What is the issue of scientific ethics and style of study?

The issue of scientific ethics and style of study refers to the phenomenon of anomie among scientific and technological workers in terms of scientific research norms, codes of conduct, academic spirit, academic attitude, academic atmosphere, and academic principles. Because it is not conducive to the development of science and technology and the correct use of scientific and technological achievements, it is called a problem. The problems of scientific ethics and style of study reflect the problems and loopholes existing in the scientific research activities of the modern scientific research system, including the ethical and moral problems at the spiritual level of scientific and technological workers, and the scientific research norms at the behavioral level.

As far as the cause of science and technology is concerned, the issue of scientific ethics and style of study has a direct impact on the prosperity and development of science, and is an issue of overall and fundamental importance. Strengthening the building of scientific ethics and style of study is not only the premise and foundation for promoting the healthy development of academic research itself, but also plays a positive role in promoting the social atmosphere of seeking truth and pragmatism and in continuously improving the ideological and moral standards of the whole society.

Misconduct and manifestations in 7 aspects of scientific ethics and study style construction:

1. Plagiarism and plagiarism of other people's achievements. Plagiarism and plagiarism of other people's experimental data, chart analysis, and even large paragraphs of text descriptions in scientific research results such as **, research reports, and books.

2. Falsification and tampering with experimental data. In the analysis of experimental data and charts, arbitrarily fabricating data or selectively using data to prove one's own arguments, influencing and misleading other scientific and technological workers.

3. Arbitrarily encroaching on the scientific research achievements of others. Using his authority to sign the ** or achievements that have not contributed, and taking the achievements of others as his own; Disseminate special information and ideas obtained through meetings, reviews and other processes to the outside world at will; Arbitrarily modify the author's ranking and copyright unit after being accepted or awarded; In order to successfully publish or win awards, privately sign the name of a well-known scientist; In order to complete scientific research tasks or seek job title promotion, colleagues, classmates, relatives and friends who have nothing to do with work name each other.

4. Heavy table.

5. The quality of academic excellence is reduced and the education is irresponsible. Divide the scientific research results that could have been published in a complete article into multiple submissions, reduce the quality of the research work, and destroy the systematization and integrity of the research work; Some professors and doctoral supervisors recruit dozens or even hundreds of graduate students to work for themselves in order to complete scientific research tasks, which is unable to comprehensively and effectively educate and train graduate students, resulting in a large-scale decline in the scientific research quality of graduate students.

6. Highlight personal interests in academic evaluation and project declaration. In the absence of a conflict of interest with oneself, try to exaggerate the evaluation of others, and abuse words such as "internationally advanced, internationally leading, and world-class level"; In the case of a conflict of interest with oneself, belittle the scientific research achievements of predecessors or others, and exaggerate oneself.

7. Excessive pursuit of fame and fortune promotes impetuousness. Some scientific and technological workers, especially those who have made certain academic achievements and have a certain status in the academic circles, hold too many social and academic positions, are busy attending various conferences all day long, and have very little time to devote to scientific research.

The essence of the problem of scientific ethics and style of study is scientific misconduct, academic anomie, and impetuous style of study.

1. Scientific misconduct mainly refers to those that violate the principle of honesty and tampering, fabrication, forgery, plagiarism and other behaviors in scientific activities such as project application, research implementation, and achievement report. The impact of such acts on the scientific and technological community and society is quite bad, which damages the social credibility of the scientific and technological community and the mutual trust between scientists, and harms the quality of scientific research results;

2. The phenomenon of academic anomie exists in a large number of scientific research and scientific research management activities, which is mainly manifested in the distortion of the work motivation of some scientific researchers, who do not concentrate on studying knowledge, but blindly pursue fame and fortune, and are keen to pull relationships, go through the back door, and set up mountains in order to obtain and occupy resources.

3. The impetuous style of study reflects the improper research atmosphere and the spiritual and cultural pursuit and behavioral habits of the research group. A small number of scientific and technological personnel and some college students and graduate students have lost their scientific and realistic attitude and scientific research integrity, and have simply pursued fame and fortune instead of carrying out research work in a down-to-earth manner. For example, keen to publish "showmanship" or even "garbage" that makes little sense both theoretically and practically.

This impetuous style of study has begun to spread among a considerable number of universities and research institutes.

Science and culture play a crucial role, selfless dedication, love for science and the formation of a good demeanor plays a very important role, not only the influence of bad social trends, but also its own unique value pursuit and spiritual temperament, there are many complex factors. The emergence of the problem of scientific ethics and style of study, Huaibei as the orange tree" metaphor vividly illustrates that it is a problem of deviation or contradiction between the development of science and technology and the trend of social resource allocation, but fundamentally speaking, groups engaged in scientific research activities need a pursuit of truth more than other social groups. In the same way, indifferent to fame and fortune, bravely scaling new heights, and noble study style and morality will also advocate science for the development of science and culture and even for the whole society.

Huainan is orange, rigorous and realistic. For example, the older generation of scientists in China have lofty aspirations, integrity and responsibility, and scientific culture has a long-term and deep-seated impact on the shaping of scientific research personnel's study style and morality, and a cultural atmosphere of sincere cooperation. The essence of the problem of scientific ethics and style of study is the lack of scientific culture or the problem of stunted development, and there are also shortcomings and loopholes in the scientific research system, and scientific research activities, as a special social activity, have set a glorious example for scientific and technological workers and even the whole society with excellent scientific ethics and academic quality.