Which is better, AMD X4 Athlon 750K or Phenom 955?

Athlon 750k is slightly better than Acelong 955 after overclocking, and the power consumption is much better than 955, and now the two are similar, buy new and not buy old, it is recommended to choose Athlon 750k

If you still have any questions, please feel free to ask, and DIY Corps will sincerely answer them for you

Hello, in terms of comprehensive performance. Naturally 955 strong, although 955 is an outdated architecture, but 955 has two floating point units and 6MB L3, overclocking performance, 750k is slightly stronger than 955, neither is considered a multiplier, in addition, I want to correct a mistake upstairs, 955 also has a 95w version, so not all 955 power consumption is stronger than 955, I recommend you buy 955, hope.

The performance of the two is comparable, but the 750K has a lower TDP power consumption, with the 750K TDP consuming 100W and the 955 having 125W.

This section describes the parameters of the two:

AMD Athlon™ II X4 750K Specs:

Applicable Type: Desktop;

CPU series: Athlon II X4;

CPU Frequency: ;

Dynamic overclocking maximum frequency: 4GHz;

Slot Type: Socket FM2;

L2 cache: 4MB;

Number of cores: 4 cores;

Thermal Design Power (TDP): 100W.

AMD Phenom II X4 955 Specs:

Applicable Type: Desktop;

CPU series: Phenom II X4;

CPU Frequency: ;

Socket Type: Socket AM3;

Number of pins: 938pin;

Number of cores: 4 cores;

Thermal Design Power Consumption (TDP): 125W.

Since the AMD 860K processor uses the new socket type of socket FM2+, we need to use a motherboard with a socket FM2+ socket interface.

A55, A75, and A85 motherboards that were previously compatible with AMD 760K processors will not be compatible with AMD 860K processors in the future due to the FM2 processor socket, unless the motherboard manufacturer upgrades and improves them. Currently, the only motherboard that can be compatible with AMD 860K processors is the A88 motherboard, and a large number of A88 motherboards have been listed before, so the AMD 860K is suitable for the A88 motherboard.

Since AMD Athlon II X4 860K is a quad-core processor with mainstream performance, in terms of balance, it is suitable for matching mid-range mainstream discrete graphics cards, this year's mid-range mainstream graphics cards mainly include R7-260X and GTX750 graphics cards, so if you want to balance and pay attention to game performance, R7-260X and GTX750 graphics cards (price is around 800 yuan) are good choices.

The Athlonx X4 860 is equivalent to the i3.

AMD's new entry-level quad-core CPU is quite cost-effective, and the performance is on par with the third-generation i3.

Cost-effective, high-frequency, non-locked! It's enough for me to only use the silent frequency! It's basically dual-core in daily life.,Two slow and four-core still have to watch the game!

It's not bad overall.,The temperature is not as high as I imagined.,I used Xuanbing S40 to suppress it.,Room temperature is about 15 degrees.,Standby is about 23 degrees.,Daily use is about 31.,The game is below 50 degrees!

Low Power Consumption:

The more cores there are, the more power consumption is true. First of all, quad-core processors need to integrate a larger number of transistors, and the total number of Prescott core transistors made of traditional 90nm is 125 million.

The latest Woodcrest dual-core processor transistor scale will exceed 300 million, obviously the traditional 90nm manufacturing is not enough to meet the number of transistors required for the quad-core, so Intel's new generation of quad-core processors must be produced with 65nm manufacturing.

In addition, the leakage current of processors using 90nm process is serious, which directly leads to the high power consumption of the processor, and the so-called leakage current refers to the flow of current regardless of whether the transistor is on or off (switching). In order to reduce the loss of current, it is necessary to increase the electron mobility.

The AMD Athlon™ 750K is equivalent to the i3.

Friend's configuration, high energy consumption, low efficiency, after overclocking, 750K is indeed much better than i3-3220, but AMD's 100W, Intel's 55W, graphics card, your HD6770 directly blows up HD6570, memory your 8G, if it's not a 64-bit system, I say it's a waste of money. Finally, if you read it right, your friend is from the computer city, and those things are really profitable.

Desktop Athlon:

Delivering leading performance for software today and tomorrowThe AMD Athlon-64 processor gives you confidence in the device with an innovative design and support for next-generation AMD 64 software to meet the computing needs of today and tomorrow.

AMD Athlon-64 Processor for PC Replacement LaptopsThe most advanced PC processor for notebook computing.

The AMD Athlon-64 processor delivers outstanding performance for the most demanding notebook users. It is suitable for computer enthusiasts and gamers who need the highest performance.

1. The positioning of the year was similar to that of the i3 in the same period, which belonged to the low-end products, and the performance was so-so.

2. However, it is now 2021, and the performance and performance are seriously lagging behind, and now its multi-threaded performance is similar to that of Celeron G5900, but the single-core performance is 34% lower than that of G5900.

The cost-effective products of the year are now too old.

The performance of the Phenom 955 is slightly higher than that of the Athlon 750K; **Slightly less than Athlon 750k; The power consumption is slightly higher than that of the Athlon 750k, and the platform of the Athlon 750k has higher memory frequencies than the Phenom 955 platform without overclocking. The combined performance of these two CPUs is basically the same.

The cost performance is higher than that of the Phenom 955; The upgrade space is more on the FM2 platform of the Athlon 750K.

The 955 has relatively high performance, but the power consumption and heat are too high.

955 strong.

Both CPUs have no problem coping with Battlefield 3 in either case.