How to identify the authenticity of relics? Do relics really exist

You can knock it with an iron hammer, and the iron hammer can knock it out, and the relics and relics are as if they are not moving, that is true.

Hello dear dear, it is a pleasure to serve you: the relics really exist It can be said that the existence of the relics is true, and the reason why the relics are doubtful is because many people regard them as "legends", in fact, the relics are obtained by monks through a lifetime of self-practice. Buddhism also emphasizes that the acquisition of relics is related to the monks' own practice, and the amorphous shape of the relics also confirms the truth of "impermanence" in Buddhism, while some masters and monks say that relics are a combination of flesh and bones.

I wish you a happy life! Hope mine is helpful to you ha.

Identification method of authenticity of relics: The real relics can be knocked with an iron hammer, and the iron hammer can knock the concave relics, and the relics are as if they do not move, which is true.

The relics are crystals produced after cremation of the hair and bones left behind by Buddhist monks after their deaths, also known as strong seeds. The shape of the relics is ever-changing, and the colors are also different, some are like pearls, some are like agate, and crystal. Buddhism believes that it is only a material element and has no supernatural components, and that Buddhists revere and worship relics mainly because of the merits and compassionate wisdom of the monks during their lifetimes.

To break the mysterious aura of the relic, first find out when and who is the closest relic?

It's a pity that I can't find any information on the Internet, and I can't find any information about this, but I can't say that there are a few places in a few temples and pagodas, and ordinary visitors may not have to see it, they are all legends that can't be verified for a long time. Or is the true essence of Buddhism lost? It seems to be a bit of a slap in the face, just like the ancient stories of other sects and sects, which cannot be reproduced, cannot be reproduced, and the focus is on the story rather than on the relics themselves, and the emphasis is on belief rather than fulfillment, and it may not have taken more time to do this research.

It is said that there are only two relics in our country now, if this is the case, the relics are absolutely not necessarily related to the Buddha or not, and the monks are not necessarily related, and it is completely produced by some accidental factors, and may have nothing to do with the flesh and bones of the human body, and if the two are true, according to the current respect for the status of cultural relics for Buddhism, research experiments must not be done, and they can only let their own guesses and inferences, and naturally they cannot really figure out the composition and causes of the relics.

As for the saying that Shakyamuni was cremated and his whole body was relics, it was 100% a Buddhist apocryphal legend, just like the stories made up by various sects such as Taijiquan for their respective ancestors.

Summary. It is rumored that the real existence of Shakyamuni's relics has indeed been reported, but not every one of them is true. But in any case, they have a sacred status for devout Buddhists and are considered to be treasures left behind by the Buddha after he experienced purification.

It is rumored that the real existence of Shakyamuni's relics has indeed been reported, but not every one of them is true. But in any case, they have a sacred status for devout Buddhists and are considered to be treasures left behind by the Buddha after he experienced purification.

Yes, a relic is a treasure that is considered in Buddhism to be proof of full attainment. Relics come in different shapes, such as fisheye-shaped, spherical, fan-shaped, pear-shaped, apple-shaped, etc., and generally have different colors, including black, white, yellow, purple, etc.