Spring Airlines refuses to board depressed female students! Is it discrimination against patients or

Spring Airlines' approach was to maintain the safety of other passengers, because the female passenger was obviously in a bad mood at the time of check-in, so Spring Airlines' approach was also a last resort.

It is to maintain safety, after all, if a depressed schoolgirl gets sick on the plane, it will affect safety.

Maintain security. If a female student is depressed and emotionally unstable during the flight, there will be a safety hazard and the safety of other passengers will be endangered.

Yes, passengers should not be denied boarding even if they are depressed, they have the right to fly.

I think it is discrimination, and doing so will increase the psychological burden of depressed patients, causing an impact, we should be tolerant and caring for depressed patients, and not limit their permissions because of this.

I don't think it's a form of discrimination, but a kind of protection for people with depression, because people with depression are likely to do things that hurt themselves for outside reasons.

The airline responded afterwards that the passengers were more emotional and did not know the case, and refused to board the passengers for the sake of the safety of the passengers themselves and all passengers. This is discrimination against people who are sick, not just people with depression.

It's not discrimination. Spring Airlines staff reassured the patient, but after repeated attempts, the patient was still emotionally unstable. For the safety of the patient, he was refused to register and was advised to take the high-speed rail.

I think it's a kind of discrimination, and I'm worried that if something bad happens to a depressed person on the plane, it will only add a lot of trouble in the future.

I think it's disrespectful to people with depression, they're just sick, they're not monsters, why keep them out? You can let family members accompany you on board, and flight attendants can pay more attention to them, rather than being vigilant everywhere.

Spring Airlines' response to the denied boarding of depressed patients is not discrimination against depressed patients, but out of safety considerations and to ensure the protection of other passengers.

Spring Airlines' refusal to carry female depressed patients is certainly inappropriate, and anything that involves discrimination is inappropriate and should not exist. The refusal to carry itself should not exist, whether it is any disease, physical disease, mental illness, it should be treated equally.

For patients with depression, being willing to go out of the house and take a plane is a rare thing in itself, which means that she is also actively helping herself and does not want to be troubled by depression. I finally took a brave step, but I was stopped directly outside the plane, which obviously caused a great shadow on the psychology of depressed patients. Depressed patients are full of pessimism about the world, thinking that they are not needed and loved, and now even airlines treat them differently, and depressed patients are likely to get worse because of this!

The responsibility of the airline is that depression is a mental illness, but the patient himself will be affected, and there is no threat to others, and the airline does not have any right to prevent passengers from boarding. Even if the other person has heart disease, diabetes, high blood pressure, etc., they can fly, so why can't they take a plane if they are depressed? If the airline's refusal to board causes a safety accident or accident to the passenger, Spring Airlines is inescapable of liking.

The harm of depression is due to the great pressure of young people now, more and more people suffer from mental illness, mental illness itself is not terrible, as long as you still need the warmth of the people around you, I didn't expect that even airlines are now exuding such malice, showing unfairness and discrimination against patients with mental illness, which will aggravate the patient's rejection and fear of the external environment, and will definitely aggravate the condition. Moreover, after severe depression, patients themselves have a tendency to self-harm, so it is actually quite dangerous to say that the airline is actually quite dangerous, whether it is morally or safely, it is inappropriate.

Suitable. If an airline considers that it will affect flight safety, it may refuse to carry a passenger, so it is appropriate for Spring Airlines to do so.

Personally, I don't think it's a good fit! In fact, suffering from depression is already a painful thing, so they should not be treated unfairly.

It is understandable if a person has heart disease or other problems that are not suitable for flying, but depression does not constitute a condition for not being able to board a plane, so it is not suitable.

I don't think it's appropriate to say it so clearly, it feels like there is a clear prejudice against people with depression, and we should care more about this vulnerable group.

This is not appropriate, even if you suffer from depression, you still have human rights, you should be respected, and you should not be deprived of your legal rights because of the disease, which is not right.

This is not true because there is no law that says that patients with depression cannot fly, and I hope that this airline will respond correctly.

It is not appropriate to refuse to carry a female depressed patient, under normal circumstances, a depressed patient will not cause harm to other people, and the refusal to carry a patient is a very unreasonable behavior, and there is nothing in the law.

It is not suitable, the soul of depressed patients is very fragile, we cannot discriminate against them, maybe our unintentional actions will cause them to fall into the abyss.

There are different views from different angles. From the point of view of the aviation side, it is appropriate. The refusal of boarding is to avoid the possibility that the patient may pose a threat to the safety of those on board.

At that time, the staff at the ground service found that the passenger's hands were shaking seriously in the course of the case, so they asked the passenger's past medical history and boarding status, and the staff at that time also comforted the passenger. It's just that the passengers' emotions are more excited, and the passengers' own hands are shaking all the time, and they are even shouting at the boarding gate. It directly caused complaints from the surrounding passengers, so the staff at that time did not let the passenger board the plane.

When Mr. Yu and his girlfriend were preparing to board the plane at the airport, because his girlfriend suffered from depression and because of the drug, he was trembling. Later, at the airport, I met the airport security personnel and staff, who came up to inquire about the trembling hands. And Mr. Yu said that his girlfriend would not have trembling hands without taking medicine.

So after not being able to board the plane, Mr. Yu had to take his girlfriend to Nanjing by high-speed train, and his girlfriend's current condition is not good, her mood is not very good, and she even has suicidal tendencies, and Mr. Yu has complained to Spring Airlines. Spring Airlines and Mr. Yu have their own opinions on this matter, and Spring Airlines also clearly stipulates that special groups of people need to provide relevant certificates before boarding.

And Mr. Yu's girlfriend was taking drugs at the time, so this situation happened. But after taking the drug, Mr. Yu's girlfriend will have some adverse reactions, and even her mood is relatively low. Therefore, the girlfriend at this time is actually not suitable for boarding.

And people with depression are inherently very sensitive, sensitive to everything in the outside world. Therefore, for Mr. Yu, even if the staff is asking, then he should try to avoid his girlfriend, instead of letting the staff say it in front of his girlfriend, which will lead to cranky thinking in depressed patients, and even make his girlfriend fall into deeper self-blame in the end.

Aviation response "the condition is unknown, safety considerations to dissuade passengers", I am on the side of aviation, the plane is a special means of transportation, and belongs to a closed environment, whether it is the woman's depression affects other passengers, or does not affect passengers, both ends can not get the first time medical assistance in a short time, after take-off the plane accident is a whole plane thing! In the end, the high-speed rail that the woman sit, compared with the airplane, the emergency stop of the high-speed rail has less impact on the tourists on the entire line, and the hospital assistance is more convenient.

The staff said that they asked the person about his condition at that time and comforted the person. I think the staff did the right thing, what if something happens to you on the plane?

The staff responded that the airline was acting in accordance with the regulations, and it was true that the airline had the right to refuse boarding when the passenger had a mental illness, but the airline's approach could be more tactful.

At the beginning, the woman's hands were shaking, which triggered inquiries from airport personnel, and then the man truthfully said that he was depressed, and the woman was also shouting loudly at the boarding gate, probably for safety reasons, and the people next to her expressed concern. The airport staff refused the woman's ride.

And the destination is the hospital that I want to go to, but because of depression, I changed my plane again, and it may aggravate my condition, which has to be said to be a very sad situation. That's why the boyfriend of the person concerned will complain.

But personally, I don't think the airlines did anything wrong. After all, the safety of most people is more important, and if the woman is emotionally normal, maybe this matter will be over. But I also know that patients can't control their emotions, so although the current way of dealing with it is not the best, it is also the most impossible to deal with it properly.

Although this is very unreasonable, the situation of the parties is not too optimistic, and it is not certain what will happen after getting on the plane. It may be that the parties are not prepared for this, and if they get on the plane, there may be a bad situation, and in the end, the consequences are not required from the perspective of the parties, but they may not be able to bear it from the perspective of the airline.

After all, airlines are not only responsible for the parties, but also for the passengers who fly with them. As a passenger's point of view, if the lady did something, she was still in the air and had no way to save herself, she must be very worried about herself. So, in this regard, the airline still guarantees the safety of most people.

And the parties did not think clearly, whether they should choose a safe vehicle from the beginning without such a great risk. Is it possible to choose to rent a car, or a train or other means of transportation, so that you can also face emergencies without endangering the health of others too much?

However, after reading the description of the person concerned, the attitude of the airline personnel in handling things is indeed not so good, and the man may also have concealed his illness, so he can only say, let the bullets fly for a while.

Both sides have their own opinions on this matter, and if, as Spring Airlines said, the woman was not fit to fly when she boarded the plane, there is nothing wrong with that. Because if the lady is unwell on the plane, it is very difficult to seek medical attention.

Spring Airlines also acts in accordance with the regulations, but in the process of negotiation between the two parties, Spring Airlines' attitude can be better. I think the refusal of a depressed patient will cause a lot of people to be angry, and I hope that Spring Airlines will apologize in the future.

Spring Airlines' refusal to board is also in accordance with the airline's regulations and for the safety of other passengers.

This is actually very resentful, because the airline treats people differently.

The depressed patient was denied boarding, Spring Airlines responded, but netizens quarreled.

Yes, it is difficult for patients with depression to have any behaviors because of mental illness, and if they get sick during the flight, it is very serious to endanger flight safety.

No, there is no proof that depressed patients cannot fly, and no other airline has refused to take it, and depressed patients are also eligible to take airlines like ordinary citizens, and the airline is not qualified to refuse to carry depressed patients.

It is true that it is for the safety of others, because according to the Air Traffic Control Act, these patients are not allowed to fly, and flying is not only a danger to themselves, but also to other passengers.