Ask about Korean Chinese grammar questions! Two sentences of Korean grammar problems

I'm a fourth-year graduate in the Korean language department, and I bought the third volume of standard Korean Chinese the year before last, and this one you asked is very impressive, and I'll translate this first

Use "who, **, what" when asking a specific object in an interrogative sentence.

However, they are not only used in this way, but can also be used in interrogative or declarative sentences, when asking or explaining something that is not necessary to be clarified.

Namely, in the "Did you go to ** yesterday?" In the article, there is both a question about the place you went to yesterday and a question about whether you went out yesterday B.

Such sentences will have different intonations depending on the meaning. ,('어디'에 있

That is, when you want to express the meaning of a, because the focus is on "**", you should strengthen the tone on this word, and the intonation should rise at the end of the sentence.

However, if you want to express the meaning of b, you need to say "yes" or "no" as in a general interrogative sentence. Therefore, the tone at the end of the sentence should be raised.

The above is a translation, let me tell you my personal understanding

That is to say, this grammar has three uses and two meanings. (Take an example).

The first usage is in the interrogative sentence, when you really want to ask the other person, you should emphasize the word "**" when speaking. For example: Where are you going? The other party needs to come out with a specific place.

The second usage is also an interrogative sentence, but the focus of the tone is not on the "**", it may just be to determine whether the other party is out of business. It's equivalent to our Chinese "Are you going out?" ”

The third type of grammar is a declarative sentence, which can also be stated by oneself or by others, such as the question of usage two. Such as:"네,어"At this time, it translates to: Yes, I'll go out.

It's not a very complicated syntax, but I don't know if my explanation is clear enough

Sometimes it may be very clear, but it is not comprehensive, I hope it will help you understand this syntax somewhat

Who, which, what" is generally used when asking a specific object in the discussion, but in addition to them, in the discussion ** confusion is the explanatory text does not want to express the content confusion is used when the explanation is used, "Where did you go yesterday?" Such a sentence.

Example. 1 Although it also means to ask about the place where you went yesterday.

2 I also have the meaning of asking where I came back from work yesterday.

Thus there is a strange difference according to their meaning, example.

It's too long,......

Fixed format: [verb stem + " ].

In each sentence there are two action verbs for or action verbs, the first verb is primary, and the second verb is subordinate.

The second verb in this case does not mean "something specific to you", but only the tendency of the first verb.

It can be said to "provide" a service or to "instruct" an action. Analysis:

Provide "Offer".

3.Make it dynamic).

Provide "Reference: Fixed format: [verb stem+" ]

Provide a "fixed format: [verb stem+" ]

Indicates "Fixed format: [verb stem+" ].

Indicates "Fixed format: [foreign verb stem+" ].

(washing) instructions".

service) indicates".

I'll break it down and you'll see it at a glance.

One thing to note here is the honorific of yes.

As for change, you just have to memorize this and encounter this word in the future, and it's a rule.

Because the grammar he adds is (

Can be omitted.

So will become will become

All of the above is true, but it is difficult for beginners to understand.

Tell you how to do it.

1.If the ending is a verb, use it

2.If the ending is a verb, use it when it's hard to tell, because it's common!

3.For example, there is a radio

There is no use for radio, for example

You wrote it incorrectly, it should be and

It's a student.

It's Apple.

There is radio plus

Confiscation of phonetic pluses

It is generally used in command texts and invitation texts.

It's used in negative texts, but the word has been somewhat abused by Koreans. For the sake of writing accuracy, let's change it to .

Also, the word does not mean work, but the act of going to the workplace. And the Chinese you want to express Can you play at work? It felt a little different.

You could say that there is a lot of traffic jam on the way to work. )

Can you play when you go to workCan you play on your way to work?

Can you dance?

The meaning is not clear, it means having the ability, but it cannot be done in certain situations.

Will it be. Grammatically it's fine. But it feels a little awkward to speak. I think it's better to use a form that is more accurate.

And one more thing, it means no, it means no.

The sentence is 'no'

And you didn't make any sentences.

First of all, I admire the perseverance of the landlord, and it is indeed very hard to study by myself.

It can be said that there is nothing wrong with all four syntax. is a little more Chinese in the application.

If I had to say anything, it would be.

The fourth syntax you should use in the past tense.

"~할 "All right.

수"That's right.

Only this

Nothing else is wrong! I asked my Korean friend directly.

It should be no problem.

One. and the difference between .

And ( can indicate that the reason is right, the one you mentioned above is followed by a co-verb sentence, and a declarative sentence should be added after it, but in reality, there may be contradictions, but they basically follow the above principles, specifically like this:

1.It is usually followed by a declarative sentence to indicate the exact cause and effect. Example:

2.( It is usually followed by a co-verb sentence and a command sentence, for example:

3.( Occasionally, there will be a case of a declarative sentence, but have you noticed that this kind of declarative sentence is usually very subjective and subjective?) And the reason why this grammar is followed by co-verb sentences and command sentences is not because these two sentence patterns are obviously with subjective will?

For example, in the sentence you mentioned above, 5 means - it's not rush hour, so (I guess) just wait another 5 minutes. The following sentence is clearly a subjective guess of the individual.

So to sum up, ( can be connected with a declarative sentence, but this kind of declarative sentence must have a personal subjective will component in it, if it is just an ordinary declarative sentence, especially the kind of declarative sentence in the past tense that indicates the completion of the action, it is a sick sentence.

Two. And the question – and what's the difference?

However, ( ) does not always mean the reason, but can also mean a hint and description, for example:

Having said so much, I don't know if there is anything missing, that's basically it

The declarative language in the original sentence is a respected teacher. So, they were respected as the subject of the request.