors, what **people, talk about this and that, you say good, the people will follow and say good, you say no, the people will follow and say no, after all, these elegant ** are really far from the lives of the people.

It's really not as good as some parks, the so-called Internet celebrities hum those throats, after all, they are around, right in front of them, they can be seen and touched, and they are more practical.

This is not just an accidental incident, but a mutual incomprehension caused by the clash of urban and rural cultures, and a cultural confrontation caused by the circle culture.

Before discussing the rights and wrongs of Yang Kun's words, the first thing we should think about is, why do some people like to shout microphones?

In fact, when I first listened to "One Drunk Person", I was also confused, there was no melody, no rhythm to speak of, and the lyrics were pompous and empty. In terms of sexuality, it is not as good as our traditional opera Allegro Rat Treasure, and the literary nature of the lyrics is even more 108,000 miles away from Allegro. Although they are all in the form of a smooth mouth, Allegro Mouse Noble will mostly present you with complete story passages, which is comparable to folklore.

In the matter of Yang Kun diss "Thunder", if you look at it from the perspective of a "Thunder" fan, no matter who you are, the king of heaven Lao Tzu will diss, and Lao Tzu will also give you back. Therefore, these anchor circles, which are mainly composed of rural youth, naturally intensify the cultural confrontation between urban and rural areas. This is not just an accidental incident, but a mutual incomprehension caused by the clash of urban and rural cultures, and a cultural confrontation caused by the circle culture.

This kind of conflict will persist with urbanization for a long time, and it may be far more effective for everyone who eats melons to exercise restraint, give enough cultural tolerance, and use the power of culture to inspire opponents than diss.

I'm sorry, I'm going to be politically incorrect once today, and I still feel that there is a high and low.

There is no comparison between the different genres, let's not talk about it, the same is a pop song:

That "Can't Hurt" sings "There are a lot of hot girls in your Weibo......After the affection, they will not come to me ......"Can't you tell the difference between high and low when you sing "Over the hills, only to find that no one is waiting, chattering, and the sorrow that I don't give at any time"?

Isn't it good to sing "I still want to do it with you, I want to do it with you" and "On the shore of Lake Baikal" to sing "The moonlight sprinkles love all over the lake, and the bonfire of two people illuminates the whole night"?

**No matter how high or low? Then why is the world's admired ** master Beethoven, Mozart, Chopin and not MC Tianyou and You Six Paths?

There are a bunch of such examples, and others talk to you politely and politely, and talk about political correctness to you, regardless of whether you are high or low, and you really believe it, don't you?

If anyone tells you anything in the future, no matter how high or low, it is purely funny, mud go pee, how can shoddy things be compared with the works created by others? Touch your face and ask if you are a match?

I don't think shouting microphone is a form of **, it has not stepped into the threshold or circle, and no one wants this threshold to be flattened, whether for the audience or the creator. Once this threshold is leveled to the point where chanting limericks can be popular, I think it's very sad.

Now there are too many shoddy songs, the production cost is low, anyone can be a ** person, this is not a manifestation of the popularization of art, what we mean by popularization refers to the spread of good things, not to create a random thing, I think it is very good, both as a referee and as an athlete.

MC Liudao said: The ** that gives people happiness ** is good**. I wonder why something is wrong.

Just like the "pale yellow long skirt and fluffy hair" that was red a few days ago, of course I feel happy, but I won't associate it with good **. If you take "giving people happiness" as the standard for doing **, then it is likely that everyone will treat your ** as a joke.

There is almost no creative threshold for shouting, it is easy to be said, note that it is "speaking" rather than "singing", it is more like a strange branch of traditional Chinese allegro or two-person turn. Compared with rap, it doesn't have a tune, it sounds a little hot, just rhymes, but it's not on the tune, and the ** with it is a bit like hard bass, with a heavy bass split head and face, it seems to be trying to cover up the fact that it is out of tune with "dong times".

Secondly, as for the "existence is reasonable" mentioned by MC Liudao, everyone knows that this sentence is what Hegel said, but the original sentence of this sentence is: everything that is rational is realistic, and everything that is realistic is rational. There is also a premise for existence, not to say "I am Zhang San, I exist to set fire to steal, existence is reasonable, I am reasonable", Mr. Luo Xiang wanted to beat people after hearing this.

So Hegel's statement is not to justify the existence of all things, and I don't think shouting is rational and should be promoted.

Once another big star who shouted microphone Tianyou said wildly in a certain program in Zeng: "With shouting microphone, with my current popularity, it is only a matter of time before I become a big star", this kind of childish madness and arrogance is very similar to today's floating shouting microphones. Tianyou's live broadcast room has driven a lot of bad values, such as his "Skating Divine Comedy", which is suspected of instigating people to take drugs, which has broken through the bottom line and brought a very serious social impact.

Whether it is hype or not, Yang Kun speaks very directly many times, or it is also an objective fact that it is very unpleasant. Another fact is that MC Liudao is also a knife mouth who can't stand grievances. Both of them dare to be intimidating because of their achievements and positions, and they speak inflated and mercilessly.

Therefore, the matter of rubbing traffic is also a matter created by both parties and benefited by both parties.

ConclusionThis matter is completely different from the Naying Daolang incident, not because Yangchun Baixue looks down on the class antagonism of the Xiariba people, but because of the comprehensive reasons such as level, expression, flow, income channels, and era thinking. From a social point of view, this kind of reply to authority is a good phenomenon worthy of encouragement.

However, for the **cultural phenomenon of shouting microphones, as well as for the self-awareness of **creators, although there are many people who just like this kind of song, only when the ** sex is really improved can the doubters shut up.

I think it's because of the downturn in the overall Chinese music scene that this online singer dares to openly provoke Yang Kun. If the Chinese music scene goes back 20 years, I want to ask if this singer is really embarrassed to call his work **?

20 years ago, the Chinese music scene was full of ups and downs, and there were many talents. A large number of powerful singers have emerged, and the singers at that time produced a song, with lyrics, composition and arrangement. Every song is carefully polished before it is released to the market.

And facts have proved that only such songs can withstand the test of time and become classics.

And now, a casual and shoddy Shulaibao can't even be called Shulaibao, because the lyrics basically have no meaning, and Shulaibao also has to be narrative, and he dares to call it more popular than any of Yang Kun's songs. That's right, I admit that this song is really popular because I usually hum two lines because of its catchiness and Internet dissemination. But although I can hum, I definitely don't recognize this kind of work as **.

Maybe you are more popular than Yang Kun's works, but the two of you are not playing the same thing at all.

Here, I unequivocally support Yang Kun.

In fact, Yang Kun diss "Thunder" is considered from a professional and first-class point of view. Indeed, thunder is to shout mai (I don't have any opinion on this, it's very rhythmic and rhyming, catchy and easy to remember. Therefore, it is relatively easy to spread and be known to the public.

However, without the thunder of the lyrics, there is actually no rhyme, and there is no ** rhythmic beauty. Personally, I think Yang Kun really watched it when he was thundering. So it's "non-technical".

On the other hand, I remember that the original creator of Thunder also responded to Yang Kun. As far as mass culture is concerned, it is necessary to create a mass culture that is well liked by the broad masses of the people. The thunderous fire is also obvious to everyone, everyone likes it very much, and they also adapt or imitate it.

But if you want to be comparable to a professional ** person like Yang Kun, I'm afraid it is still much inferior.

Therefore, whether it is Yang Kun or thunder, each has its own characteristics. I hope that people from all walks of life can develop, create and develop in their own fields, and make their things not only "technical," but also enjoyable. Only then will our whole society progress and culture prosper.

I think what he said is right, because we really can't rule out that it is now a pluralistic society, and it is indeed a society where anything can appear, because society is very inclusive, so we allow all kinds of **, not only in ** this aspect, but also in many other aspects, that is, we may have some things that may not have been available before, this may be good, but I think in the eyes of professional **people, this really can't be a **, because it is a vulgar fashion feeling, If professional ** people, they appreciate ** in order to cultivate sentiment, express feelings, or to give people a very relaxed and pleasant, or a different style, this kind of they have this kind of pursuit of Hua, they may feel that songs like thunder may be insulting these two words, and I think simply shouting microphone is**? I don't think this is true, and many people have said that they don't like this. I think**There is also a classification, so what is noble**, what is niche**, or what is not on the table**, this is indeed differentiated, we can't stop, some people like this kind of **, but we have to be able to distinguish what is good**, what is bad**?

We still have to have this discernment.