How to lead, what kind of leadership do you lead, what kind of leadership do you want?

Read more books about successful people.

Here's what I want my leadership to be:

The first is to be generous, generous to employees, and not careful.

The second is to be decisive, make decisions simply and neatly, and do not drag mud and water. The third is to have a vision, accurately grasp the industry situation, and always lead the company in the right direction.

Fourth, have empathy.

Know how to empathize, often think about employees, and will not always make some rules that embarrass employees.

Fifth, have a sense of responsibility.

Be able to take responsibility for the company and take responsibility for the decisions you make.

Sixth, he is charming, exuding the temperament of a successful person, which makes people always want to rush up to take a group photo when they see it.

Seventh, kindness and a sense of social responsibility.

He is also enthusiastic about charity and always maintains a positive image.

Such a leader is too perfect to come by. I think a leader must have a vision to lead the whole company to success, and only when the company makes money can employees have better prospects.

I don't think so. The leader is indeed right, and the customer is indeed right, there is no doubt about this, because identity and status determine right and wrong, not your fault, but identity and status tell you that the definition of right and wrong is different between time and right occasion.

Why is leadership always right?

1.Different statuses look at problems from different angles.

For the same thing, the leader thinks more about the problem, just like the first and fifth floors, the scope of the view is different, and the problems found are different. Leadership decisions may not be entirely right, but at least they can see further and consider more issues. Individuals may think about just the work now, while leaders think about not only the work now, but also the direction of the future.

2.There is an information gap between superiors and subordinates.

There are various information gaps between superiors and subordinates, so they judge things differently. It is clear that the more information you have, the more comprehensive the leadership, the better the judgment of things. In the workplace, interests determine right and wrong, which is a very real problem, low cost and high return are the most correct choice, rather than blindly pursuing the so-called right and wrong.

Leaders can control more objective material conditions, so leaders can use these disposable material conditions to prove that their decisions and judgments are correct, and as a subordinate, even if you are right, but without the support of resources, it is difficult to prove whether your judgment is correct, even if there is support from resources, it is not necessarily correct.

4.Workplace rules: subordinates obey superiors.

The rule of the workplace is that the subordinates obey the superiors, and the individual obeys the collective, even if you are right, but disobedience is already a mistake, not to mention, the leader is responsible for the collective, and the subordinates are only responsible for themselves and the work. The subordinates are not necessarily wrong, but the leaders must be right. The subordinates do not obey the superiors, even if they are right, but in the end it is themselves who suffer, and they cannot prove whether they are right in the end.

If you are unintentional, then accept criticism with the same humility, and then if your reasons are more legitimate and sufficient, then reveal it intentionally or unintentionally, and let the other party know that you are still very dedicated, and this time it is just a last resort. If it's not sufficient, then it's better not to talk too much, accept criticism with peace of mind, and pay attention next time. Again, if you need the job.

Then look at what message the other party sent you, if it is a work-related message, you didn't reply, brought losses to the company, or slowed down the progress of the project, etc., then you should criticize you. Although your personal time is your own, as long as you are still an employee of the company, you should be responsible for your work, as long as it is not force majeure, or a major accident, you should not deliberately not reply to messages, if not intentionally, then you should also accept criticism, after all, the workplace looks at the result, not the process.

If it's not work-related, but a private message, then it's his fault that he criticizes you, you only have a working relationship with the company's leaders, no personal relationship, and this kind of private message will not be sent to you, if he still shamelessly criticizes you, you can ignore it, and even re-examine it, whether it is necessary to follow this leader, and whether there is a future.

Finally, see if you want to continue to work in this company, if you don't need this job anymore, as long as it doesn't cause serious property damage to the company and won't make you bear any legal responsibility, then you don't need to care, the big deal is to leave. If you still need it, then there will inevitably be moments when you have to swallow your anger.

The most powerful leader I have ever seen is good at employing people, and correcting employees' incorrect practices in a timely manner, because the leader is so powerful, so every employee is excellent. Let's take a look at what kind of leadership is the most powerful.

A good-tempered leader.

Often a leader with a high level of leadership, they will know how to control their temper, and we can find that this kind of leader never brings their emotions to work. Because in their hearts work and family life are separate. In particular, not being able to bring your emotions into your work is a very low-level mistake.

If you bring your temper to work for a long time, you should also feel that the leader is very incompetent, and it will gradually have a bad effect. And the real level of leadership, they often mingle with the employees around them in the team, this kind of leadership will be worthy of the people around them, and will slowly win the hearts of the people.

A leader who is good at correcting mistakes.

Each of us makes mistakes at any stage, and any team will have shortcomings. Therefore, those good leaders are often good at finding mistakes and solving them with employees calmly. The leader's job is to supervise the team to improve everyone's workflow.

If a leader wants to make the team good, then he must be good at correcting mistakes, on the contrary, those low-level leaders often ignore the team's problems, so that there is no way to solve them for a long time. As a result, there are more and more mistakes made by employees, and in the end, there is no way to progress the work.

Leaders who are good at communicating with employees are often good leaders.

They all have very high emotional intelligence and are good at communicating with employees. Never for the sake of their own interests, in front of the return of subordinates to talk about beating around the bush. If you can chat with employees calmly, then employees will understand the leader from many aspects, and will also understand the meaning of the leader.

If a leader is not good at communicating with employees, he always asks everyone to guess that the team must not be able to move forward. Therefore, a good leader must have strong communication skills. In fact, in our career, it may not be our personal ability that determines our development, but our leadership, after all, no matter how good a person is, if no one is willing to train you and promote you, then it is really difficult for us to grow.